News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
I-T - Revenue cannot tax capital gains when Sec 11(1) itself exempts such receipt if application of such gains is made for objects of Trust: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 27, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether Revenue can tax capital gains when Sec 11(1) itself exempts such receipt if application of such gains is made for objects of Trust. NO IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case   

The assessee is a Charitable Trust. During the relevant period, the Trust had granted tenancy rights in relation to two of its immovable properties. By way of premium, the Trust had received sum of Rs. 1.69 crores. Such income was applied by the Trust for the purpose of its charitable objects. Thereafter, the Trust filed its return in which said receipt was not offered to tax. The AO thereafter passed the order of assessment u/s 143(3) r/w/s 147 in which he held that said receipt was in the nature of capital gain upon transfer of capital asset. He was of the opinion that the assessee had not invested such capital gain as provided in Section 11(1A) and therefore, such receipt was not exempt from tax.

On appeal, the CIT(A) noted that the assessee had applied a sum of Rs. 4.72 crores towards the objects of the Trust. This included the receipt of Rs. 1.69 crores received by way of premium. On further apeal, the Tribunal confirmed the view of the CIT(A) observing that the total income credited to the account of the Trust was Rs. 3.29 crores and the application towards objects of the Trust was Rs. 4.72 crores. The Tribunal, therefore, held that the assessee had applied the said sum of Rs. 1.69 crores for the objects of the Trust.

On apeal, the HC held that,

++ it is noticed notice that Section 11 pertains to income from property held for charitable or religious purposes. U/s 11(1), subject to the provisions of Sections 62 to 63, the incomes specified in various clauses contained therein would not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income. Sub-section (1A) of Section 11 is enabling provision by which a Trust who has on transfer of capital asset made a capital gain, upon investment of such amount in another capital asset, would avoid payment of tax under a deeming fiction that such sum would be deemed to have been applied to charitable or religious purposes. This aspect clearly emerges from the explanatory notes to the provisions of Finance Act of 1971. Under these circumstances, it can be seen that the Revenue cannot target the assessee's capital gain with the aid of sub-section (1A) of Section 11 when in terms of subsection (1) to Section 11 itself, in view of the assessee's application of such gain for the objects of the Trust, there arose no tax liability.

(See 2019-TIOL-672-HC-MUM-IT )


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.