News Update

Rajya Sabha also passes Citizenship Amendment BillCabinet nod for Agreement on Social Security between India and Brazil (See 'taxindiainternational.com')Cabinet okays funding of Delhi Metro's three Priority Corridors of Phase - IVCCEA approves extension of PM's Package for Horticulture in UTsCabinet nod for increase in authorised capital for IIFCL (See 'tiolcorplaws.com')Cabinet okays 'Partial Credit Guarantee Scheme' for purchase of high-rated pooled assets by PSBs (See 'tiolcorplaws.com')Cabinet approves IBC (Second Amendment) Bill, 2019 (See 'tiolcorplaws.com')GST - GSTR-1 is declaration of tax liability and GSTR-3B is evidence of actual payment - Petitioner has filed GSTR-1 but not GSTR-3B - Revenue is simply pressing upon for actual payment - claim of petitioner that s.79 can be invoked only after invoking s. 78 of Act, is, therefore, erroneous:HCCBIC gives addl charge to JS NegiFraud by e-Commerce Companies - File FIR if they are not traceable: GovtIndustrial Corridors - Onus is on States to acquire land towards their equity: GoyalWTO General Council decides to extend moratorium on electronic transmissionsProfiteering - Additional benefit given to one recipient cannot be offset with the denial of benefit to another recipient as this is not spirit of law: NAASection 171 of CGST Act nowhere mentions that investigation should be done only for State where complaint is filed and not for other States: NAAKeyword is 'commensurate reduction' - amount of profiteering has to be calculated by keeping recipient at centre and, therefore, contention that amount of profiteering has to be calculated entity-wise is not correct interpretation of law: NAARule 133 of CGST Rules - Time period for Authority to pass order after receipt of report from DGAP has been increased to six months by notification 31/2019-CT: NAASC keen to appoint former SC Judge to probe into Hyderabad encounterCus - Once a review Committee has taken a decision of not filing appeal, they become functus officio , and such decision cannot be re-opened or revised by a new Committee: CESTATPSLVC48 carrying 9 customer satellites and earth observation satellite successfully lifts offAs net interest income exceeds interest expenses, there cannot be any disallowance of interest expenses if no interest expense is claimed in P&L A/c: ITATST - Assessee is engaged in marketing and promotion of pesticides/insecticide manufactured by their principal - services rendered by assessee as super distributor are agriculture extension services which are covered under negative list as per section 65B(4) of FA, 1994: CESTATClaim of deduction on interest expenditure merits being allowed to extent of interest income received from various parties: ITATIf bill of exchange found during search relates to AY 2005-06, then no addition pertaining to it can be made in AY 2006-07: ITATProvisions of Section 40A come into operation only when payment in cash, in single day, exceeds specified limit of twenty thousand: ITATIGST to States - The Revised GoMOcean Freight and GST- Are We Missing Something?GST - N K Singh favours design changeArms Amendment Bill - Govt to introduce bullets with serial numbers soon: MoSGovt Keen to trim Central Deputation quota for IPS as States show reluctance to release officers30 Cr vehicles plying on road - Steps being taken to promote e-Vehicles: GovtGST - Law Committee to hold two-day meet starting todayThere is no universal yardstick to estimate profit derived from bogus purchase: ITATGovt trying to further simplify export procedures: Puri
 
Retrospective reversal of ITC for real estate sector - An 'unreal' welfare?

APRIL 26, 2019

By Puneet Bansal, Managing Partner, NITYA Tax Associates

"You can't build a great building on a weak foundation. You must have a solid foundation if you're going to have a strong superstructure"

- Gordon B. Hinckley

It is a universal truth that when the basics are right, everything falls in place! Without a good drawing, a beautiful painting will never emerge. The same principle applies to laws as well. Without good legislation, the law becomes ineffective. The aforesaid holds true in the light of recent amendments introduced for the real estate sector under GST.

Since the introduction of GST in India, the government has been appreciably proactive and has always endeavoured to simplify the new indirect tax regime. However, the amendments in the real estate sector effective from April 1, 2019 have been an exception and one of the most complex set of changes introduced in the GST regime till date.

While the intent of the government to reduce the rate of tax was noble, the execution has been hasty and totally unprepared. Seamless flow of credit is one of the basic tenets of the GST regime. However, Input Tax Credit ('ITC') was not allowed for supply of goods / services falling under the tax slab of 5 percent or lower such as restaurant services, canteen services etc. Recently, the real estate sector has also been added to this list. The law seems to treat such supplies as 'exempt' and accordingly warrants ITC reversal on the same. This is where the issue arises!

'Exempt': To be or not to be? - An Analysis

As per GST law, a registered person is entitled to take ITC to the extent it attributes to taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies1. Correspondingly, ITC attributable to exempt supplies needs to be reversed in the prescribed manner2. Effective April 1, 2019, ITC needs to be reversed on carpet area basis in case of construction services.

The moot question that needs to be answered is whether construction services would constitute to be an 'exempt supply' in the first place or not? As per Section 2(47) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act'), an exempt supply means a supply attracting nil rate of tax or wholly exempt from tax. An exempt supply also includes a non-taxable supply within its ambit i.e. a supply not leviable to tax under GST.

It is pertinent to note that the above definition only includes supply which is wholly exempt from tax. On the other hand, construction services are not wholly exempt from tax but are partly exempt. This is in contradistinction with pre-GST regime wherein the definition of 'exempted service' specifically covered service whose part of value was exempt subject to non-availment of credit. The extension in definition of 'exempted service' in pre-GST regime took place with effect from July 1, 2012; however, such services / supply does not qualify as 'exempt supply' under the GST regime.

The next relevant point for consideration is presence (or absence) of specific provision that can warrant ITC reversal validly claimed till March 31, 2019.

Section 18(4) of the CGST Act is a statutory provision that prescribes reversal of ITC where a supply becomes wholly exempt. Even this provision does not envisage a situation wherein a supply becomes partly exempt like construction services in the instant case. Thus, there is a casus omissus i.e. lack of statutory provision that can warrant reversal of ITC taken by real estate companies till March 31, 2019.

A similar controversy arose prior to GST regime as well wherein the tax authorities sought reversal of credit attributable to goods lying in stock on the day on which the taxpayer's goods became exempt. Prior to March 1, 2007, there was no statutory provision like Section 18(4) of the CGST Act mandating such reversal. The Courts consistently held that at the time when the taxpayer purchased the goods and took credit, it was valid. A subsequent exemption granted to such goods will not make such credit invalid. The Courts relied on the case of Collector of Central Excise v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited, - 2002-TIOL-79-SC-CX-LB wherein the Supreme Court held that credit is indefeasible and in absence of any provision providing for reversal of credit, the authorities cannot demand reversal of credits.

Conclusion

The reversal of ITC in case of construction services can be triggered only when the statute contains a specific provision to that effect. In the instant case as well, a statutory provision dealing with reversal of ITC in respect of partly exempt supply is conspicuously missing. The above discussion holds true with regard to ITC already availed by real estate companies prior to April 1, 2019 and can be successfully challenged before the Courts.

In view of the authors, the proposed mechanism seeking reversal of ITC on procurements made by construction companies till March 31, 2019, cannot be enforced. However, prospectively, Section 11 of the CGST Act and Section 6 of the IGST Act empower the government to grant full or part exemption subject to conditions, one of which can be ITC reversal. Thus, going forward, non-availability of ITC on procurements post April 1, 2019 is valid.

The government has been quite good in making things smooth for the taxpayers in recent times. However, looking at this basic loophole, it can safely be said that too much of a good thing can be 'tax'ing!

(Article co-authored by Ashutosh Mishra, Associate, NITYA Tax Associates. The views expressed are strictly personal.)

1Section 17(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

2Rule 42 and Rule 43 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Retrospective reversal of ITC for real estate sector - An unreal' welfare

Sir, I think Para 2(iv) of Notification no 11 of2017-CTR takes care of reversal so as to avail concessional rate. The said para reads : Wherever a rate has been prescribed in this notification subject to the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods or services used in supplying the service has not been taken, it shall mean that,

(a) credit of input tax charged on goods or services used exclusively in supplying such service has not been taken; and

(b) credit of input tax charged on goods or services used partly for supplying such service and partly for effecting other supplies eligible for input tax credits, is reversed as if supply of such service is an exempt supply and attracts provisions of sub-section (2) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder.
Kindly examine.... Mallikarjun Reddy,7702620004;

Posted by mallikarjun reddy c