News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
I-T - Adjudication on issue of penalty cannot be made until addition based on which penalty is imposed is settled and finalized : ITAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JULY 11, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether adjudication on issue of penalty can not be made till the time the addition based on which penalty is imposed is settled and finalized. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

A search and seizure operation was conducted in Jaksons Group of cases on 10.02.2010 and the assessment proceedings were initiated by issuing the notice u/s 153C of the Act. However, no return was filed in response to the notice u/s 153C of the Act. Therefore, the assessment was completed u/s 144 r.w.s. 153C of the Act. Addition on account of unsecured loans and on account of disallowance of expenses were made to the total income of the assessee company. On appeal, CIT(A) partly passed order in favour of assessee. The AO initiated the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of addition sustained by the CIT(A). The AO levied the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. On appeal, the CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee sustained the penalty imposed. Aggrieved assessee filed appeal before Tribunal.

Tribunal held that,

++ it is noticed that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has been levied by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) on the basis of the addition made on account of disallowances out of expenses. The said addition was a subject matter of the assessee's appeal in ITA No. 3642/Del/2014 for the assessment year under consideration wherein this issue has been set aside to the file of the CIT(A) to be decided afresh by providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Since, the penalty sustained u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is directly related to the addition sustained by the CIT(A) out of the expenses, the said issue has been set aside to the file of the CIT(A). Therefore, the present issue relating to the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is also restored to the file of the CIT(A) to be adjudicated after considering the outcome of the appeals on quantum. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

(See 2018-TIOL-1063-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.