News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
ST - Refund matured only as result of Tribunal's order, therefore, there is no question of granting interest for period prior to date of order: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 11, 2018: THE appellant deposited the adjudged dues of duty, interest and 25% penalty confirmed by order-in-original dated 30.6.2011. In appeal before Tribunal they succeeded and, therefore, filed a refund claim in respect of the amount deposited.

Refund was granted but without any interest.

Aggrieved against denial of interest, an Appeal was filed but the Commissioner(A) did not rule in their favour.

The matter is now in the CESTAT.

The appellant submitted that they are entitled for interest right from the date of deposit of the amount in view of the apex court decision in ONGC Ltd. - 2007-TIOL-138-SC-CUS.

The AR submitted that the refund became mature only after the demand order was set aside by the Tribunal and since the refund was sanctioned within three months from the date of filing application u/s 11B, no interest is payable. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. - 2011-TIOL-105-SC-CX, Indian Thermoplastics (P) Ltd. - 2003-TIOL-234-CESTAT-DEL-LB.

The Bench considered the submissions and inter alia observed –

+ On plain reading of Section 11BB, the interest is payable from three months from the date of application. Except the provision of Section 11BB, there is no provision by which the interest can be granted from the date of deposit.

+ This Tribunal, being a creature under the statute of Central Excise Act, cannot go beyond the statutory provision made under that Act. Therefore, the interest is not payable from the date of deposit, but it is payable only after three months of filing the application.

After distinguishing the case law(s) cited by the appellant, the CESTAT adverted to the provision of Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of the CEA, 1944 defining 'relevant date' which reads:-

"(ec) in case where the duty becomes refundable as a consequence of judgment, decree, order or direction of appellate authority, Appellate Tribunal or any court, the date of such judgment, decree, order or direction."

Thereafter, the Tribunal observed -

+ The 'relevant date' means in case where the duty becomes refundable as a consequence of judgment, decree, order or direction of appellate authority, Appellate Tribunal or any court, the date of such judgment, decree, order or direction.

+ As per the above provision, the refund becomes matured only as a consequence of the Appellate Tribunal's order. When the refund itself is not matured prior to the date of Appellate Tribunal's order, there is no question of interest for the period prior to the date of order.

Holding that the appeal does not survive, the same was dismissed.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.