News Update

Delhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
I-T - Sec 80IA benefits are available to even franchisees of basic telephone service providers although it may only be erecting EPABX System: ITAT Special Bench

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 11, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) which is available to basic Telecom Service Providers is also available to franchisees of such service providers, even if it is only putting EPABX system. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee filed return of income for the relevant AY. The returned income was accepted. Subsequently, notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. On scrutiny of the accounts, the AO observed that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs. 2,07,91,043/- u/s 80IA of the Act. According to the assessee, it had shown income from telecommunication. It was submitted before the AO that in earlier years also such deduction was claimed by the assessee, it was disallowed by the AO. However, when dispute travelled to the Tribunal deduction was granted to the assessee. The AO observed that right from the AY 1997-98 to 2001-02 such deduction was disallowed to the assessee, though CIT(A) and Tribunal had allowed the deduction to the assessee, but department had not accepted the order of the Tribunal and carried the matter before the Gujarat High Court. The AO did not accept the claim of the assessee, because in earlier year, Department went in appeal before the High Court. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the claim of the assessee. On appeal, CIT(A) passed order in favour of Assessee.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ jurisdictional High Court has adjudicated this issue in favour of the assessee, wherein it has been held that the assessees who are franchisees of BSNL and who have been permitted to install, maintain and operate in dialing EPABX under the franchisees to support the department can be treated to have provided “basic telephone services". This would amount to creation of infrastructure entitling them for deduction under section 80IA. Relying on authoritative pronouncement of the jurisdictional High Court in the assessee's own case, it was viewed that question referred to Bench deserves to be answered in favour of the assessee, and against Revenue;

++ the appeal has also been transferred to the Special Bench. Considering the opinion of Special Bench coupled with ratio laid down by the High Court in assessee's own case, it was held that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) of the Act. The CIT(A) has rightly granted the same to the assessee. No merit was found in appeal of the Revenue. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

(See 2019-TIOL-624-ITAT-AHM-SB)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.