News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST Going bananas

 

SEPTEMBER 03, 2019

By K Srinivasan

'THE PARK' serves Bananas at its Spa; if you read an advert like this in a Five Star Hotel, don't exclaim in haste WOW! and jump at it. Not just as yet.

You might be in for a real banana split, but Rs.442.50, split into Rs.375/- for two Bananas and Rs.67.50 GST on it @ 18%, as Rahul Bose was shell-shocked recently, when JW Marriott, charged that much for serving a platter of two Bananas.

Even as ANI tweeted "Investigation of hotel JW Marriott by Excise & Taxation Department of Chandigarh, for violation of Sec 11 of the GST Act (illegal collection of tax on an exempted item) in connection with actor RB's tweet over the price of two Bananas charged to him by the Hotel", the Chandigarh State GST Department was going full swing with the investigation of the matter.

On a nice Sunday, Bose had twittered, expressing an outcry at being charged such a huge amount for two Bananas by the Hotel.

In the Bill posted on the social media by him, the Bananas were shown as Fruit Platter. An amount of Rs.375/- was charged while the remaining Rs.67.50 out of Rs.442.50, booked to GST @ 18%, as applicable to hotel service.

In the meantime, reportedly the State GST Commissioner, Chandigarh, ordered an inquiry into the matter; officers visited the hotel and gathered the relevant information to put the Hotel on a Notice, which he did after completing a detailed inquiry.

An opportunity was given to the management to explain as to why they had charged tax on the tax-free fresh fruit (Bananas) ordered by the actor.

Not hearing from the Hotel, within the deadline of one day given to them to reply to the Show cause Notice/for a personal hearing before the authorities, based on the inquiry & available records, a penalty of Rs.25,000/- had been imposed on the Hotel for illegally charging tax on a tax-free fruit item.

It is interesting to follow the mixed reactions of people on a Delhi WhatsApp group, which stunningly comprise the whole gamut of law and practice and procedure, right and the wrongs and even possible solutions and lots and lots of laughter (LOL for short in WhatsApp parlance)

So, now restaurants will split Bananas that its exempt, gives free advises, one.

In fact, the Bars have been bi-furcating the Liquor bills served at Bars though coupled with Services, right after the introduction of GST, says another.

Yes, when the total tax incidence on imported liquor is as much as 58%, it is said, how will the State Government let go of its share of revenue, even if some complicated explanation of it says it is combined with services, called a composite supply and so forth.

The long and short of it is, Liquor is outside the scope of GST and the legislation on that is, writing on the wall, takes up a sympathiser of States, since taken a hit, under GST.

Their service is also exempt for exempt product then, asks one genuinely?

I don't understand how it's violation? Since principal supply is of services, so treating it as a composite supply and higher rate should be rightly applicable for the Bananas, quips another.

True. Not understanding this! Isn't restaurant a service? Why should we go for the product rate, when Law deems it as a service, escalates the matter, yet another.

Is there anyway a fine of 250000 can be imposed on the Excise & Taxation Department, sends one a straight snide!!

One zero is more in your message compared to the ANI report, corrects the third.

Purposefully; wrongly imposing penalty should invite penalty with a zero added, justifies the poser mischievously.

Once Schedule II deems it a service, there is no question of applying the rate of the food item.

Probably, they have done it because RB wanted free publicity, otherwise how many people know him, joins in a wise Lawyer with knowledge of law and the world, a worldly wise man, as they call.

Yet another, rushes to the rescue of the Hotel, IMO, hotel is right (in my opinion- the short form for IMO, incidentally) as we may have to study the terms of the hotel.

Whether it was part of room service or not? If not, it may be goods also, volunteers the rescuer with free legal aid.

The gear shits now from Bananas to liquor!!!

Serving Liquor as part of room service, now outside GST?? Questioningly one lights a bombshell!!

No!!! booms another with a quick bomb-like response and follows it up with fumes of liquor from his eyes and here is his explanation;

Liquor is still a State subject and excisable under State Excise enactments, did you not read the GST literature and heard the AIR's blaring all the time at introduction time of GST to allay the fears of the stakeholders!!

Supply of food with drinks will be deemed to be sale of goods, he concludes, emphatically.

What about the service element involved in serving of liquor Sir, asks one innocently?

Must be a sympathiser of the Centre or a neutral one like GST, I quite can't guess from the tenor of his question.

But, a legal expert instantly senses a threat to the State revenue and its enactments and clears all doubt with an Ivanisevic return service, to gain a break point.

Here comes the second part of his trilogy, having finished the first part to a round of applause, for that also deals with another form of fiction, perhaps to justify rightly the name of the literary form. Here he goes -

After the 46th Amendment, supply of food and drinks in a hotel or restaurant, whether by way of or as part of service, by a legal fiction is deemed as a sale of goods. All the State enactments provide this, he ends that rhetoric.

Article 366(29-A)(f) deems it as sale of goods, supplements a geek with the right legal alphabet, as if the confusion reaching already tipsy heights, is not enough.

He further sharply, connects it with the new GST Law, Para 6 (b) of Schedule II of the GST Act.

A Composite supply of goods consisting of services though, declared as deemed sale under the Constitution 366(29-A) to be precise, not-withstanding the service element in it.

You can't nibble into it for your share of revenue which is not there, despite the aspect theory, retorts the geek, by an idiomatic ending, likening it to barking up a wrong tree.

Finally, when the geek admits frankly, I am at a loss to understand all this, can anyone of you please fill up these gaps for me, the Lawyer comes to his rescue reassuringly, promising to come out with his epilogue of the final part of the trilogy, over the weekend.

To conclude, why should a new law enacted to save the economy and deliver it from all its perils of the past, turn into such a laughing stock; laughing comments from Bananas to eggs…you read it right.

A fortnight ago, there was another twitter user who complained that he was charged Rs.1700/- plus GST @18% for two boiled eggs at the Four Seasons Hotel in Mumbai.

Fortunately being outside the scope of GST, all of them fail to qualify as a taxable supply in the first place.

While bananas and eggs stand excluded under exempted supply, Liquor is straight away outside the Scope of GST and still remains an entry under List II (State List) to the Seventh Schedule of Article 246. When supplied with food, it is still covered as deemed sale under Article 366(29-A)(f), which still remains in the Statute book.

The practice followed generally by Bars attached to Hotels, is to levy liquor to state VAT by a separate bill either show it as outright sale or as a deemed sale per 46th Amendment Act, 1982.

Similarly, many Hotels do show exempted supplies such as Bananas or Eggs or other Fruits and vegetables or poultry or dairy produce such as Eggs or Milk or Butter etc., supplied in their natural form, which fail to fit into the definition of a taxable supply as '0' tax as they merit no tax.

It is to be shown as items of '0' tax in the itemised bill, if the Hotel chooses to raise even a consolidated Bill to the customers and that should do the trick and put an end to these kinds of controversies, once and for all, is the humble view of the Author.

Hope the Government comes out with an early advisory on these queer issues, before our GST vocabulary is populated with words like banana republic, Egg on your face and bar to bench and what not!

(Views of the author are personal. The author is a Senior Associate, RANK Associates, Chennai.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.