News Update

China faces acute revenue crunch! Will it reform clunky fiscal system?Arunachal cops bust sex racket; 21 including govt employees arrestedI-T- Not providing cross-examination of maker of the statement on which AO relies upon to take adverse view against an assessee is a serious flaw which render the action of AO a nullity : ITATMajor road accidents: 8 killed in MP & 6 in OdishaI-T- 84-day delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) is condonable, where caused due to assessee's ill health; matter remanded for reconsideration: ITATNSSO reveals joblessness on decline in urban IndiaBharat Pavilion at Cannes Film Festival inauguratedAs protests turn violent, France declares state of emergency in CaledoniaI-T- Amount of enhancement is deemed to be income of previous year in which it is received for purposes of 'enhanced compensation' taxable as capital gain: ITATLawrence Wong assumes office as Singapore’s new PMDoT receives overwhelming response to its Sangam Initiative: 144 participants selectedPutin seeks greater support for war efforts in BeijingI-T- DDT liability is distinct and separate from the liability to pay income-tax on the total income of an assessee : ITATGST - SC tells UoI - Not necessary to make arrest in every caseFirst set of citizenship certificates after notification of CAA Rules, 2024 issuedAssassination attempt at Slovakia PM Fico; Serious injuries reportedCus - Without checking authenticity of certificate of origins, the same cannot be discarded & based on the same, benefit of exemption cannot be denied: CESTATFM says PM’s active monitoring behind infra sector turnaroundCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold and silver6 burnt to death as bus catches fire after ramming into lorry in APCX - Since the appellant has fulfilled procedural requirement as mentioned in Clause 2(a) of Notfn 33/99-CE , refund applications filed by appellant cannot be rejected: CESTAT
 
Pandemic care products - whether GST exemption is a better price bargain?

JUNE 19, 2020

By Asish Philip Abraham, Joint Partner & Darshan Machchhar, Principal Associate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys

THE spread of COVID-19 is one of the biggest crisis faced by the mankind. The emerging situation demands unique responses from the Government in supporting all the stakeholders involved in fighting the pandemic on war footing. For instance, to meet the immediate domestic demand for 'pandemic care products' (PPE, ventilators, test kits, masks), the Government exempted such products from basic customs duty and applicable cess for period up to 30.09.2020 1. In short term, BCD exemption might be detrimental to domestic manufacturing, however, the exemption on inputs will help the domestic industry to scale up for the immediate need.

There have been demands for GST exemption on pandemic care products from Public-spirited organisations, individuals and political parties. Owing to customs duty reduction, there was a further demand for exempting these goods from GST. This demand was on the basis that it would lead to reduction in prices of these goods for consumers. However, one must observe that these demands are based on misplaced understanding of GST, a tax based on value addition with deduction in the form of input tax credit for B2B transactions. The Government's primary apprehension that an exemption would add to the cost of manufacturing and not lead to substantial price reduction, while at the same time incentivising imports over domestic manufacturing appears to be correct. In this article, the author has attempted to analyse the demand for exemption, experience from the exemption provided to sanitary napkins, competitiveness of domestic manufacturers with that of imports, pitfalls and challenges of such demand.

GST exemption - how does it work?

GST is a value added tax collected on the value added by each supplier. This is done by charging GST on the supply made by a person and allowing deduction for input tax credit paid on procurement of goods and services by the said person. When a product is exempted from GST, it results in simultaneous denial of input tax credit, and a person is no longer entitled to claim input tax credit since he is not discharging any GST on his sale. This can be explained from the table below:

Particulars
GST on final product @ 12%
GST on final product exempt
GST on final product @ 5%
Cost charged by supplier of goods and services to manufacturer 80 80 80
GST on inputs and input services 8 (availed as ITC) 8 (no ITC) 8 (availed as ITC)
Cost of production and distribution 80 88 80
Sale price (after INR 20 margin) 100 108 100
GST on sale price 12 Nil 5
Price to customer 112 108 105*

*Refund of INR 3 (8 - 5) accumulated input tax credit should be provided by Government

From the above, it can be seen that exemption from GST does not result in reduction in prices to that extent. In fact, while the GST rate was reduced from 12% to Nil, the corresponding price reduction is only approximately 3.5%. This is primarily the result of manufacturer adding to his cost the GST charged by his suppliers which is no longer eligible as input tax credit to him.

Exemption - not the perfect solution

From the above discussion, it can be seen that the GST exemption would result in blocked input tax credit in the hands of manufacturer thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing and distribution. The resulting increase in the cost will overweigh and offset the GST rate reduction benefit. The companies will have additional compliance to maintain separate account of inputs, input services and capital goods used for manufacture of these items or reverse the input tax credit based on formulae prescribed.

Further, granting of exemption would result in distortion in tax structure, wherein import of these goods will become significantly advantageous and cost effective compared to manufacture of these goods in India. The imported goods will be zero rated and will not have any hidden tax cost, whereas the input tax credit will be embedded in the cost of products manufactured domestically, thereby reducing the competitiveness of domestic manufacturers.

Experience from GST exemption to sanitary napkins:

A similar situation had arisen at the time of introduction of GST, when sanitary napkins were placed in the 12% GST rate slab. While there was a significant demand for exempting sanitary napkins from GST, it was clarified vide press release dated 10.07.2017 that most of the raw materials required for manufacture of sanitary napkins attract higher GST rate and granting exemption will result in denial of input tax credit on procurement of these raw materials. This would place domestically manufactured sanitary napkins at a huge disadvantage vis-à-vis imports. The exemption from GST on supply of sanitary napkins in July 2018 resulted in increase in cost for manufacturers. Subsequently, anti-profiteering investigation on various entities conducted by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) has found that the exemption has resulted in negligible price reduction.

Observations and way forward:

As observed in the case of sanitary napkins, a complete exemption does not seem to be a suitable solution for achieving price reduction as the corresponding reduction in prices is not as much as the GST rate reduction from 12% to Nil appears to be. In that event, if the rate of GST on pandemic care products is sought to be reduced, it is suggested that the same should be reduced to 5%, from the current rate of 12% or more. This will help in achieving the objective of reducing prices by straight 7%, while at the same time maintaining the competitive effectiveness of domestic manufacturers vis-à-vis import of goods. It will not only protect the domestic industry but also help us in being self-reliant in times to come. Further, the concerns of accumulation in the hands of manufacturer need to be seriously delved into and a special solution should be drawn to grant full refund of credit accumulation in the hands of manufacturers in such tough times. A possible way to overcome this challenge of credit accumulation could be to expand the scope of refund of tax to tax paid on input services as well as tax paid on capital goods on a pro-rata basis, apart from refund of tax on inputs which is already being granted. This will help in reducing the financial costs on account of fund blockage and administrative cost of refunds.

In times to come, there will be more and more demand for reduction in rate of tax on certain products on a temporary basis. The need of the hour for the Government appears to be devising a fresh mechanism to deal with the challenge of accumulation of credit in achieving indirect price subsidization of the pandemic care products. If the refund mechanism is successfully devised, the Government may even consider an option of zero-rating the products, by not charging any GST on the product and at the same time providing refund of accumulated credit. This will help in addressing the twin challenges of demand for reducing the tax cost of the product while at the same time ensuring that the domestic industry does not suffer at the cost of imports.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

1Notification No. 20/2020-Customs dt. 09.04.2020 exempted basic customs duty and health cess on import of various goods like ventilators, face masks, surgical masks, Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), COVID-19 testing kits, and inputs imported for manufacture of these items. This exemption is made available up to September 2020

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.