News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
I-T - One time licence fee paid for setting up of retail outlet, before commencement of business, is to be capitalized; it is not revenue expenditure: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

VIZAG, OCT 26, 2018: THE Issue is - Whether one time licence fees paid for setting up of a retail outlet, and that too before commencement of business, is to be capitalized and cannot be claimed as revenue expenditure. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is an individual, owning a rice mill and also carrying on the business of retail outlet of petrol bunk. During the year under consideration, the assessee claimed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards licence fee which was disallowed by AO by holding the same as capital expenditure. It is observed by the AO from the details that the assessee had got a letter of intent for Retail outlet of Reliance petrol which was agreed, accepted and signed by the assessee and paid the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards signing fee. Since this amount was paid in the financial year 2004-05 but not during the current financial year of 2005-06, the AO held that the expenditure was neither incurred nor accrued in the concerned assessment year, and hence the same was not allowable as revenue expenditure in the year under consideration. The AO also observed that the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of setting up of Retail outlet, therefore, the expenditure was capital in nature. On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting and the assessee has paid the sum of Rs.3 lakhs as a signing fee for the training of the dealers and its staff and supervision and coordination of the construction of the retail outlet. The payment was made to the Reliance Industries in A.Y 2005-06 and the expenditure is related to the setting up of the retail outlet incurred before commencement of the business. When queried, the assessee's counsel submitted that the retail outlet of the Reliance unit was commissioned from Oct 01, 2005, whereas the expenditure was incurred on Aug 07, 2004 and the relevant assessment year was 2005-06, but not the year under consideration. Since the unit was commissioned on Oct 01, 2005 and the expenditure was incurred during the construction period before commencement of the business, the said expenditure cannot be related to the expenditure of the relevant assessment year;

++ the assessee's counsel did not provide details with regard to the dates of training given by the Reliance Industries to dealers and the staff. Similarly, no break up of the expenses incurred for the training & construction related activities were submitted. The signing fee was one time payment which was related to the setting up of construction of Reliance petrol pump unit and the expenditure was incurred prior to the commencement of the business, therefore, the contention of assessee that the expenditure be treated as revenue expenditure for the year under consideration, cannot be accepted. Since the expenditure was incurred before the commencement of business, the expenditure required to be capitalized or the same should be amortized as per section 35D.

(See 2018-TIOL-1931-ITAT-VIZAG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.