News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Reality of UT of Ladakh - from GST Perspective

NOVEMBER 19, 2019

By Akash Mittal, Advocate

THE Parliament of India has enacted the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 whereby on and from the appointed day, the State of Jammu and Kashmir has been reorganised into the Union territory ('UT') of Jammu and Kashmir and the UT of Ladakh. The said Act received the assent of the President on 09.08.2019 and later, 31.10.2019 was notified as the appointed day for the said change to become effective. The said Act was enacted to provide for reorganisation of the existing State of Jammu and Kashmir into the UT of Jammu and Kashmir and the UT of Ladakh.

Vide press release dated 20th September 2019, GST council had recommended suitable amendments to be brought in CGST Act, UTGST Act, and the corresponding SGST Acts in view of creation of UTs of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.

Recently, Ministry of Home Affairs has released the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 dated 30.10.2019. Amongst various other things, the said order states-

"AND WHEREAS, the Jammu and Kashmir State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has been made applicable to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh as specified in the Fifth Schedule to the principal Act. However, the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, being a Union Territory with Legislature shall have its own Goods and Services Tax, Act, 2017 whereas the Union Territory of Ladakh, being a Union Territory without Legislature shall be governed by the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017;

…..

NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 103 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the President, hereby makes the following Order, namely: -

….

(7) The Jammu and Kashmir Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall be applicable to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall be applicable to the Union Territory of Ladakh."

Therefore, it can be said that for an assessee carrying out its business in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir, the Jammu & Kashmir GST Act shall be applicable and for an assessee carrying out its business operations in Ladakh shall be covered by the UTGST Act.

Recently, vide Notification No. 51/2019-Central Tax dated 31.10.2019, the jurisdiction of Jammu Commissionerate over UT of J&K and UT of Ladakh has been notified.

Let us now analyse whether the existing legal provisions read with the machinery provisions and amendments notified as on date are sufficient to make GST practically effective in the UT of Ladakh.

It must be noted that the definition of "Union Territory" given under the CGST Act and the UTGST Act has not been amended yet to cover specifically within its ambit the UT of Ladakh. Section 1 of the UTGST Act, 2017 provides that it extends to the Union territories of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Chandigarh and other territory. Section 2(114) of the CGST Act and Section 2(8) of UTGST Act define Union territory as

'Union territory" means the territory of,--

(i) the Andaman and Nicobar Islands;

(ii) Lakshadweep;

(iii) Dadra and Nagar Haveli;

(iv) Daman and Diu;

(v) Chandigarh; or

( vi) other territory.

Explanation.-For the purposes of this Act, each of the territories specified in sub-clauses (i) to (vi) shall be considered to be a separate Union territory;"

The question that arises here is whether it can be said that UT of Ladakh will be covered within the phrase 'Other Territory'?

The UTGST Act does not define the said phrase 'Other Territory'. However, Section 2(10) of the UTGST Act provides that words and expressions used and not defined in UTGST Act but defined in CGST Act, IGST Act, the SGST Act, and GST Compensation to States Act, shall have the same meaning as assigned to them in those Acts. Section 2(81) of the CGST Act defines 'other territory' to include territories other than those comprising in a State and those referred to in sub-clause (a) to (e) of section 2(114) of CGST Act (or Section 2(8) of UTGST Act).

Therefore, a view may be taken that since UT of Ladakh is not covered under the jurisdiction of any State and any of the UT mentioned in sub-clause (a) to (e) of Section 2(114) of CGST Act (or Section 2(8) of UTGST Act), such area will be covered under the ambit of "Other Territory" and will be treated as UT for the purpose of GST.

However, there are various fundamental issues with respect to this new UT that have been apparently left unaddressed. Some of these issues have been listed hereunder-

- Whether taxable person supplying goods or services from UT of Ladakh needs to get registered under UTGST Act as 'other territory' or a migration facility will be made available to them? It must be noted that presently portal is not allowing for fresh registration under the category 'other territory'.

- What is the State code of this UT?

- In case the taxable person decides for transition to UTGST Act by applying for registration under "other territory", how will the input tax credit lying in the credit ledger be transferred from earlier registration under J&K SGST Act? Can the same be claimed suo moto by the taxpayers in GSTR 3B?

- Whether the earlier registration under J&K SSGT Act needs to be cancelled?

Therefore, as can be seen from above, though the Reorganization Act has been made effective, there is lack of clarity in respect of an assessee operating from the UT of Ladakh as well as assessee supplying goods or services to a recipient in Ladakh. There is a dire need of clarification/guidelines from the Government's end in view of the teething troubles emerging due to this reorganization. Proper notifications and circulars explaining the mechanism or approach to be adopted for Ladakh residents in respect of GST would be extremely helpful at this point.

(The author is Associate, Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan, New Delhi and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.