News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Even if one of objects of assessee is to lend money, a single loan transaction is no business and hence, writing off bad debts is not allowable: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, SEPT 03, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether even though one of the company's objects includes money lending business but a single instant of loan cannot be acceptable as part of business and hence write off of bad debts cannot be allowed. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee company, publisher of newspaper and magazines, had filed return for relevant AY. One of the objects of the assessee company was to do money lending business. The assessee had granted advance of Rs. 1.60 Crores to one Mr. Sanjay Khemani during the FY 2000-01 against security of shares. The party had refunded a part of such amount by the end of the year 2001-02, and had also paid interest thereon. But the party did not refund any money after the year 2001- 02, and therefore the Board of the assessee decided to write off the loan as bad debt. During assessment, AO was of the view that only a trading debt could be written off. The assessee contended that since the loan given by the assessee fell within its objects, it could be only considered as a trading debt. But AO did not agreed and made disallowance of bad debts write off. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ though assessee say that one of its objects is to carry on business of money lending, obviously, it was only one of the incidental and/or other object and not its main object. That apart, it was found that the loan given to Mr. Sanjay Khemani was the sole instance of a loan given to any person other than those who were not related to its main business assessee. Hence, assessee's claim that it had advanced loan to Mr.Sanjay Khemani as a part of its business is not acceptable. As for the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/s TRF Ltd., relied on by the AR their Lordships did not hold that conditions set out in sections.36(1)(vii) and Sec.36(2) were not required to be satisfied while effecting a write off of bad debts. Therefore, the lower authorities were justified disallowing claim as bad debt write off. No reason was found to interfere with the orders of the lower authorities. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed, whereas the Cross-Objection filed by the assessee is dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1413-ITAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.