News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
I-T - If AO makes complete enquiry for variation in stock value, it is not a fit case for invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 15, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether if AO makes complete enquiry for variation in stock value then it is not a fit case for invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

A survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was carried out at the premises of the assessee. Accordingly, return for the year was selected for scrutiny assessment. The AO passed assessment order u/s 143(3) of the act. The AO was convinced with the returned income of the assessee and accepted the same. Later on invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act, the PCIT issued a show cause notice to the assessee, as the PCIT was of the firm belief that the assessment framed was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. According to CIT there was variation in the value of stock and assessee did not make proper enquiry for same. The CIT set aside the assessment order. Aggrieved assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal.

Tribunal held that,

++ it is a settled position of law that the powers u/s 263 of the Act can be exercised by the Commissioner on satisfaction of twin conditions, namely, (i) the assessment order should be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. By erroneous, is meant contrary to law. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings made detail and specific enquiries in relation to stock and after making detailed enquiries, accepted reconciliation in the variation in the value of stock. Therefore, it cannot be said that the AO did not make any enquiry while framing the assessment order. The PCIT has grossly erred in observing that the Assessing Officer should have made a complete enquiry for the amount of excess stock at Rs. 9,95,72,922/- called for documentary evidence for purchase of gold and diamond and verified the genuineness. As the assessee had filed complete documentary evidences of purchase of gold and diamond and the Assessing Officer has verified the same. Even the alleged excess stock has been explained completely by filing a reconciliation statement. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that neither proper enquiries were made nor any investigation was made by the Assessing Officer;

++ Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co. observed that "the phrase "prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" has to be read as conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the Assessing Officer. Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an Income-tax Officer adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss of revenue; or where two views are possible and the Income-tax Officer has taken one view with which the Commissioner does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order prejudicial to the interests of the revenue unless the view taken by the Income-tax Officer is unsustainable in law." It was noted that the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) of the Act is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and the PCIT has erroneously assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

(See 2019-TIOL-137-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.