News Update

When a similar activity is performed by a similarly placed entity in India who is acting to fulfil the same function for another Indian entity, same would normally be exigible to GST - To hold otherwise, in appellant's case would go against the grain of expressed intention of legislature: AAARNo material evidence is needed to substantiate retraction of statements recorded under coercion: ITATProvisions for doubtful debts must be deducted when computing a Trust's income available for application to charitable purposes: ITATNon-availability of PAN of deductee is not reasonable cause to explain delay in deducting TDS: ITATMandate u/s 68 is not fulfilled if assessee does not establish source of cash credits or genuineness & creditworthiness of depositors: ITATCX - Amendment carried out in Rule 6(6) of CCR by way of Notification No.50/2008-CX(NT) is retrospective - supplies made to SEZ developer are also to be considered as export: CESTATST - If transporters engaged are goods transport owners, not registered under service tax, there is no question of assessee availing credit on inputs - Conditions for availing abatement under Notfn No 32/04-ST are satisfied: CESTATCus - Appellant is not entitled to refund without having first challenged assessment order itself: CESTATCus - It was not open to Commr.(A) to revisit a decision taken in favour of appellant, save on appeal authorised by Commissioner of Customs: CESTATSynergy between seizure and confiscation under GSTInternational Customs Day - 20 officers & CHA to receive WCO Certificate of MeritRevision of Anti-dumping duty on imports of 'Sodium Nitrite' from PR China - Notfn. 40/2017-Customs(ADD) amendedWTO Chief hails support from many countries at DavosIndia, USA may settle trade spat over steel productsIncome tax raid on prominent hotel chain finds undisclosed foreign assets worth Rs 1000 CrIncome tax raids TN education institution; seizes cash of Rs 2 Cr + undisclosed income of Rs 532 Crore
 
Govt incurs huge subsidy burden for fertilizers: Gowda

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 14, 2019: UREA is being provided to the farmers at a statutorily notified Maximum Retail Price (MRP). The MRP of 45 kg bag of Urea is Rs. 242 per bag (exclusive of charges towards neam-coating and taxes as applicable) and the MRP of 50 kg bag of Urea is Rs. 268 per bag (exclusive of charges towards neam-coating and taxes as applicable). The difference between the delivered cost of Fertilizers at farm gate and net market realization by the urea units is given as subsidy to the Urea manufacturer/Importer by the Govt. of India. Accordingly, farmers are getting Urea at affordable MRP because of the subsidy provided by the Government.

As far as Phosphatic and Potassic fertilizers are concerned, the Government has implemented Nutrient Based Subsidy Policy w.e.f. 01.04.2010 for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers. Under the said policy, a fixed amount of subsidy decided on annual basis, is provided on each grade of subsidized P&K fertilizers depending on their Nutrient content. As the P&K fertilizers are decontrolled, the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) is fixed by Companies as per market dynamics at reasonable level. The MRP printed on each bag of these fertilizers, is inclusive of subsidy given by the Government of India. Accordingly, any farmer who is procuring these fertilizers at MRP is availing the benefit of subsidy.

This information was given in a written reply by the Union Minister of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Mr. D.V.Sadananda Gowda, in Rajya Sabha on Friday.


POST YOUR COMMENTS