News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Tata Sons case - If no order passed under Ss 120 or 127, Addl CIT cannot put on AO's hat: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 15, 2019: THE issue before the bench is whether the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax is vested with the jurisdiction to assume the functions of an Assessing Officer, where no orders to such effect have been passed u/s 120(4)(b) or u/s 127(1) of the Act. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case

THE assessee is a leading industrial conglomerate. It filed its returns for the relevant AY, declaring total income of about Rs 21.99 crores. The assessment for such AY was completed with the assessee's income being calculated at about Rs 758.60 crores, with the order being passed by the jurisdictional Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. On appeal, the CIT(A) gave partial relief to the assessee. Before the Tribunal, the assessee raised an additional ground, stating that the order passed by the Addl. CIT was bad in law as the Addl. CIT failed to show the requisite jurisdiction u/s 120(4)(b) to pass the assessment order. The assessee claimed that the Addl. CIT could assume the functions of an AO only if specific directions to such effect are issued u/s 120(4)(b). The assessee further claimed that the assessment was to be completed by that authority which had initiated the assessment proceedings and that any other authority could assume proceedings only after a proper order of transfer u/s 127(1) or 127(2). The partial relief granted by the CIT(A) triggered the present cross appeals.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ a similar issue arose in the assessee's own case for a previous AY & so the decision laid down in Tata Sons Ltd. v. ACIT. Adhering to the principle of judicial discipline and following the findings laid down therein, it is held in the present case that the Addl. CIT in the absence of a valid order u/s 120(4)(b) as well as section 127(1) of the Act could not have exercised powers of an Assessing Officer to pass the assessment order. Accordingly, the assessment order is annulled. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue does not survive.

(See 2019-TIOL-643-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.