News Update

COVID-19: India tests more than 6 lakh in 24 hours for second day in a rowCBIC issues attachment order of three senior IRS officersPersistent lockdown further slows down Services PMI for July monthNoted singer S P Balasubrahmanyam tests positive for COVID-19Slump sale versus Transfer of going business and Merger under GSTInventory Write-off - Post-GST & Pre-GST (See 'THE INSIGHT' in Taxongo.com)Massive fire in Beirut warehouse of flammable materials - Over 50 killed & 500 injuredGST Compensation - Gift, Statute, Trust?ST - No service tax payable under 'reverse charge mechanism' in respect of service charges paid to Rajasthan Police who are peforming statutory function of safeguarding currency chest: CESTATCus - 'GoPro HERO5 Black' Action Camera is classifiable under CTH 8525 8020 and entitled for benefit of duty exemption provided under 50/2017-Cus: CESTATFaceless Assessment - Over 58K cases selected to be disposed off by mid-September: CBDTST - Mining as a separate category of service liable to Service Tax was introduced only w.e.f. 01/06/2007, therefore, no demand prior to this date: CESTATCX - Buyers' premises can never be place of removal - Therefore, no CENVAT credit is admissible on outward transportation of goods even though sale of goods is on FOR destination basis: CESTATST - Activity of conducting Government transactions on behalf of RBI, carried out by assessee-bank, is of the nature of sovereign function performed on behalf of the Government & hence is not taxable: CESTATCOVID-19: Recovered cases now more than double of Active casesCus - Betel Nuts are not notified goods u/s 123 of Customs Act & so onus of proving foreign origin & smuggled nature of a particular consignment, rests with the Revenue - seizure of such goods is not tenable where proper documents are submitted by importer: CESTATOrder passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) is not sustainable where the officer who passed such order is not vested with jurisdiction over TDS matters: ITAT10,000 participants competed for 36 hours in 4th edition of Smart India HackathonTax and interest liability computed by AO on a different sheet of paper, will form part of the assessment order where the AO approves such computation immediately or some time later: ITATUnder PMGKAY-2, total 44.08 LMT food grains lifted by StatesProvision for costs on completed contracts based on identified & ascertained present liabilities, is allowed where based on technical assessments & projections of project managers, who are experts in their field: ITATDGFT allows export of all ventilators including breathing devicesCOVID-19: Global tally rises to 1.86 Crore & Death toll rises to 7 lakhDifficulty in activation of TAN & being informed about TDS liability only upon receiving demand notice, is sufficient plea to explain delay in filing returns: ITATRetailing of petro products - Govt eases guidelinesBihar Govt recommends CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput case
 
Retrospective reversal of ITC for real estate sector - An 'unreal' welfare?

APRIL 26, 2019

By Puneet Bansal, Managing Partner, NITYA Tax Associates

"You can't build a great building on a weak foundation. You must have a solid foundation if you're going to have a strong superstructure"

- Gordon B. Hinckley

It is a universal truth that when the basics are right, everything falls in place! Without a good drawing, a beautiful painting will never emerge. The same principle applies to laws as well. Without good legislation, the law becomes ineffective. The aforesaid holds true in the light of recent amendments introduced for the real estate sector under GST.

Since the introduction of GST in India, the government has been appreciably proactive and has always endeavoured to simplify the new indirect tax regime. However, the amendments in the real estate sector effective from April 1, 2019 have been an exception and one of the most complex set of changes introduced in the GST regime till date.

While the intent of the government to reduce the rate of tax was noble, the execution has been hasty and totally unprepared. Seamless flow of credit is one of the basic tenets of the GST regime. However, Input Tax Credit ('ITC') was not allowed for supply of goods / services falling under the tax slab of 5 percent or lower such as restaurant services, canteen services etc. Recently, the real estate sector has also been added to this list. The law seems to treat such supplies as 'exempt' and accordingly warrants ITC reversal on the same. This is where the issue arises!

'Exempt': To be or not to be? - An Analysis

As per GST law, a registered person is entitled to take ITC to the extent it attributes to taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies1. Correspondingly, ITC attributable to exempt supplies needs to be reversed in the prescribed manner2. Effective April 1, 2019, ITC needs to be reversed on carpet area basis in case of construction services.

The moot question that needs to be answered is whether construction services would constitute to be an 'exempt supply' in the first place or not? As per Section 2(47) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act'), an exempt supply means a supply attracting nil rate of tax or wholly exempt from tax. An exempt supply also includes a non-taxable supply within its ambit i.e. a supply not leviable to tax under GST.

It is pertinent to note that the above definition only includes supply which is wholly exempt from tax. On the other hand, construction services are not wholly exempt from tax but are partly exempt. This is in contradistinction with pre-GST regime wherein the definition of 'exempted service' specifically covered service whose part of value was exempt subject to non-availment of credit. The extension in definition of 'exempted service' in pre-GST regime took place with effect from July 1, 2012; however, such services / supply does not qualify as 'exempt supply' under the GST regime.

The next relevant point for consideration is presence (or absence) of specific provision that can warrant ITC reversal validly claimed till March 31, 2019.

Section 18(4) of the CGST Act is a statutory provision that prescribes reversal of ITC where a supply becomes wholly exempt. Even this provision does not envisage a situation wherein a supply becomes partly exempt like construction services in the instant case. Thus, there is a casus omissus i.e. lack of statutory provision that can warrant reversal of ITC taken by real estate companies till March 31, 2019.

A similar controversy arose prior to GST regime as well wherein the tax authorities sought reversal of credit attributable to goods lying in stock on the day on which the taxpayer's goods became exempt. Prior to March 1, 2007, there was no statutory provision like Section 18(4) of the CGST Act mandating such reversal. The Courts consistently held that at the time when the taxpayer purchased the goods and took credit, it was valid. A subsequent exemption granted to such goods will not make such credit invalid. The Courts relied on the case of Collector of Central Excise v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited, - 2002-TIOL-79-SC-CX-LB wherein the Supreme Court held that credit is indefeasible and in absence of any provision providing for reversal of credit, the authorities cannot demand reversal of credits.

Conclusion

The reversal of ITC in case of construction services can be triggered only when the statute contains a specific provision to that effect. In the instant case as well, a statutory provision dealing with reversal of ITC in respect of partly exempt supply is conspicuously missing. The above discussion holds true with regard to ITC already availed by real estate companies prior to April 1, 2019 and can be successfully challenged before the Courts.

In view of the authors, the proposed mechanism seeking reversal of ITC on procurements made by construction companies till March 31, 2019, cannot be enforced. However, prospectively, Section 11 of the CGST Act and Section 6 of the IGST Act empower the government to grant full or part exemption subject to conditions, one of which can be ITC reversal. Thus, going forward, non-availability of ITC on procurements post April 1, 2019 is valid.

The government has been quite good in making things smooth for the taxpayers in recent times. However, looking at this basic loophole, it can safely be said that too much of a good thing can be 'tax'ing!

(Article co-authored by Ashutosh Mishra, Associate, NITYA Tax Associates. The views expressed are strictly personal.)

1Section 17(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

2Rule 42 and Rule 43 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Retrospective reversal of ITC for real estate sector - An unreal' welfare

Sir, I think Para 2(iv) of Notification no 11 of2017-CTR takes care of reversal so as to avail concessional rate. The said para reads : Wherever a rate has been prescribed in this notification subject to the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods or services used in supplying the service has not been taken, it shall mean that,

(a) credit of input tax charged on goods or services used exclusively in supplying such service has not been taken; and

(b) credit of input tax charged on goods or services used partly for supplying such service and partly for effecting other supplies eligible for input tax credits, is reversed as if supply of such service is an exempt supply and attracts provisions of sub-section (2) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder.
Kindly examine.... Mallikarjun Reddy,7702620004;

Posted by mallikarjun reddy c