SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Delhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
I-T - Mandatory interest on share capital payable to members of co-operative bank can be allowed as an expenditure incurred for carrying on business: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

VISAKHAPATNAM, OCT 20, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether mandatory interest on share capital payable to the members of co-operative bank can be allowed as an expenditure incurred for carrying on the business and is not appropriation of profits. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee had filed return for relevant AY. During assessment, the AO found that the assessee had debited Rs.4,55,61,020/- for the assessment year 2012-13 towards the interest paid and out of which the amount of Rs. 23,64,321/- was paid towards interest on share capital for the year 2010-11. The AO issued the show cause notice calling the assessee's explanation as to why the interest on share capital should not be disallowed. The assessee filed the explanation stating that the interest on share capital was required to be paid to the members as compulsory obligation without any choice as per A.P. Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995. The Cooperative Law envisages membership fee as share capital and equity deposit and thereby provide for payment of mandatory interest on the amount so contributed by the members. Therefore requested the AO to allow the expenditure debited to the P&L account. The AO not being convinced with the explanation of the assessee disallowed the interest and added back to the income of assessee. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee on this ground. Aggrieved Revenue filed appeal before the Tribunal.

Tribunal held that,

++ CIT(A) followed the order of Tribunal in ITA Nos. 444 & 445, 449, 450/VIZ/2012, which is in favour of the assessee. Since the facts of the case are identical, respectfully following the view taken by the Coordinate Bench, it was decided to uphold the order of the CIT(A). However, it was observed from the order of the AO that the interest on share capital was related to the year 2010-11 which is relevant for the assessment year 2011-12, but not the impugned year. Neither the CIT(A) nor the AO has given a clear finding with regard to the correct assessment year in which the interest was accrued. Therefore, it was decided to remit the matter back to the file of the AO to examine the issue with regard to the accrual of liability as per the system of accounting followed by the assessee and decide the issue afresh on facts and merits. The appeal of the revenue on this issue is allowed for statistical purpose.

(See 2018-TIOL-1872-ITAT-VIZAG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST