I-T - Even if one of objects of assessee is to lend money, a single loan transaction is no business and hence, writing off bad debts is not allowable: ITAT
By TIOL News Service
CHENNAI, SEPT 03, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether even though one of the company's objects includes money lending business but a single instant of loan cannot be acceptable as part of business and hence write off of bad debts cannot be allowed. YES IS THE ANSWER.
Facts of the case
The assessee company, publisher of newspaper and magazines, had filed return for relevant AY. One of the objects of the assessee company was to do money lending business. The assessee had granted advance of Rs. 1.60 Crores to one Mr. Sanjay Khemani during the FY 2000-01 against security of shares. The party had refunded a part of such amount by the end of the year 2001-02, and had also paid interest thereon. But the party did not refund any money after the year 2001- 02, and therefore the Board of the assessee decided to write off the loan as bad debt. During assessment, AO was of the view that only a trading debt could be written off. The assessee contended that since the loan given by the assessee fell within its objects, it could be only considered as a trading debt. But AO did not agreed and made disallowance of bad debts write off. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.
On appeal, Tribunal held that,
++ though assessee say that one of its objects is to carry on business of money lending, obviously, it was only one of the incidental and/or other object and not its main object. That apart, it was found that the loan given to Mr. Sanjay Khemani was the sole instance of a loan given to any person other than those who were not related to its main business assessee. Hence, assessee's claim that it had advanced loan to Mr.Sanjay Khemani as a part of its business is not acceptable. As for the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/s TRF Ltd., relied on by the AR their Lordships did not hold that conditions set out in sections.36(1)(vii) and Sec.36(2) were not required to be satisfied while effecting a write off of bad debts. Therefore, the lower authorities were justified disallowing claim as bad debt write off. No reason was found to interfere with the orders of the lower authorities. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed, whereas the Cross-Objection filed by the assessee is dismissed.
(See 2018-TIOL-1413-ITAT-MAD)
|