News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
I-T - When valuation of property by stamp authority is higher than actual sale price, then before calculation of capital gain on such higher value, AO should refer capital asset to DVO for valuation even if not prayed for: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 04, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether when valuation of property by stamp valuation authority is higher than actual sale price claimed by assessee seller, then before calculation of capital gain on such higher value, AO should refer the capital asset to DVO for valuation even if not prayed by assessee. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee, an Individual, engaged in business of Builders & Developers, had filed return for relevant AY. During the relevant year, the assessee had sold one plot of land for consideration of Rs. 4,00,000/- while the market value adopted by office of Sub-Registrar, for the purposes of stamp duty was Rs. 9,03,000/-. The assessee adopted actual value of consideration for computing long term capital gains (LTCG) while the AO adopted Rs. 9,03,000/- as consideration for computing LTCG. On appeal, CIT(A) adjudicated the issue against the assessee. The assessee did not ask for the reference to DVO before the AO for undertaking valuation of the plot of land for the purposes of computing full value of the consideration on sale of plot of land u/s 48. However, before CIT(A) the assessee sought reference to DVO for valuation. The CIT(A) did not refer the matter to DVO citing two reasons:- (a) It will delay the proceedings, (b) assessee had not sought the reference to DVO for valuation before the AO during assessment proceedings.

Tribunal held that,

++ it was noted that power of CIT(A) is co-terminus with the power of the AO. The CIT(A) in view of principles of natural justice and in all fairness of the matter to render substantial justice should have referred the matter to DVO for determining full value of consideration of the plot of land sold for computing long term capital gains u/s 48. Calcutta High Court vide its decision in the case of Sh. Sunil Kumar Agarwal has clearly laid down that it is AO's duty to have given an option to assessee to have the valuation undertaken by DVO as is contemplated u/s 50C. Thus in all fairness, it was decided to set aside the order of CIT(A) and restore the matter back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication of the entire issue on merits after referring the matter to DVO for valuation.

(See 2018-TIOL-1202-ITAT-MUM)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.