News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
Fake goods - Adequate provisions exist in IPC & Trade Marks Act, says Goyal

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 05, 2019: WHILE replying to a question in the Lok Sabha yesterday, the Commerce & Industry Minister, Mr Piyush Goyal, said that the primary responsibility for investigating the complaints of manufacturing and trading of counterfeit products rests with the concerned state police. Adequate provisions exist in the various laws for dealing with counterfeit products and those who are engaged in the business of pirated goods.

The Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides for penalty for applying false trade marks & trade descriptions and for selling goods to which a false trademark or trade descriptions is applied. It also contains provisions for falsifying or the false application of trademarks, false trade descriptions, etc. under sections 101,102,103,104 & 105 of the said Act. The remedies available under the act relate to the protection of the Intellectual Property Rights inherent in a trademark and provide both civil and criminal remedies for registered trademark owner. Action against piracy of product of registered brands, resulting in infringement of rights has to be taken in appropriate courts for securing civil and criminal remedies. The onus of initiating action against infringement of trademarks lies upon the owner of the registered trademark who can move the civil and criminal court for redressal.

Section 101-105 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 also provide for  penalty for falsifying and falsely applying trademarks. Offences under sections 103,104 & 105 are cognizable and the period of imprisonment provided is not less than six months with a maximum 3 years and with minimum fine of Rs. 50,000 which may extend to Rs.2,00,000. The court may also grant an injunction under Section 135 of the Trade Marks Act,1999 by which a person is required to perform or is restrained from performing a particular act like stopping the sale of counterfeit product or destroying them.

The India Penal Code, 1860 also contains provisions to deal with counterfeiting and piracy. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 can also be invoked by the consumer against the counterfeiters by filing complaints in the appropriate consumer court. The Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 also contains penalties those who use the standards (ISI) Mark without obtaining the requisite license. The bureau investigates and detects the case of misuse of the ISI Mark and prosecutes the offenders wherever required.
In the case of food and drugs, the offence is cognizable and police on complaint of anyone can take action against the offenders.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.