News Update

Israel-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?I-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCIsrael finally moving ahead with Rafah OperationsGST - Registration cancelled retrospectively on ground that physical verification revealed that the firm was non-existent - Petitioner had informed that they shifted business and had sought cancellation of registration - Order cancelling registration modified: HCNorway oil major boss says Europeans are not hard-working as compared to AmericansGST - Since registration was cancelled, petitioner could not access portal and view the SCNs and file replies - Order set aside and matter remitted: HCJio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficGST - Reply filed is a detailed one and if the proper officer was of the view that the same was unsatisfactory, he should have specifically sought further details - Matter is remitted: HCGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his healthGST - SCN does not put petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively - Order set aside and registration restored: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Non-application of mind - Proper officer has merely observed that the reply filed is unclear and unsatisfactory and, therefore, the demand is confirmed - Matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesCommercial Tax - Judgment of High Court is in jeopardy once appeal is entertained by Supreme Court - Appeals shall remain pending before the Appellate Board, Bench at Indore, till the issue is decided by Apex Court: HCUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranST - As the job-work undertaken by appellant amounts to manufacture, service tax cannot be levied on them under both Heads 'Business Auxiliary Service' and 'Business Support Service': CESTATRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyCX - Existence of corroborative evidence is essential in order to establish clandestine removal of goods and same cannot be merely based on assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT
 
DRI detects duty evasion to tune of Rs 15 Cr; M/s Future Enterprises CFO arrested

 

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, JULY 14, 2019: THE DRI sleuths received specific intelligence that M/s. Future Enterprises Ltd. was importing readymade garments from Bangladesh through Petrapole LCS without payment of Basic Customs Duty, availing SAFTA benefit of Customs exemption. By the said exemption notification, Government of India has exempted certain goods from Customs duty when imported into India from countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal and Afghanistan, provided that the importer proves that the goods, in respect of which the benefit of this exemption is claimed, are of the origin of the country mentioned above in accordance with the Rules of Determination of Origin of Goods under the Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), 2006.

In course of investigation, it was found that in the country of origin certificates furnished by the importer in terms of the Agreement on SAFTA, the value of goods (garments) as ostensibly manufactured in Bangladesh, was shown to be much less than the actual value of these goods. Thus, a higher value addition was shown to have taken place in Bangladesh in order to meet the requirement under SAFTA of at least 40% value addition for the goods to be called as of ’Bangladeshi origin’ in order to avail the benefit of duty free imports. This is when the investigation reveals actual value addition in Bangladesh to be lower than 40%.

Investigations further reveal that the Garments were supplied by third country suppliers based in Dubai and Singapore, but were delivered from Bangladesh after some minimal processing, not enough as per the norms for the product to be called as of Bangladeshi origin. The value declared in the Bill of Entry submitted before the Indian Customs was the value charged by the third country suppliers to M/s. Future Enterprises Ltd., whereas, the value mentioned in the SAFTA certificate was the charge paid by the third country suppliers to the Bangladeshi manufacturers. Investigation reveals that the third country suppliers had supplied some raw materials and accessories free of cost to the Bangladeshi manufacturers. Value of such raw materials and accessories was not included in the final total value of the goods manufactured by the Bangladeshi manufacturers, when it should have been. Thus, a lower value of the finished goods was mentioned in the SAFTA certificate of origin to show a corresponding higher value addition. However, when the value of these Free of Cost materials (raw materials and accessories) is included in the total value, then the importer would be ineligible to avail the SAFTA benefit, as the threshold limit of third country content would be exceeded and the value addition that occurred in Bangladesh would fall below the minimum acceptable as per the rules.

The original consignments were imported between the period June 2017 to January 2018. Total FOB value of the goods imported under 83 consignments is Rs. 35.91 Crores and Customs duty liability is Rs. 14.58 Crores. After the difference in value was pointed out to M/s. Future Enterprises Ltd., they tried to mischievously get the SAFTA certificates of origin revised from Bangladesh. M/s. Future Enterprises Ltd. procured 22 revised certificates of origin from Bangladesh which were re-issued more than six months after import of the garments. Only those certifcates were picked up for a fradulent ‘revison’ which accounted more than 90% of the duty liability in order to circumvent the same. However, as per SAFTA Rules of Origin the certificate of origin needs to be issued at the time of exportation or within 3 working days from the date of shipment. In exceptional cases where certificate of origin has not been issued due to involuntary errors or omissions or other valid causes, the Certificate of Origin may be issued retrospectively but no longer than 45 days from the date of shipment. Thus in this case, as the revised certificates were issued more than six months after importation, they have no legal validity and have been issued in clear violation of the presribed rules.

Mr Dinesh Maheshwari, CFO & Executive Director of Future Enterprises Ltd. was responsible for entire finanacial matters including taxtion issues for the company. In a statement recorded by DRI, the Sourcing head of the company responsible for procurement of the goods from Bangladesh / UAE, mentioned that the finanical and taxation matters pertaining to the imports so done were looked after by the Financial and Commercial vertical of the company, which is headed by Mr Maheshwari as the CFO.

When confronted with the fraud details over repeated summons on different dates issued to him by the DRI, each time, Shri Dinesh Maheshwari gave evasive answers such as ‘I will get back after checking’. When asked, why one after the other, over import of 83 consigenments over a period of 6 months, the duty exmeption benefits have been taken by them repeatdely in this incorrect manner, there was no explaination. Therefore, as he appears to be the main peson responsible for the evasion of duty to the tune of Rs. 14.58 Crores by M/s. Future Enterprises Ltd., he appears to be guilty of an offence punishable under Section 135 of the Customs Act and has therefore been arrested under Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962 on 12th July 2019.

These kind of cases invlolving abuse of Free Trade Agreements directly affect the ‘Make in India’ campiagn of the country and distort the level playing field for genuine Indian manufacturers.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.