News Update

Sale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveysST - Since Department itself admits that service carried out by appellant is that of 'Mining Services' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, thus demand for earlier period has been made only to fasten excess Service Tax demand on appellant which cannot sustain: CESTATICG rescues fisherman with head injury onboard IFB St. Francis off the Gujarat coastCX - When physical stock verification carried out by Officers was not fool proof and there were anomalies, benefit of doubt should be extended to assessee, duty demand confirmed on alleged clandestine removal is not sustainable: CESTAT
 
I-T - Revenue is not permitted to make additions based on unrelated incriminating materials found during course of search, if no assessments are pending on date of search: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, MAR 22, 2019: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether once assessments stood concluded on the date of search and are not pending consideration, then no adjustment to returned income is permitted u/s 153A in absence of incriminating material. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee, an individual, had preferred present appeals challenging the jurisdiction usurped by the AO u/s 153A towards additions/disallowances made in the consequent assessment proceedings owing to search operations. The counsel for assessee submitted that the additions/disallowances made in both the appeals had no rational connection or live link with material found in the course of search action carried out u/s 132 in Sewani Group cases including assessee. The AR submitted that in pursuance of a notice u/s 153A for these assessment years in appeals, the assessment was inter alia completed for AYs 2008-09 & 2009-10. The assessment order was framed making certain additions and disallowances on re-appreciation of facts already disclosed/available with the department prior to search. It was further vehemently asserted that the adjustments made in the search assessments were possibly subject matter of regular assessment and did not resonate with the scheme of search assessment u/s 153A de hors reference to any incriminating material in this regard. The AR further emphasized that both these assessments stood concluded on the date of search and were not pending for assessment and hence in the absence of incriminating material, no adjustment in the returned income was permissible u/s 153A.

Tribunal held:

++ the first and foremost controversy that arises for adjudication is on the scope and ambit of assessment proceedings u/s 153A. The case propounded on behalf of the assessee that additions/disallowances made in Section 153A proceedings has no rational connection with incriminating material, if any, found as a result of search remains undisputed. It is also not dispute that assessment pertaining to the assessment years in question viz. AYs. 2008-09 & 2009-10 stood concluded either u/s 143(1) or u/s .143(3) and were not pending at the time of search. In the backdrop of these facts, it is straightway noticed that the scope of assessment u/s 153A in respect of completed assessment is circumscribed by the condition that the additions/disallowances must have some bearing with the incriminating material detected in the course of search. The scope of assessment u/s 153A in respect of concluded assessment is thus narrower in its sweep as held in long line of judicial precedents including the decision rendered by the Gujarat High Court in Devangi case. Thus, in the absence of any connection with the incriminating material, the additions/disallowances in respect of concluded assessments are not permissible in law.

(See 2019-TIOL-659-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.