News Update

Nexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Clearing the Air: Airtel's SC Decision provides clarity on test of AgencyGST implications for Corporate Debtor under IBCI-T- Petitioner's CIBIL score lowered due to same PAN being issued to another assessee who defaulted on loan; I-T Deptt to inform CIBIL of remedial measures taken: HCBrazil’s proposal to tax super-rich globally finds many takers in G20 GroupI-T- Additions framed on account of unconfirmed cash loans upheld in part, where assessee is unable to discharge onus of proving source of cash deposits : ITATCPM manifesto promising annihilation of all weapons of mass destructions including nuclear, draws flak from Defence MinisterI-T- Registration of trust u/s 12A denied due to inadvertent error by assessee in filing Form 10AB but with wrong selection code; case remanded for reconsideration: ITATBiden favours higher steel tariff on ‘cheating’ China + may up tariff on dominant solar tech suppliersI-T- Enhancement of income is not sustainable if CIT (A) not follow sec 251 and no notice given to assessee of enhancement : ITATUS Poll: Biden trumps Trump in money race by USD 75 mnI-T- Assessee is entitled for depreciation on goodwill arising out of difference between cost of acquisition and net value of assets and liabilities as per book value of CAPL : ITATNetanyahu says Israel to decide how and when to respond to Iran’s aggressionI-T- There is no scope of extrapolation in search assessment based solely on assumptions and surmises in absence of any tangible material qua the relevant assessment year: ITATGoogle slays costs by laying off staffers & shifting roles outside USI-T- Re-assessment cannot be sustained where based on borrowed satisfaction & where conducted in a mechanical manner: ITATHeavy downpours drown Dubai; Airport issues travel advisoryCus - There cannot be an exercise of jurisdiction to injunct invocation of BG, as it is a settled principle of law that bank guarantee constitutes an independent contract between the bank and the party in whose favour BG is furnished: HCHM pledges to make India completely Maoist-freeGST - Except for holding that the taxpayer had availed ITC which is blocked credit u/s 17(5), no reasons are specified - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCMicrosoft to inject USD 1.5 bn in AI Group G42 of UAEGST - Injustice would be caused unless petitioner is provided another opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Subject to deposit of 10% of demand, matter is remanded: HCCanadian budget proposes more taxes on higher income groups & tax credits for EVsGST - Petitioner has an appellate remedy against the impugned order - As petition was filed within the original period of limitation, it is just and appropriate that petitioner be permitted to present statutory appeal: HCWorld leaders appeal for quick ratification of UN Ocean TreatyGST - Once the notification itself has been declared as ultra vires, applying it would amount to applying an illegal notification: HCUK House debates ban on smokingGST - Transfer of development rights is amenable to GST and cannot be brought within the purview of Entry 5 of Schedule-III: HCGlobal economy to grow at 3.2% in current year and also 2025: IMFGST - Challenge to notification 11/2017-CTR clarifying the aspect of transfer of development rights being attracted to GST/TGST is devoid of merits: HCGreat Barrier Reef in Australia suffers serious bleachingGST - Conclusions were recorded in the assessment order without providing a personal hearing - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCUS to impose fresh sanctions on Iran’s missile programmeCus - Mere fact that Commissioner of Customs has filed an affidavit would not denude an officer, otherwise empowered under the Act/Rules to issue and adjudicate a SCN even though the officer may be below the rank of Commissioner: HCDelhi Police nabs woman for thieving luxury SUVsCus - As wife of appellant has already been penalized for the offence related to importation of BMW M5 Car, no reason found to impose penalty against appellant for same offence: CESTAT
 
Routers - Change in Customs Classification and Import Duty

 

JANUARY 01, 2020

By Akhilesh Kangsia, Joint Partner and Madhura Khandekar, Senior Associate, Lakshmi kumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys

TELECOM Industry has been facing numerous disputes on the customs front. One of such disputes is classification of 'Routers' under Customs Tariff and availability of exemption from payment of basic customs duty on importation. While Importers have been classifying 'routers' under Tariff Item 8517 69 30 as being specifically covered by name in the Customs Tariff, having 'Nil' rate of duty, the Customs department is of the view that 'routers' are specifically covered under Sub-heading 8517.62 (Tariff Item 8517 62 90) as "switching and routing apparatus" and on that basis, classifying the router under Tariff Item 8517 62 90. The controversy resulted in exemption from basic custom duty not being available to the router due to change in the classification.

This controversy, we must, attribute to the drafting error as Tariff Item 8517 69 30 for router was a misfit under Sub-Heading 8517.69. Rather, there should have been a Tariff Item for routers, under sub-heading 8517.62. In fact, routers are mentioned by name, under sub-Heading 8517.62, in other countries like, USA, Singapore, etc.

Probably realizing this, in Union Budget 2019-20, it was proposed to delete Tariff Item8517 69 30 from the Customs Tariff. The Finance Bill,though received the assent on 01.08.2019, this change (i.e., deletion of Tariff Item 8517 69 30 of router) was to be effective from a future date.

Vide Notification No. 89/2019-Cus.(NT) dated 10.12.19, the Central Government notified 01.01.2020 as the date for giving effect to this change. As a result of this, 'routers' shall be classifiable under sub-Heading 8517.62 (Tariff Item 8517 62 90) of Customs Tariff with effect from 01.01.2020.

Router being an IT product covered by Information Technology Agreement (ITA-I), it was expected a notification would be issued granting exemption from basic custom duty, to router, on account of change in classification within Heading. Accordingly, a notification has been issued now,being Notification No. 36/2019-Cus. , dated 30.12.19, amending parent Notification No.24/05-Cus.,by substituting Sr. No.13N.

The substituted entry reads as under:

Sr. No.
Heading, subheading or tariff item
Description
(1) (2) (3)
13N
8517 62 90
Routers

This amending notification continues the same rate of duty viz. exemption from the whole of the customs duty, for routers from 1.1.2020.

The Author(s)however feel that the above changes will not put to rest the controversy. The Customs department may still dispute classification of router under Sub-Heading 8517.62 to deny the above exemption though such stand might not be correct and legal. Ideally, a clarification should be issued or sought by the Trade and Industry from the Board that all and every type of router should get the exemption irrespective of the classification within Heading 85.17 or the Notification should be amended to indicate the Heading only, as 85.17.

End to the controversy should not remain a dream!

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.