News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Undisclosed business receipts, which are not recorded in books but found during search, is undisclosed income & attracts penalty: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

JAIPUR, DECEMBER 22, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether undisclosed business receipts, which are not recorded in the books of accounts and found as a result of search, is undisclosed income as defined in section 271AAB and penalty is rightly levied on the same. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a civil contractor. A search was conducted in the case of MRS Group to which the assessee belonged and in response to the notice issued u/s 153A, the assessee filed its return of income for the relevant year. In the return so filed, the assessee, declared an additional income of Rs. 96,50,946/- on account of undisclosed business receipts. As per AO, the additional income so declared by the assessee was duly covered under the provisions of Section 69A of the Act as unaccounted money, which are not recorded in the books of accounts and assessee had failed to offer any explanation about the source of the same. Accordingly, the same was brought to tax u/s 115BBE(1)(a) liable for tax @ 30%. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act. The AO also initiated penalty proceeding by issuance of notice u/s 271AAB r.w.s. 274 of the Act and imposed penalty of Rs. 40,57,188. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the search has been initiated and conducted on the assessee on 17.07.2013 and the due date of filing of return of income has not expired on the date of search and the assessee has not filed its return before the date of search. The assessee has filed its return of income pursuant to issuance of notice u/s 153A which has been assessed under section 143(3) r/w 153A of the Act. The penalty proceedings have been validly initiated by issuance of notice under section 274 read with section 271AAB of the Act;

++ regarding undisclosed business income of Rs. 96,50,946/-, it is noted that the same has been disclosed by the assessee in its return of income based on documents/loose papers found and impounded during the course of search and listed as per AS-1 to AS-26 of seized documents. These are documents regarding various business receipts and payments of the assessee not reflected in its regular books of accounts so these are clearly unrecorded transactions which have not been recorded in the books of accounts regularly maintained by the assessee before the date of search. Further, we have gone through the the submission of the assessee made before the DCIT during the course of assessment proceeding dated 16.02.2016 and it is noted that in its submission, the assessee has said very clearly that there is very close & inextricable linkage between the receipts and payments slips and therefore, the difference between the receipt totals of loose slips & payment totals amounting to Rs. 96 Lacs and odd has been surrendered and offered as income for the assessments year 2013-14 and which has subsequently been accepted by the AO. Therefore, as far as the said undisclosed business receipt (net of expenditure) is concerned, the same is clearly within the meaning of "undisclosed income" found as a result of search and which has not been recorded in the books of accounts maintained in the normal course relating to previous year relevant to impugned assessment year.

(See 2018-TIOL-2469-ITAT-JAIPUR)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.