SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - In absence of any yardstick or guideline to determine an expenditure as excessive payment, AO has no discretion to make disallowance: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHEENAI, MAY 25, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether, in the absence of any yardstick or guideline to determine an expenditure as excessive payment, AO has no discretion to make disallowance. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company had filed return for relevant AY. During assessment AO noted that assessee had paid certain commission to the Chairman cum Managing Director of the company. It appeared that the commission was computed at the rate of 20% of the profit of the assessee before tax. The AO found that the amount of commission paid to Chairman cum MD fell within the ambit of Section 40A(2) of the Act. The AO disallowed the profit commission paid considering it to be excessive and unreasonably high. On appeal, CIT(A) and Tribunal passed order in favour of assessee.

On appeal, the High Court held that,

++ an appeal lies u/s 260A of the IT Act, on a substantial question of law. Right of appeal is not automatic. Right of appeal is conferred by statute. When statute confers a limited right of appeal only in a case which involves substantial questions of law, it is not open for Court to sit in appeal over the factual findings arrived at by the Appellate Tribunal;

++ section 40A(2)(a) provides that if the officer is of opinion that expenditure to a Director of a company was excessive or unreasonable having regard to the fair market value of the goods, services or facilities for which the payment was made or the legitimate needs of the business, occupation of the assessee or the benefit derived by or accruing to him there from, so much of the expenditure as was considered by him to be excessive or unreasonable would not be allowed as a deduction. There is no yardstick or guideline for judging when the expenditure incurred by the assessee would be excessive or unreasonable. The decision is left to the AO. The decision is a subjective decision having regard to the facts of the case. Hence there is no question of law far less any substantial question of law involved in these appeals.

(See 2018-TIOL-967-HC-MAD-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.

TOP NEWS


AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST