News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CX - Rule 6 of CCR cannot be invoked to demand CENVAT in respect of motors, generator, engine, remnant oil arising during breaking up of ship by alleging that sale of the same is trading activity: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 25, 2018: IN this appeal, the facts are that the respondents (ship breaking company) were availing credit of tax paid on input services and the same was utilised for discharge of CE duty on dutiable goods manufactured.

Revenue alleged that the sale of motors, generator, engine, remnant oil etc. amounted to trading activity and, therefore, the respondent ought to have reversed CENVAT credit in terms of rule 6 of the CCR

The respondents argued that the items viz. motors, generator, engine, remnant oil etc. are not purchased by them but recovered during the breaking up of the ship and, therefore, it cannot be said that they are engaged in trading activity.

The Commissioner(A) accepted their contention and aggrieved Revenue took their case to the CESTAT.

The Bench considered the submissions and observed -

"3. It is seen that what the appellants are purchasing is a ship for the purpose of breaking. The appellants are breaking the ship and as a result certain items are recovered. The scrap so generated is sold by appellants on payment of central excise duty. Other items generated are sold by them as it is. The items in respect of which demands for revenue under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules have been made are not purchased by appellants but are part of the ship when it is imported. In this regard, the activity of the appellants cannot be considered as trading activity."

The Single Member Bench, therefore, held that the notice could not be sustained.

Nonetheless, while concluding the order, the Bench remarked that the "appeal was allowed".

We had while reporting the order - 2017-TIOL-3608-CESTAT-MUM pointed out that this was not what it ought to be.

Thankfully, the error has been rectified by issuance of a corrigendum which reads - in Para 4, the words:

"In view of the above, notice cannot be sustained and the appeal is consequently allowed."

be read as

"In view of the above, notice cannot be sustained and the appeal is consequently dismissed".

In passing:

All good things must come to an end - an old Proverb.

(See 2018-TIOL-2614-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.