News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - Proceeds from sale of shares cannot be taxed as revenue receipts in hands of trust, if shares were held in fiduciary capacity and trust had acted as mere SPV of settler company: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JANUARY 30, 2019: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH IS - Whether when a trust is holding the shares in its fiduciary capacity and is acting as Special Purpose Vehicle of the settler company, then proceeds from sale of those shares cannot be treated as trust's business income. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is a Trust created by the employer, and as per the Trust deed, it was established for the welfare of the employees of the settler company. The activities of the Trust included investing in equity shares, to hold equity shares of the company and to administer the fund as instructed by the Compensation Committee for the benefit of the eligible employees. The Committee would recommend granting of options to the eligible employees. Such options would include a right to choose Employees Stock Option Scheme. The AO noted that during the year under consideration, several employees had exercised such option and the Trust had allotted shares to such employees in terms of their options. The proceeds received from the employees were recognized by the Trust as revenue receipt and shown as its long term capital gain. The AO however held that the same should be taxed as assessee's business income.

When the matter reached the Tribunal, it was held that the assessee was holding the shares in fiduciary capacity and that the proceeds could not be taxed as business income. The Tribunal observed that the AO had failed to appreciate complete facts in the right context.

High Court held:

++ this Court is in agreement with the view of the Tribunal. The nature of allotment of shares, the nature of stock option offered to the eligible employees as per the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and the corresponding revenue generated upon the eligible employees opting for such stock options, would be sufficient to hold that the proceeds cannot be treated as the Trust's business income. The Tribunal has observed that the assessee trust has been holding the shares in the fiduciary capacity. It could also be said, in other words, that the assessee trust is like a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) of the settler company, which has been formed for the special purpose of holding the shares of the settler company and issuing the same to the eligible employees, interalia, for the benefit of settler and its employees. It is acting as an extended arm of the settler company. It is not holding the shares in its own absolute rights, as has been contended by the Revenue also. Under these circumstances, it will be very difficult to categorise these shares as business assets, meant for trading by the assessee trust. No question of law in this respect therefore arises.

(See 2019-TIOL-238-HC-MUM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.