News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
I-T - Specific portion of object clause in Trust deed is not determinative to conclude that Trust is not charitable in nature so as to deny registration u/s 12A: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, APR 03, 2019: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH IS - Whether a specific portion of the object clause in the trust deed can be read in isolation to conclude that the Trust is not charitable in nature and hence disregard the application for registration u/s 12A. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is a trust seeking registration as a Charitable Trust u/s 12A, which was however rejected on the grounds that some of the objects of the trust were not in the nature of charitable purposes. The Commissioner also recorded that the trust deed gave full discretion to the trustees to utilize the income of the trust for any of the objects. In his opinion, therefore, the trustees could as well have utilized the income of the trust for non-charitable purposes.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that none of the objects of the trust were in the nature of charitable purposes. If the trust was not following its objectives, then it was always open for the AO to examine the same while granting exemption u/s 11.

High Court held:

++ this Court has perused the objects of the trust with a special focus on the objects which the Commissioner has referred to for holding that they are not charitable in nature. The Commissioner has referred to clause (f) of the objects but reproduced only part of it to contend that the object is "to convert plays into ..........episodes on T.V......." and this cannot be termed as charitable. In the opinion of this Court, the Commissioner has wholly misread the objects. Clause (e) is of the objects is to create a culture among the elite class of the society for considering work of art an asset than can be passed on to the next generation with pride and prestige. Immediately, following clause (f) which has not been fully reproduced by the Commissioner in his order is to write through or with the help of literary persons, of different aptitudes or classes, plays in art and culture and other languages on different topics, to translate plays written different languages into other languages, or to convert plays into drams in to short plays or episodes or T.V or radio plays. The Commissioner, thus, picked a portion of this clause in isolation to argue that the same was not charitable.

(See 2019-TIOL-729-HC-MUM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.