News Update

Apple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedGST - Tax liability was imposed because petitioner replied without annexing documents - It is just and appropriate that an opportunity be provided to contest tax demand on merits, albeit by putting petitioner on terms: HCMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsGST - Petitioner has failed to avail opportunities granted repeatedly - Court cannot entertain request for remand as there has been no procedural impropriety and infraction of any provision by assessing authority: HCNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HCI-T- Denial of deduction u/s 80IC can create perception of genuine hardship, where claimant paid tax in excess of what was due; order denying deduction merits re-consideration: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 pollsGermany disfavours Brazil’s proposal to tax super-richI-T- If material found during search are not incriminating in nature AO can not made any addition u/s 153A in respect of unabated assessment: ITATGovt appoints Dinesh Tripathi as New Navy ChiefAFMS, IIT Kanpur to develop tech to address health problems of soldiersFBI sirens against Chinese hackers eyeing US infrastructureKenya’s top military commanders perish in copter crashCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates w.e.f. April 19, 2024Meta shares ‘Most Intelligent’ AI assistant built on Llama modelDengue cases soaring in US - Close to ‘Emergency situation’: UN Agency
 
I-T - A club open to a section of community cannot be construed to be set up for benefit of an individual or class of individuals: ITAT

 

BY TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 14, 2018: THE ISSUE AT HAND IS - Whether a club which is open to a section of the entire community can be construed to have been established for the benefit of an individual or a select group of individuals. NO IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee is registered as a charitable organization u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee had filed returns for relevant AY claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act. During assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the main object of the assessee is to impart training and coaching in various sports disciplines. The AO further observed that the assessee derived income from hiring and royalty & called upon the assessee to explain as to why the benefit of exemption claimed u/s 11 would not be denied as its activities came within the ambit of proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. Later, the AO dismissed the assessee's contentions and denied the benefit of exemption claimed u/s 11 but allowed the benefit of mutuality in respect of assessee's main activity. The assessee's income generated from hiring and royalty and other services was treated as business income. On appeal, the CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the benefit of exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Act. Hence the Revenue's appeal.

On hearing the matter, the Tribunal held,

++ the co-ordinate bench of ITAT, Mumbai G-Bench in ITA No.2139/M/2016 for assessment year 2011-12 has allowed the benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; the Bombay High Court in the case of DIT (Exemption) vs. Goregaon Sports Club has held that providing sports facilities to general public without restriction of any caste, creed, religion or profession is eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The relevant portion of the order is " .. the membership of the club is open to a section of the community would not detract from the fact that the club has been constituted for the advancement of any other object of general public utility, and the Club is not formed for the benefit of an individual or a group of individuals as such. For affirming that the object of the Club falls within the purview of Section 2(15), the Assessing Officer should determine whether as regards the application of the funds, the requirements of section 11 have been duly fulfilled...." ; following the decision of Bombay High Court in assessee's own case for assessment year 2003-04, it was noted that the assessee was eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The AO was directed to allow the benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

(See 2018-TIOL-848-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.