News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
I-T - Loss arising from foreign exchange fluctuation is not unascertained liability and need not be added back to the book profit u/s 115JA: HC

By TIOL News Service

MADRAS, NOVEMBER 19, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether the loss arising from foreign exchange fluctuation is an unascertained liability required to be added back to the book profit as per clause (c) of explanation to Section 115JA. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a Joint Venture between an American company and an Indian company. For the AY 1998-1999, the assessee filed return of income. A scrutiny order was passed and assessment was completed. Thereafter, a notice u/s 148 was issued for the reason that the loss arising on account of foreign exchange fluctuation amounting to Rs. 59,70,000/- was not allowable in the computation of income u/s 115JA of the Act, in so far as the same was an 'unascertained liability' for the purposes of computation of book profit u/s 115JA. Accordingly, the amount was treated as an unascertained liability and added back to the book profits in the computation of income under Section 115JA. On appeal, CIT(A) passed order in favour of assessee. On further appeal, Tribunal passed order in favour of Revenue.

High Court held that,

++ assessee's contention is that such loss arising from the foreign exchange fluctuation was determined with reference to rate of foreign exchange as on the last date of the financial year and was, therefore, an ascertained liability for the purpose of Clause (c) of Explanation to Section 115JA of the Act. The assessee further contended that for the import, the assessee had to effect payments on or before 31st March of the relevant year and the amount having not been paid, the rate of the foreign exchange as on 31st March was taken into account and accordingly, the same was calculated and therefore, it cannot be treated as an unascertained liability. Though the Revenue contended that the assessee has made only a provision, it was found that nowhere in the assessment proceedings such a statement was made. Even while passing the assessment order, the AO has shown the same as loss on account of exchange fluctuation and not as a provision. Therefore, the substantial question of law framed for consideration in the case on hand, requires to be answered in favour of the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-2440-HC-MAD-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.