News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN HqsCX - Clearance to sister concern for captive consumption - Department cannot compel assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral: HC75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCPM says NO to religion-based reservationCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Since the objective of Central Government in imposing ban with immediate effect was to avert a food crisis in the country, a strict compliance of exemption conditions would further the said intent of the Notification(s): HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesCX - Appellant should not be left without an opportunity to put-forth his case on merits, particularly, when matter was decided during period of Covid-19 pandemic and also appellant contends that no opportunity of virtual hearing was granted by adjudicating authority: HCKiller floods - 228 killed in Kenya + 78 in BrazilI-T - Grant of registration u/s 12A can't be denied by invoking Sec 13(1)(b), as provisions of section 13 would be attracted only at time of assessment and not at time of grant of registration: ITATFlight cancellation case: Qantas accepts USD 66 mn penaltyI-T- Joint ownership in two residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disentitle the assessee to claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act: ITATIsrael shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentI-T - If assessee was prevented from production of evidences because of its non-availability or delay in its retrieval coupled with ongoing several reassessment, assessee should be allowed to adduce additional evidence: ITATIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarI-T- If assessee is otherwise found eligible, CIT(E) should grant provisional approval to assessee under Clause (iii) to First Proviso to section 80G(5): ITATLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorI-T - Donation made to trust which is otherwise not approved during relevant period as per CBDT Circular, is not eligible for deduction u/s 35(1): ITATGovt scraps ban on export of onionI-T- Assessee could have filed application in Form No.10AB on or before 30.09.2022, which assessee failed to do : ITATUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedI-T- AO erred in making addition for completed/non abated assessment as no incriminating material found during course of search :ITAT
 
I-T - Assessee is liable to TDS on LTC allowance even if it comes to know about foreign travel by employees only at time of reimbursement of bills: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

BENGALURU, AUG 10, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether Bank is liable to TDS on LTC allowance granted to its employees if it is used for foreign trip and the assessee comes to know about it only at the time of reimbursement of bills. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The TDS officer conducted the survey proceedings in the business of the assessee bank. During the course of survey proceedings, the TDS officer noticed that the assessee had not deducted tax at source on LTC allowance granted by it to its employees, though the amount of allowance was not exempt u/s 10(5) of the Act. According to the TDS officer, the amount of LTC allowance was not exempt because the place of destination was not within India. The submission of assessee was that the employees who intend to avail LTC submits the claim in the prescribed Form declaring designated place of visit which was within India. However, the employee may undertook the tour to place outside. The reimbursement made by the assessee include the travel cost towards both Indian and foreign travel. However, the TDS officer was not satisfied with explanation of assessee and held the assessee as 'the assessee in default' for not deducting tax at source on LTC allowance and passed order u/s 201(1) of the Act and demanding tax on such allowance along with interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) confirmed the action of the TDS officer.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ issue of non deduction of tax at source on LTC allowance is covered against the assessee-bank by the decision of the co-ordinate bench (Bangalore) of the Tribunal in the case of Syndicate Bank vs. Asst.CIT(TDS), wherein, following the decision of the co-ordinate bench (Lucknow) of Tribunal in the case of SBI vs. Dy.CIT it was held that "the assessee may not be aware with the ultimate plan of travel of its employees, but at the time of settlement of the LTC/LFC bills, complete facts are available before the assessee as to where the employees have travelled, for which, he has raised the claim; meaning thereby the assessee was aware of the fact that its employees have travelled in foreign countries, for which, he is not entitled for exemption u/s. 10(5) of the Act. Thus, the payment made to its employees is chargeable to tax and in that situation, the assessee is under obligation to deduct TDS on such payment" Respectfully following the ratio of the decision in the case of Syndicate Bank, it was decided to dismiss the appeals filed by the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-1255-ITAT-BANG)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.