News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Pandemic care products - whether GST exemption is a better price bargain?

JUNE 19, 2020

By Asish Philip Abraham, Joint Partner & Darshan Machchhar, Principal Associate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys

THE spread of COVID-19 is one of the biggest crisis faced by the mankind. The emerging situation demands unique responses from the Government in supporting all the stakeholders involved in fighting the pandemic on war footing. For instance, to meet the immediate domestic demand for 'pandemic care products' (PPE, ventilators, test kits, masks), the Government exempted such products from basic customs duty and applicable cess for period up to 30.09.2020 1. In short term, BCD exemption might be detrimental to domestic manufacturing, however, the exemption on inputs will help the domestic industry to scale up for the immediate need.

There have been demands for GST exemption on pandemic care products from Public-spirited organisations, individuals and political parties. Owing to customs duty reduction, there was a further demand for exempting these goods from GST. This demand was on the basis that it would lead to reduction in prices of these goods for consumers. However, one must observe that these demands are based on misplaced understanding of GST, a tax based on value addition with deduction in the form of input tax credit for B2B transactions. The Government's primary apprehension that an exemption would add to the cost of manufacturing and not lead to substantial price reduction, while at the same time incentivising imports over domestic manufacturing appears to be correct. In this article, the author has attempted to analyse the demand for exemption, experience from the exemption provided to sanitary napkins, competitiveness of domestic manufacturers with that of imports, pitfalls and challenges of such demand.

GST exemption - how does it work?

GST is a value added tax collected on the value added by each supplier. This is done by charging GST on the supply made by a person and allowing deduction for input tax credit paid on procurement of goods and services by the said person. When a product is exempted from GST, it results in simultaneous denial of input tax credit, and a person is no longer entitled to claim input tax credit since he is not discharging any GST on his sale. This can be explained from the table below:

Particulars
GST on final product @ 12%
GST on final product exempt
GST on final product @ 5%
Cost charged by supplier of goods and services to manufacturer 80 80 80
GST on inputs and input services 8 (availed as ITC) 8 (no ITC) 8 (availed as ITC)
Cost of production and distribution 80 88 80
Sale price (after INR 20 margin) 100 108 100
GST on sale price 12 Nil 5
Price to customer 112 108 105*

*Refund of INR 3 (8 - 5) accumulated input tax credit should be provided by Government

From the above, it can be seen that exemption from GST does not result in reduction in prices to that extent. In fact, while the GST rate was reduced from 12% to Nil, the corresponding price reduction is only approximately 3.5%. This is primarily the result of manufacturer adding to his cost the GST charged by his suppliers which is no longer eligible as input tax credit to him.

Exemption - not the perfect solution

From the above discussion, it can be seen that the GST exemption would result in blocked input tax credit in the hands of manufacturer thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing and distribution. The resulting increase in the cost will overweigh and offset the GST rate reduction benefit. The companies will have additional compliance to maintain separate account of inputs, input services and capital goods used for manufacture of these items or reverse the input tax credit based on formulae prescribed.

Further, granting of exemption would result in distortion in tax structure, wherein import of these goods will become significantly advantageous and cost effective compared to manufacture of these goods in India. The imported goods will be zero rated and will not have any hidden tax cost, whereas the input tax credit will be embedded in the cost of products manufactured domestically, thereby reducing the competitiveness of domestic manufacturers.

Experience from GST exemption to sanitary napkins:

A similar situation had arisen at the time of introduction of GST, when sanitary napkins were placed in the 12% GST rate slab. While there was a significant demand for exempting sanitary napkins from GST, it was clarified vide press release dated 10.07.2017 that most of the raw materials required for manufacture of sanitary napkins attract higher GST rate and granting exemption will result in denial of input tax credit on procurement of these raw materials. This would place domestically manufactured sanitary napkins at a huge disadvantage vis-à-vis imports. The exemption from GST on supply of sanitary napkins in July 2018 resulted in increase in cost for manufacturers. Subsequently, anti-profiteering investigation on various entities conducted by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) has found that the exemption has resulted in negligible price reduction.

Observations and way forward:

As observed in the case of sanitary napkins, a complete exemption does not seem to be a suitable solution for achieving price reduction as the corresponding reduction in prices is not as much as the GST rate reduction from 12% to Nil appears to be. In that event, if the rate of GST on pandemic care products is sought to be reduced, it is suggested that the same should be reduced to 5%, from the current rate of 12% or more. This will help in achieving the objective of reducing prices by straight 7%, while at the same time maintaining the competitive effectiveness of domestic manufacturers vis-à-vis import of goods. It will not only protect the domestic industry but also help us in being self-reliant in times to come. Further, the concerns of accumulation in the hands of manufacturer need to be seriously delved into and a special solution should be drawn to grant full refund of credit accumulation in the hands of manufacturers in such tough times. A possible way to overcome this challenge of credit accumulation could be to expand the scope of refund of tax to tax paid on input services as well as tax paid on capital goods on a pro-rata basis, apart from refund of tax on inputs which is already being granted. This will help in reducing the financial costs on account of fund blockage and administrative cost of refunds.

In times to come, there will be more and more demand for reduction in rate of tax on certain products on a temporary basis. The need of the hour for the Government appears to be devising a fresh mechanism to deal with the challenge of accumulation of credit in achieving indirect price subsidization of the pandemic care products. If the refund mechanism is successfully devised, the Government may even consider an option of zero-rating the products, by not charging any GST on the product and at the same time providing refund of accumulated credit. This will help in addressing the twin challenges of demand for reducing the tax cost of the product while at the same time ensuring that the domestic industry does not suffer at the cost of imports.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

1Notification No. 20/2020-Customs dt. 09.04.2020 exempted basic customs duty and health cess on import of various goods like ventilators, face masks, surgical masks, Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), COVID-19 testing kits, and inputs imported for manufacture of these items. This exemption is made available up to September 2020

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.