News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Assessee is liable to TDS on LTC allowance even if it comes to know about foreign travel by employees only at time of reimbursement of bills: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

BENGALURU, AUG 10, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether Bank is liable to TDS on LTC allowance granted to its employees if it is used for foreign trip and the assessee comes to know about it only at the time of reimbursement of bills. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The TDS officer conducted the survey proceedings in the business of the assessee bank. During the course of survey proceedings, the TDS officer noticed that the assessee had not deducted tax at source on LTC allowance granted by it to its employees, though the amount of allowance was not exempt u/s 10(5) of the Act. According to the TDS officer, the amount of LTC allowance was not exempt because the place of destination was not within India. The submission of assessee was that the employees who intend to avail LTC submits the claim in the prescribed Form declaring designated place of visit which was within India. However, the employee may undertook the tour to place outside. The reimbursement made by the assessee include the travel cost towards both Indian and foreign travel. However, the TDS officer was not satisfied with explanation of assessee and held the assessee as 'the assessee in default' for not deducting tax at source on LTC allowance and passed order u/s 201(1) of the Act and demanding tax on such allowance along with interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) confirmed the action of the TDS officer.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ issue of non deduction of tax at source on LTC allowance is covered against the assessee-bank by the decision of the co-ordinate bench (Bangalore) of the Tribunal in the case of Syndicate Bank vs. Asst.CIT(TDS), wherein, following the decision of the co-ordinate bench (Lucknow) of Tribunal in the case of SBI vs. Dy.CIT it was held that "the assessee may not be aware with the ultimate plan of travel of its employees, but at the time of settlement of the LTC/LFC bills, complete facts are available before the assessee as to where the employees have travelled, for which, he has raised the claim; meaning thereby the assessee was aware of the fact that its employees have travelled in foreign countries, for which, he is not entitled for exemption u/s. 10(5) of the Act. Thus, the payment made to its employees is chargeable to tax and in that situation, the assessee is under obligation to deduct TDS on such payment" Respectfully following the ratio of the decision in the case of Syndicate Bank, it was decided to dismiss the appeals filed by the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-1255-ITAT-BANG)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.