News Update

Unveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesI-T- Secured creditor has priority charge over secured asset, over claims of I-T Department & other Departments; any excess amount recovered by Secured Creditor from auction of secured asset, over & above the dues payable to it, are to be remitted to the Departments: HCFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesI-T - Once assssee on year of reversal has paid taxes on excess provision and similar feature appeared in earlier years and assesee had payments for liquidated damages on delay of deliverables, no adverse inference can be drawn: HCFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerST - Software development service & IT-enabled service provided by assessee was exempt from tax during relevant period, by virtue of CBEC's Notification & Circular; demands raised for such period not sustainable: CESTATUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayCus - Order rejecting exporter's request for conversion of Shipping Bills on grounds that the same has been made by exporter beyond period of three months from date of Let Export Order in terms of CBEC Circular No. 36/2010-Cus : CESTATIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEACus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTATThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCX - As per settled law, a right acquired as result of a statutory provision, cannot be taken away retrospectively unless said statutory provision so provides or by necessary implication has such effect: CESTAT
 
I-T - 'Tapping of toddy' being traditional agri enterprise, is at variance from foreign liquor trade, and hence very much eligible for exemption benefit u/s 80P(2): HC

 

By TIOL News Service

ERNAKULAM, JULY 12, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether though 'toddy' comes under the definition of 'liquor' as defined under the Abkari Act, the same can be said to be agricultural produce, since it is a product which is extracted from a tree just as any other agricultural produce is extracted. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessees are cooperative societies engaged in tapping of toddy and vending it through licensed shops. During the year under consideration, the assessees had claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(iii), but failed to file their income tax return. Accordingly, on the said basis, the Revenue Authorities denied such claim of deduction. The assessee's counsel pointed out that exemption as applicable to co-operative societies u/s 80P was a deduction of the total income and, hence, the same could be applied even without a return filed. The decision in the case of CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd was relied on to contend that the deduction being available to the total income, de hors the technical defect of return having not been filed, the AO ought to have allowed the deduction at the point of computing of gross total income as provided under Chapter IV.

High Court held that,

++ the appeals filed by the Revenue are on the premise that toddy cannot be termed to be an 'agricultural produce'. The Tribunal has agreed that toddy is an agricultural produce. The Revenue's counsel would argue that toddy being an intoxicating liquor, the extraction and sale are regulated by the State under the provisions of the Abkari Act. The income generated from such vending under license, cannot be covered u/s 80P(2)(iii). It is also argued that initially the claim of the assessee was u/s 80P(2)(vi), which later, before the FAA the assessee changed to one u/s 80P. As per the Revenue, what is intended by the exemption provision is to grant an incentive to the agricultural activity, which cannot be extended to 'toddy' coming under the definition of 'liquor' as defined under the Abkari Act. This Court is unable to agree with such contentions of the counsel. As has been found by the FAA and the Tribunal, toddy is a product which is extracted from a tree just as any other agricultural produce is extracted. The mere fact of a particular agricultural activity having not been carried out would not be the sole ground for denying the exemption as available to the marketing of an agricultural produce when carried out by the co-operative Society. Regulatory regime under the Abkari Act would also be not relevant in deciding whether the Society would be entitled to the exemption as available u/s 80P. The mere fact that the Society carries on vending of toddy; a trade in liquor, which the Supreme Court has held to be res extra commercium, would not have any effect on the essential nature of the activity of growing trees for the purpose of tapping toddy. The fact of the tree tax being paid by the Society is only on account of the license of tapping and vending having been obtained by the Society. It is also noticed that tapping of toddy is a traditional agricultural enterprise within the State and the State also encourages it; as distinguished from the foreign liquor trade. Therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the orders of Tribunal.

(See 2018-TIOL-1312-HC-KERALA-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023