News Update

COVID-19: India tests more than 6 lakh in 24 hours for second day in a rowCBIC issues attachment order of three senior IRS officersPersistent lockdown further slows down Services PMI for July monthNoted singer S P Balasubrahmanyam tests positive for COVID-19Slump sale versus Transfer of going business and Merger under GSTInventory Write-off - Post-GST & Pre-GST (See 'THE INSIGHT' in fire in Beirut warehouse of flammable materials - Over 50 killed & 500 injuredGST Compensation - Gift, Statute, Trust?ST - No service tax payable under 'reverse charge mechanism' in respect of service charges paid to Rajasthan Police who are peforming statutory function of safeguarding currency chest: CESTATCus - 'GoPro HERO5 Black' Action Camera is classifiable under CTH 8525 8020 and entitled for benefit of duty exemption provided under 50/2017-Cus: CESTATFaceless Assessment - Over 58K cases selected to be disposed off by mid-September: CBDTST - Mining as a separate category of service liable to Service Tax was introduced only w.e.f. 01/06/2007, therefore, no demand prior to this date: CESTATCX - Buyers' premises can never be place of removal - Therefore, no CENVAT credit is admissible on outward transportation of goods even though sale of goods is on FOR destination basis: CESTATST - Activity of conducting Government transactions on behalf of RBI, carried out by assessee-bank, is of the nature of sovereign function performed on behalf of the Government & hence is not taxable: CESTATCOVID-19: Recovered cases now more than double of Active casesCus - Betel Nuts are not notified goods u/s 123 of Customs Act & so onus of proving foreign origin & smuggled nature of a particular consignment, rests with the Revenue - seizure of such goods is not tenable where proper documents are submitted by importer: CESTATOrder passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) is not sustainable where the officer who passed such order is not vested with jurisdiction over TDS matters: ITAT10,000 participants competed for 36 hours in 4th edition of Smart India HackathonTax and interest liability computed by AO on a different sheet of paper, will form part of the assessment order where the AO approves such computation immediately or some time later: ITATUnder PMGKAY-2, total 44.08 LMT food grains lifted by StatesProvision for costs on completed contracts based on identified & ascertained present liabilities, is allowed where based on technical assessments & projections of project managers, who are experts in their field: ITATDGFT allows export of all ventilators including breathing devicesCOVID-19: Global tally rises to 1.86 Crore & Death toll rises to 7 lakhDifficulty in activation of TAN & being informed about TDS liability only upon receiving demand notice, is sufficient plea to explain delay in filing returns: ITATRetailing of petro products - Govt eases guidelinesBihar Govt recommends CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput case
Cabinet okays funding of Delhi Metro's three Priority Corridors of Phase – IV

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 11, 2019: THE Union Cabinet has given its approval for revision in the funding pattern of three approved priority corridors of Delhi Metro Phase-IV projects, namely, (i) Aerocity to Tughlakabad, (ii) R.K Ashram to Janakpuri (West) and (iii) Mukundpur - Maujpur with sharing of land cost in the ratio of 50:50 between Government of India (GoI) and Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD).  This is in pursuance of the amendments to Metro Rail Policy, 2017 applicable only for Delhi, in compliance to the Supreme Court order dated 06.09.2019.

The total cost of the project which is Rs. 24,948.65 crore remains unchanged. The contribution from GoI increases from the existing Rs. 4,154.20 crore to Rs. 4,643.638 crore resulting in a net increase of Rs. 489.438 crore. The amount of external loan from bilateral/multilateral agencies which DMRC has to repay increases from the existing Rs. 11,462.60 crore to Rs.12,930.914 crore with a net increase of Rs. 1,468.314 crore.


Three priority corridors of Delhi Metro phase-IV project were approved by the Government of India in March, 2019 at a completion cost of Rs. 24,948.65 crore. The funding pattern was kept in line with provisions of Metro rail policy, 2017. GNCTD in April, 2019 directed DMRC not to start work on the sanctioned corridors unless MoHUA revises the cost sharing pattern in tune with approval concurred by them.

After intervention of the Supreme Court, the work was started in July, 2019. The Supreme Court in its order dated 06.09.2019, upheld the provisions of Metro Rail Policy, 2017 regarding bearing of operational losses and repayment of external loan and currency fluctuation cost by the State in case the Special Purpose Vehicle (DMRC in this case) fails. The Supreme Court directed to make a departure from the Policy to be applicable only in the case of Delhi and to share land cost in the ratio of 50:50 between GoI and GNCTD. The relevant para of Metro Rail Policy, 2017 is also amended accordingly.