Budget 2024 Updates

TN Chief Minister to boycott NITI Aayog Saturday meeting as TN gets nothing from BudgetBudget 2024 promotes New income tax regime; offers new tax slabs as sopBudget bonanza for MSMEs - Easier access to credit; boosting export capacityThe GST Summons: A relative can appear!Conditions for revocation of cancellation of registration - May be, maybe not!FM offers fiscal sops if land reforms are done within next 3 yrsAngel tax dumped for all classes of investorsDeduction hiked on non-govt employers' contribution to pension schemeBudget 2024: Gold, Cellphones, Cancer medicine now cheaperBenami Act: Immunity can now be withdrawn on IO reportBenami Act: 90 days time limit proposed to reply to noticeTPO gets powers to deal with domestic transactionsOne more Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme; Date to be notifiedNo deduction u/s 37 for settlement amount if paid for violation of any lawFM proposes to lessen tedium of TDS; reduces rates in many casesFM overhauls capital gains regime; to come into play from todayFM hikes exemption limit for long-term capital gain to Rs 1.25 lakh + hikes tax rate to 12.5% on specified financial assetsTourism: Temple corridors to be developed in BiharCGST - Finance Bill proposes to amend Sec 9 to take ENA out of purview of GST + inserts Sec 11A to regularise non-levy of tax on general practice in tradeCGST - Sub-sections to be inserted in Act to relax time-limit to avail ITC u/s 16(4) + New Sec 74A proposed to provide for common time limit for demand notices in fraud cases3.4% of GDP allocated as Capital expenditure to support infra sectorCGST - Proviso to be inserted in Sec 30(2) to provide for enabling conditions for revocation of registration + Amendment in Sec 39 to mandate return filing by TDS deductors even if there is no deduction in a particular monthIGST - Amendment proposed to prohibit refund of unutilised ITC on zero-rated supplyIncome tax - Finance bill revamps re-assessment regime againCustoms - Finance Bill proposes to amend Sec 28DA for acceptance of different types of proof of origin under FTAsFM hikes standard deduction to Rs 75K for new ITR regime + revises tax rates for all income slabs + Rs 7000 Cr revenue foregoneIncome tax - Search & Seizure cases - Block assessment is backBudget withdraws 2% equalisation levyFM reduces corporate tax rate for foreign companies to 35%FM proposes vivad se vishwas scheme + hikes monetary limits for filing appealsFM proposes 20% capital gains tax on short-term assets + listed financial assets held for more than one year to be classified as long-termGovt scraps TDS on Mutual Funds + decriminalises delay in depositing TDS + rationalisation of compounding of offences + revamps reassessment periodBudget proposes comprehensive review of I-T Act, 1961 + simplifies provisions for charities and TDSFM reduces customs duty on gold and silver to 6% + Nil BCD on nickel cathodeBudget proposes to reduce BCD on mobile phone and chargers to 15% + exempts 25 minerals from customs dutyFM exempts cancer medicines from Customs duty + amends BCD for various machinesFM proposes Rs 48 lakh expenditure outlay; 4.9% fiscal deficitFM announces Rs 1 lakh crore fund for developing space economyPromotion of Tourism - Vishnupad temple and Bodh Gaya temple corridors to be supportedFM announces over Rs 11 lakh crore capital expenditure in current fiscalGovt to invest in small Nuclear energy plants in partnership with private playersCentre to ask States to lower stamp duty for women purchasers of housesIBC - More Benches of NCLT to be set up to speed up recoveryFM spikes limit of Mudra loan to Rs 20 lakhsBudget offers financial aid to labour-intensive MSMEs in manufacturing sectorGovt announces 3 crore additional houses under PM SchemeGovt to secure Rs 15K loan for AP from multilateral agenciesGovt to frame new policy for all-round development of Bihar, Jharkhand and OdishaGovt to give one-month salary to all new recruits in formal sector through EPFOGovt to promote vegetable clusters closer to urban settlementsGovt to focus on productivity of agriculture with climate-resilient seedsFM allocates Rs 2 lakh outlay for PM's five schemes for job creation and farmersFM Nirmala Sitharaman presents 7th Union Budget in ParliamentBudget 2024: FM arrives at Parliament; Speech to begin at 11AMEconomic Survey 2023-24 - from GST PerspectiveUkrainian FM goes on tour to ChinaI-T- Additions framed u/s 69A are untenable where affidavits submitted by assessee's parents to explain source of cash deposits, were discarded by AO without consideration : ITATSurvey acknowledges productivity loss due to mental health disordersI-T- Short term capital gains returned by the assessee in terms of provisions of section 50 of the Act on assets held for a period of more than 36 months be treated as long term capital gains: ITATExpenditure on social services up from 6.7% to 7.8% of GDP: SurveyI-T-Additions framed u/s 68 are upheld where assessee is unable to prove genuineness of transaction involving purchase and sale of penny stock: ITATTrade deficit contracts to USD 78 bn from USD 126 bn in 2023I-T-Re-assessment is invalidated when there is no failure on part of assessee to make full and true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATCorporate profitability has peaked to 15-yr-old high between 2020-2023: SurveyI-T- When cash generated out of sales has been credited in the books of accounts, the provisions of Sec.69A could not be invoked: ITATBudget 2024: More relief for senior citizens & individual taxpayers on card; tweaking of capital gains tax likely; steady capital expenditure to stayI-T- If any amount invested is purely a strategic investment & for purpose of commercial expediency, then AO cannot hold such investments to be for non-business purpose: ITATGoogle backpedals on plan to scrap cookies from ChromeCus - For a HNWI individual, an expensive watch of 'Rolex' make would be his personal effect but same may not be the case if the person is of mere means - Pendant studded with diamonds not liable for confiscation: HCGovt amends Recruitment Rules for Debts Recovery TribunalGST - Even if no date, time or place of hearing is indicated in the notice issued, it was the duty of assessee to file his reply to SCN, which was admittedly received - Plea regarding violation of principles of natural justice cannot be countenanced: HCAbhinav Bindra conferred with Olympic OrderGST - Mismatch between value of e-way bills generated on portal and returns filed in Form GSTR-3B - Petitioner did not provide a comprehensive explanation - To remit sum of Rs.3.50 crores within six weeks - Matter remanded: HCHackers mercilessly hack Bangladesh PM’s website along with police portalsGST - Rule 30 of Rules, 2017 - Assessing officer ought to have issued summons and obtained clarification rather than estimating the outward supply value at 110% of purchase value - Order set aside and matter remanded subject to remit of 10% disputed tax demand: HCUS law-makers call for resignation of Secret Service chief in Trump assassination caseGST - Net ITC shown incorrectly - An inadvertent error was committed and such error was rectified, albeit irregularly, however, sum recovered from petitioner's bank account - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCKarnataka IT Industries piling pressure on govt to extend working hoursGST - Since notification is declared unconstitutional, Amount of IGST paid pursuant to Entry No. 10 of Notification No. 10 of 2017 is to be refunded along with statutory interest: HCStudy says earth’s water depleting fastFDI inflows slide to USD 26.5 bn in 2024 from USD 42 bn in 2023: Economic Survey
 
PM's Population Worry Too Little & Too Late

AUGUST 27, 2019

By Naresh Minocha, Consulting Editor

"NETAJI Bose would be extremely concerned at the state of affairs in India today", stated Narendra Modi as Gujarat Chief Minister on 6th July 2012. He was speaking at a function in Ahmedabad to mark foundation of Azad Hind Fauj.

Netaji would indeed be worried at political half-heartedness in grappling with population explosion (PE). It is an issue that perturbed him. As President of Congress Party, he minced no words in identifying as PE as the country's foremost challenge.

Addressing 51 st Congress Session at Haripura in Gujarat on 19th February 1938, Subhas Chandra Bose said: "With regard to the long-period programme for a free India, the first problem to tackle is that of our increasing population".

He stated: "I simply want to point out that where poverty, starvation and disease are stalking the land, we cannot afford to have our population mounting up by thirty million during a single decade. If the population goes up by leaps and bounds, as it has done in the recent past, our plans are likely to fall through".

He added: "It is not necessary at this stage to prescribe the methods that should be adopted to prevent a further increase in population but I would urge that public attention be drawn to this question".

If pre-partition India added 30 million to its population in 1930s in 10 years, post-partition India added 370 million in 18.5 years since 2000, a rate 20 times the one that rattled Netaji.

Demographic experts would be wondering why Prime Minister Narendra Modi didn't invoke his role models Netaji or Vajpayeeji to add value to his maiden (as PM) concern over PE.

Late Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who risked his popularity ratings for national interests, gave a stern message to the nation on 11th May 2000. As PM, he stated: "Today, India's population has crossed the one billion mark. This is a serious matter that is both cause for concern and introspection -- concern over the impact that a runaway population growth is bound to have on the nation's economic, natural and other resources; introspection over where we went wrong and how we can stabilise our population".

He added: "If the present growth rate of our population remains unchecked, India will become the world's most populous country by the middle of this century, with people clamouring for a share of shrinking natural resources. Essential requirements like drinking water, shelter and health will be difficult to meet. Moreover, there is no way that generation of employment opportunities, creation of physical infrastructure and maintenance of public services can keep pace with a runaway population growth".

Sitting in heaven, Netaji might be discussing the demographic disaster with other India's greats who too were concerned about unabated population growth before the Independence. These include Gurdev Ravindranath Tagore. Dr. B.RAmbedkar, Mahatma Gandhi, Mrs. Sarojini Naidu and Sir Joseph Bhore, who chaired Health Survey & Development Committee. This eye-opener, published in 1946, is the best yardstick to measure inclusive growth.

Eighty years after Netaji's speech, Mr. Modi finally mustered courage to say a few words on PE in his Independence Day address to the Nation on 15th August 2019. He merely urged the Nation to ponder over and debate population explosion. This sounds like a whimper when compared to his call for "revolutionary steps" to check this "biggest national crisis" that he made as Chief Minister in October 2004.

And his homework-averse critics were quick to attack Mr. Modi's humble appeal to the citizens. He urged them to introspect over the benefits that small families reap for themselves as well as for the Nation.

On 16th August 2019, a leading daily, for instance, carried an editorial headlined "India no longer has a 'population explosion' problem. Coercive population control must be avoided".

The critics forgot that Mr. Modi's predecessors spoke boldly and repeatedly from ramparts of Red Fort & from other platforms. Several previous regimes either proposed or took stronger initiatives to manage the population bomb.

What Modi critics don't see is the fact that absolute number of poor is far more today than in 1938. The number of people living in slums is many-fold higher. So is the number of famished mothers. Similarly, the number of stunted children is much more.

Hunger and Malnutrition are India's national shame. We are the world's capital for many diseases that can be linked to malnutrition, poverty and abuse of reproductive rights. Unemployment and underemployment is touching sky-high. Size of farm holdings has declined so much that whole-time farming can't sustain countless households.

People are increasingly getting at each others throat for every inch of space & for every bucket of water. Look at number of deaths due to violence over parking & water queues. Look at recent bloodshed in villages in Uttar Pradesh and Telangana.

With paltry 2.4% of landmass, India is home to 17.74% of the global population. Entire Indian population is "water stressed" as water availability is below the annual per capita norm of 1700 cubic metres.

Per capita availability of resources is either declining or growing at a rate that is too low for dignified living by all citizens. Even Ostrich would not hide its face in sand from this stark reality.

India's population has grown from an estimated 30-32 crore after 1947 partition to estimated 137 crore as on 21August 2019 as per data generated by Worldometers, an independent international statistics generating entity.

Similarly, in its 3rd meeting in May 2019, the Government's Technical Group on Population Projections, estimated India's population at 153.6 crore for year 2036.

India would not have come to such a pass had political class, as a whole, not paid lip service to the population control. Today 'Agenda for India' (AFI) is anathema for all political parties & mainstream media, excluding few enlightened MPs.

Mind you AFI was unanimously passed by both houses of Parliament on the occasion of the Golden Jubilee of Independence in 1997. AFI called for "a vigorous national campaign be launched by all political parties to combat economically unsustainable growth of population, recognising that such growth lies at the root of most of our human, social and economic problems".

Unanimity was, however, conspicuous by its absence when it came passage of The Constitution (79th Amendment) Bill, 1992. It was introduced by P.V. Narasimha Rao Government in Rajya Sabha.

This pending bill has three objectives: 1) amend Directive Principles to commit State (central & state governments) to promote population control 2) to disqualify a Member of Parliament or State Legislature for having more than two children with prospective effect 3) amend fundamental duties to obligate citizens to embrace small-family norm.

These issues are obviously politically not important for Modi Government as compared to enacting a law against Triple Talaq.

It here apt to quote Biju Patnaik. As Chief Minister of Odisha, late Patnaik told National Development Council (NDC) that b "due importance had not been assigned to the programme of population control during the post-independence period".

As recorded in the minutes of NDC's 43rd meeting held during December 1991, Mr. Patnaik "called upon the Central Government to initiate action in this direction without bothering about electoral fortunes".

Connect AFI with 1 st five-year plan to see how citizens have acted as indifferent spectators to unsustainable population growth. The Plan (1951-56) stated: "The pressure of population in India is already so high that a reduction in the rate of growth must be regarded as a major desideratum. To some extent, improvement in living standards and more wide-spread education, especially among women, will themselves tend to lower the rate. But positive measures are also necessary for inculcation of the need and techniques of family planning (FP)".

The voluntary approach towards FP failed to rein in population explosion. This brought in compulsory sterilization during June 1975 – March 1977 when National Emergency was imposed.

The Janata Government did not wash its hands off from population control to sustain public resentment over Emergency excesses.

In his address to the nation from Red Fort on 15th August 1977, Prime Minister Morarji Desai thus made an important implicit observation on population control without referring to it. He pointed out that India progressed during 30 years after Independence but the fruits of progress did not reach 60 to 70 per cent of our population. They benefitted marginally.

Mr. Desai stated: "I do not like to find fault with anyone. We all are to be blamed. But we should learn from whatever had happened. If we do not ponder over it and continue to repeat the same mistakes, the very purpose of our freedom, which was to improve the lot of our countrymen and to invest Indian culture with a new dignity so that we could hold our head high in the world, might remain unfulfilled".

Janata Government's stance was pithily expounded by Education Minister Dr P.C. Chunder. Addressing a seminar on 25th February 1978, he stated: "Though the present Government was against any kind of compulsion, it did not minimise the need for family planning. As rapid growth of population was nullifying the development achievements, it was absolutely necessary to adopt the family welfare programme having population limit as an important component".

When Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980, Congress Party didn't shy away from population control. Her Government's resolve for country's long-term interest was pitched well by the President.

In his address to Parliament on 13th February 1982, President N.Sanjiva Reddy said: "The census of 1981 underlined anew the importance of population control. The Government gives high Priority to voluntary family planning as an essential ingredient of people's well-being and national progress and have included it as part of the revised 20-Point programme. It is our objective to bring down the birth rate to 21 and the death rate to 9 per thousand by the end of the century".

Even minority Governments showed courage to speak and act on demographic disaster. It is pertinent to recall what Prime Minister Chandrashekhar said at a 'Meet the Press' programme at Press Club, New Delhi. Answering a question, he stated: "I agree with you that population control is a must. If with the present speed we go on increasing the population, I think we will be in a serious trouble".

Take another case. Two PMs from minority, United Front Government, pressed PE alarm in their respective Independence Day speeches. HD Deve Gowda spoke on it on 15 th August 1996 and his successor I.K. Gujral on subsequent Independence day.

Mr. Gujral spoke at length. He said his Government would unveil a national population policy (NPP) and enact a law for the same. As he put it: "We have to try and control the growing population and there are very strong reasons for this. The biggest reason is poverty because poverty, illiteracy and low status of women lead to an increase in population".

They thus fared better than Modi Government, which got robust mandate from the public and yet overlooked India's number one enemy – Population bomb.

In fact, Lack of Political Will on PE dazzled during UPA regime. It banished term 'population control' from official communications to appease vocal human right activists. It refused to revive two-child family norm. It ruled out review of NPP 2000, which was unveiled by Vajpayee Government. It, however, retained NPP offshoot, National Commission on Population.

Modi Government did not hold any meeting of this Commission. Its website has disappeared.

In February 2018, Modi Cabinet decided to close Jansankhya Sthirata Kosh (JSK), an autonomous fund created in 2003 to finance means to create awareness about population stabilization strategies. JSK neither got regular funding from the Government nor from donors. The task of financing awareness about population control is now directly handled by the Ministry.

The Government also abolished family planning allowance in July 2017 on the recommendation of 7th Central Pay Commission. Charan Singh Government had introduced this allowance/incentive for Central Government employees in December 1979.

It is thus clear that Both UPA & NDA Government have given misgoverned population control. The population growth after 2000 could have easily been half of the present growth had NPP been implemented in letter and spirit.

Let such delving into past create a stepping stone for Mr. Modi's call into concrete action plan for management of demographic disaster.

Let citizens pray for Mr. Modi to draw strength and inspiration from his eternal guru, Babasaheb Ambedkar, chief architect of Indian Constitution and one of the greatest social reformers. As fourteenth and last child in his family, he had first-hand experience of PE.

It is here pertinent to cite a speech delivered on Mr. Ambedkar's behalf by P. J. Roham in Bombay Legislative Assembly on 10th November 1938. The speech is titled 'On Measures For Birth-Control'.

As put in the speech,"Very few have an adequate idea of the immense loss sustained by children born of persons who are handicapped either physically, mentally or financially. The parents as well as the society also suffer very much…."

Lack of political will has turned the Nation into a mass of suffering citizens after the Independence. The sufferings have multiplied due to laxity in controlling influx of persons from neighbouring countries.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: One point three billion steps

During the last decade and a half, growing population, especially the higher percentage of youths has been touted as a strength, rather than as a burden. Another problem was that the Family Planning programs of 1960s to 1980s worked only for the Hindus. In every census, the Muslim population not only grew, but the rate of growth also increased. UPA found it convenient to leave it at that.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.