News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
IT - Revenue can either accept surrender and admission of assessee or estimate income by rejecting books of accounts but cannot choose both: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JULY 04, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether Revenue can opt only one of the method for computing taxable income, either accepts the surrender and admission of the assessee or estimate the income by rejecting books of accounts but can not opt for both simultaneously. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee company, engaged in the business of manufacturing had filed return for relevant AY. A survey u/s 133A was conducted on the assessee. On the basis of survey, it came to knowledge of AO that assessee was indulged in bogus transactions. The assessee admitted the same and surrendered the amount. The assessee also made surrender of Rs. 2.05 crores u/s 41(1) of the Act on account of liabilities that are no longer required to be paid under the Head "Remission of Liabilities" in the case of assessee and group concerns. Further, the assessee during the course of survey made surrender of various other amounts u/s 41(1) of Act. The AO, considered the case on the basis of the seized material. The assessee in order to avoid litigation, agreed for estimating net profit @ 8% of the turnover. The AO noted that assessee did not produced books of account and the vouchers and seized material were not been reconciled. The AO in absence of any satisfactory explanation by assessee, rejected the books of account u/s 145(3) of the Act. The AO made the addition of Rs.4.52 crores to the returned income which was inclusive of the surrender made by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings. The AO also noted that there was a difference of Rs.1,08,003/- pertaining to the confirmation called for in the case of Graphite India Ltd., which had not been explained. Therefore, further addition of Rs.1,08,003/- was made. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the AO held that since books of account have not been produced by assessee, therefore, he is not satisfied about correctness and completeness of the accounts of the assessee, therefore, same were rejected. The AO instead of rejecting the books of account of assessee should have computed the income of the assessee based upon the books of account which were produced before him as per explanation of assessee. However, he has not taken any figure from the books of account and accepted the admission of the surrender of Rs.4.52 crores for the purpose of making the addition. The Assessee, therefore, rightly contended that AO cannot go with both the methods for the purpose of making the addition against the assessee. Either the AO should go with the surrender and admission of the assessee or may go to estimate the income of the assessee by referring to the books of account and other material on record. The surrender was on account of unexplained investment in purchase of land and machinery which is different from estimation of profit by rejecting the books of account. The AO did not accept surrender of assessee at the assessment stage and rejected books of account of assessee under section 145(3) of the Act, but, later on, AO did not estimate the income of assessee based on books of account, but accepted the surrender of Rs.4.52 crores so surrendered during the course of survey. The assessee on the other hand, has pleaded that books of account have been produced before AO. Therefore, there is contradiction in the statement of assessee and findings of the AO. The AO also noted in the assessment order that at the time of reconciliation books of account of the assessee may not be ready by that time. These facts, therefore, clearly show that the matter requires reconsideration at the level of the AO because if the AO wanted to rely upon the seized material, he has to compute the income based on the seized material. However, nothing has been done in the matter. Accordingly, it was decided to set aside the orders of the authorities below on the issue of addition of Rs.4.52 crores and restore to AO for fresh determination. The AO shall pass the order afresh in accordance with law by considering the entire evidence on record, books of account to be produced by the assessee along with other details. The AO shall give reasonable, sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-1006-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.