News Update

India, Oman resolve to expediate talks for DTAATight schedule for Monsoon Session - 46 bills to be passed in 24 daysGovt proposes to amend law for Fastags for all commercial vehiclesCBDT Instruction No 3/18 - Board asks CCITs to wrap up withdrawal of appeals by Aug 20, 2018I-T - If assessee fails to establish urgent nature of business necessities for taking loans from its Directors in cash, such transaction warrants levy of penalty u/s 271D: ITAT Special BenchOECD employment rate raises by 0.2% in Q1SC asks Parliament to enact new law to deal with mobocracyST - If GOI department could be treated as using 'Residential Complex' constructed by NBCC for its 'personal use', how another Corporate body could be denied benefit of that type of user of 'Residential Complex' to be occupied by its Managerial Staff: HCPlace of removal - Valuation under CE & Customs Laws - past and present (See 'TOG INSIGHT' on 'Taxongo.com')India mulling safeguard duty on Chinese and Malaysian solar panelsGovt hikes basic import duty on many textile goodsIMF says India to be fastest growing economy in 2019CBDT prescribes registration form for Non-resident applicantsIs disallowing supplementary claim under MEIS & SEIS Scheme by DGFT valid?CX - On being pointed out, Assessee immediately reversed Credit wrongly availed - there cannot be said to be any fraud through which it wanted to evade Duty - setting aside of interest & penalty cannot be faulted: HCIGST refund - CBIC launches another fortnightly drive till July 30I-T - Complaint received against assessee is a reason to suspect but it is not a reason to believe that some income has escaped assessment untill AO verifies content of information before initiating re-assessment: ITATWCO Secretary General lauds India's efforts to use technology for trade facilitationBrahMos successfully test-fired from Balasore Test RangeIndia-Oman Joint Commission Meeting begins in MuscatHi-tech maritime labs launching programmes for traineesChina's GDP logs 6.8% growth in first half of fiscal20 hurt in pandal collapse during PM's Midnapore political rallyExports - Accountability of inputs - DGFT eases norms for Advance Authorisation holdersCustoms - CBIC expands list of exempt items for handicraft sectorI-T - Even if soil separated from land and put in containers it continues to be specie of land and income from growing mushrooms in such containers under controlled environment is agri income exempt u/s 10(1): ITAT Special BenchWTO - Govt officials attend workshop on SPS control, Inspection & approval proceduresI-T - Surplus generated by agriculturist on sale of his agri land is no basis to deny exemption u/s 2(14) and treat sale consideration as business income: HCSecond Year of GST - A year to amend mistakesCommittee set up to examine 'decriminalisation' of offences under Companies Act
 
Advance Rulings - need to have a national AAR

 

JULY 02, 2018

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

THE attention is drawn to my earlier article on the captioned subject. A lot has already been written and discussed about the advance rulings given by different AARs in different States as being contradictory, illegal, illogical etc. However, it was always going to be difficult for the AARs. The AAR is a creature of Statute, a petite in the whole scheme of system. A question being asked from AAR simply implies that the battery of advocates, chartered accountants, consultants etc. could not come to a conclusion on a specific subject. Or is it seeking clarification from a government body by paying a small fee! Suffice to say, it implies that either the law is not clear, or has gaps or is silent on an issue. Thus, it is always possible that there would be multiple interpretations of the existing law vis-à-vis the question being asked. The AAR is in the system just to interpret the law. It cannot put anything on its own or import the intentions into the law so as to give a ruling. Law has to be strictly interpreted. Therefore, AARs appear to be in a very precarious situation.

The purpose of the Advance Ruling mechanism too is more to do with certainty or an effort to bring clarity or an effort for a conclusion to an issue. However, this certainty is not with reference to law but has to do with the applicant. It provides certainty to the applicant and may not provide any certainty to law. Certainty to law is only possible if the ruling on an issue is binding on the department in respect of the whole country. However, it is not intended to be so. Thus, certainty to an issue is only possible though clear and simple law or through judicial intervention/rulings. To that extent, advance rulings not only have limitations with no precedence value; but also they do not provide even credible value.

Therefore, scope of their job should be enhanced. It should not only to interpret the law and give a ruling binding on both department and applicant , but also to escalate the issues which are not taken care of by the existing law. GST is an evolving law and works on continuous feedback. AARs are in a much better position to contribute towards this purpose. They are the first point of contact in respect of difficult questions and get to know the views of the taxpayers/trade as well as of the department. Advance ruling mechanism should be used more as a tool to help in finding the gaps in the law and improve it so as to move towards the best. In the initial days, it was being said that best should not become the enemy of good and we should implement the law in whatever form it is and strive towards the ideal law over time as things and time go by. Now, after an year has gone by, it certainly is the time to act upon.

The department should conduct some sort of thematic audit of all the advance rulings so as to confirm the rulings from judiciousness and correctness. Wherever the law is deficient, the same should suitably be amended. In many such rulings, the real solution lies in amending the law and not rulings in case of single concern.

It is high time that the GST Council should consider the formation of one national AAR for the country. Since, all the State and Centre GST Laws are harmonised to a large extent, except in a few stray cases like intra-state e-way bill mechanism, it is possible to have national AAR. It may also help in allowing rulings in respect of questions having multi-state implications like "place of supply" which cannot be asked for in the present scheme. The government can go further out of its narrow mindedness and declare that the ruling of AAR shall be binding on the department in whole of the country instead of saying that it is binding only in respect of activities of the person who seeks the rulings. It will give a lot of boost, confidence and certainty to the law. In fact, the Trade Facilitation Agreement talks about advance rulings and mandates that advance rulings should be binding on department; however, it allows a national legislation to decide as to whether the ruling may be binding on the applicant as well. India is a signatory to the Trade Facilitation Agreement. Though it is international agreement and pertains only to cross border movements, the ideas therein can always be imbibed and such innovative thinking only will bring confidence to the system. The GST council may decide that rulings may not be binding on the applicants.

Advance Ruling mechanism, a sort of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is an excellent tool to bring certainty in the law.It should not be allowed to go down the drain by simply turning a blind eye. A national AAR, thematic audit of all advance rulings, continuous feedback from the AAR to GST council for deficiencies in law and from GST Council/Law committee to AAR for clarifying some of the issues can go a long way in getting the right things done, if done in a right way. Wherever required, the government should clarify the legal position on the advance rulings, if necessary, and the law should suo moto be amended, if advance rulings brings clarity over an issue.

(The author is Managing Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed above are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

GST 1st Anniversary - A Hardlook (Episode 2) | simply inTAXicating

What's New

CGST Notification
CGST Rate Notification
CGST Circular
Income Tax Notification
Income Tax Circular
Customs Tariff Notification
Customs NT Notification
Customs Circular
Anti Dumping Notification
DGFT Notification
DGFT Public Notice
DGFT Circular
RBI Circular

TAXATION & WILDLIFE