News Update

IndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsFiling of Form 10A & 10AB: CBDT extends due date to June 30RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesCPGRAMS recognized as best practice in Commonwealth Secretaries of public serviceIsrael-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?KABIL, CSIR ink MoU for Advancing Geophysical InvestigationsI-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsRight to Sleep - A Legal lullaby
 
GST Compensation - Gift, Statute, Trust?

AUGUST 05, 2020

By Vijay Kumar

Central Sales Tax (CST) Compensation

In his Budget Speech on 29.02.2008, the then Finance Minister Mr. Chidambaram stated,

Following an agreement between the Central Government and the State Governments, the rate of Central Sales Tax was reduced from 4 per cent to 3 per cent in this financial year. It is now proposed to reduce the rate to 2 per cent from April 1, 2008. Consultations are underway on the compensation for losses, if any, and once agreement is reached the new rate will be notified.

In his budget speech on 28.02.2013, (Mr. Chidambaram was still the Finance Minister), he said,

There is need for the Centre to compensate the States for loss due to the reduction in the CST rate. Hope inspires courage.

I propose to take the first decisive step by setting apart, in the Budget, a sum of Rs. 9,000 crore towards the first instalment of the balance of CST compensation. 

Obviously, he was not very keen to compensate the States.

On 07.08.2015, the Minister of State for Finance, Jayant Sinha informed Parliament,

The Empowered Committee had recommended to pay 100% CST compensation for year 2010-11, 75% CST compensation for 2011-12 and 50% CST compensation for 2012-13. Union Cabinet in its meeting held on 17.3.2015 had approved payment of CST compensation to the States for the financial years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 as per EC recommendation. Accordingly, Central Government (Department of Revenue) has released total Rs. 17,118.02 crore towards payment of CST compensation to the States/UT's for the year 2010-11.

CST compensation to the states/UT's for year 2011-12 is proposed to be paid in two installments in Financial Year 2015-16. CST compensation for the states for 2012-13 will be paid in 2016-17.

Provision of Rs. 15,028 crore has been made in BE 2015-16 for payment of CST compensation to the States/UT's for the year 2011-12.

Earlier on 10.12.2014, the then Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitley had told the Lok Sabha,

Let me Sir, with your permission, make the following statement so that it is quoted correctly: A major impediment in the implementation of the GST has been the trust deficit between the States and the Centre. One of the major reasons for this trust deficit is non-payment of the CST compensation to the States from 2010 onwards. In my meeting with the Empowered Committee of the State Finance Ministers on 3rd July, 2014, I had committed that partial payment of the outstanding CST compensation will be released this year. I stand by this commitment given by me. Despite difficult and challenging situation, I proposed to release about Rs.11,000 crore which is one-third this year as part payment of CST compensation to the States. This will take care of the amount from 2010-11 onwards; the balance amount I will start paying from the next financial year onwards when hopefully the situation would be better.

On the first anniversary of GST on 1 st July 2018, Mr Jaitley wrote

Firstly, the UPA Government lost the confidence of the States, including the Congress ruled States. In a move towards the single tax system, the UPA asked the States to abolish the CST. It promised the States that it would give them a compensation in lieu of the CST for a certain number of years. The States acted accordingly, abolished the CST and the Central Government owed the States several thousand crores as CST compensation. When the States demanded CST compensation, the Centre would look the other way. When I took over as the Finance Minister in May 2014, all the States, including the BJP ruled States, told me that they don't trust the Central Government because of what the UPA Government had done. They will discuss GST only if past CST compensation is paid. I conceded that the UPA let down of the States was unacceptable and in order to bridge the trust, despite pressures on the Central revenue, I will clear the arrears of the Central CST. I, accordingly, did that. The CST compensation was paid. The States were then willing to come to the table and move further on the GST.

Onto GST Compensation:

Section 18 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, stipulates,

18. Parliament shall, by law, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, provide for compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax for a period of five years .

Accordingly, Parliament passed the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, by which States are to be compensated if their revenue growth is not more than 14% compared to the base year 2015-16.

A compensation Cess is levied for the purposes of providing compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax, for a period of five years or for such period as may be prescribed on the recommendations of the Council.

Now, the problem comes. What happens if the Central Government runs out of money to pay the compensation to the States, as is the position today. The Office of Mr. Anurag Thakur, Minister of State, Finance tweeted,

Centre Released Rs. 1,65,302 Crore as GST Compensation to States/UTs for the FY 2019-20 against cess collection of Rs. 95,444 crore.

To release compensation for 2019-20, balance of cess amount collected during 2017-18 and 2018-19 was also utilised.

Centre also transferred Rs. 33,412 cr from CFI to Compensation Fund as part of an exercise to apportion balance of IGST pertaining to 2017-18.

So, now the position is that the Central Government does not have enough money to compensate the States as the Cess did not bring in sufficient revenue. What to do? Borrow, deny, discuss - several options are being floated. It is reported that the Finance Secretary has stated that the Centre cannot pay the compensation and the Attorney General has advised that the Centre is not legally bound to pay.

Kerala Finance Minister Mr. Thomas Isaac tweeted,

According to news reports the hearing before Standing Committee on Finance, Centre has taken the stand that GST Compensation can't be paid and present arrangements be revised by Council. Such a brazen betrayal of federal trust! Convene the Council meeting immediately as promised.

AG opinion seems to be that if there is no money in Cess Fund it's is upto GST Council to make appropriate arrangements. Fine. But Centre has 1/3rd votes in Council. No decision can be taken without its concurrence. So, the question is, what is its stance? To pay or not to pay?

It is reported that Punjab Finance Minister Manpreet Singh has written to Union Finance Minister,

The recent reports in the national media that Central Government has informed the Parliamentary panel that it has neither the money nor the obligation to pay GST compensation to States has come as a complete shock to Punjab. Punjab is already operating with a deficit in excess of 45%, the highest among the general category states. With the current pace, this is likely to exceed 60% by the time period of assured compensation is over.

Gift, Statute or Trust

Now, we have a real crisis. Neither the Constitution, nor the Compensation Act, visualised a situation when the government at the Centre has no money to pay the compensation and the States can merrily enjoy an assured 14% increase in their GST kitty with or without actual collections. It is reported that the matter is to be discussed in the GST Council meeting. What is there to discuss? The Constitution and the Act require the centre to pay the compensation. To go back on the constitutional guarantee, will be a big blow to co-operative federalism.

Mr. Chidambaram did not pay the CST Compensation, which Mr. Arun Jaitley paid only to create a new compensation, which his successors are not able to pay. Mr. Jaitley said that a major impediment in the implementation of the GST has been the trust deficit between the States and the Centre. Should we wait for another impediment for the GST compensation to be paid?

From a former Chairman, CBIC .

Mr. Najib Shah was the CBIC Chairman just before GST was launched and was so, closely associated with its creation. In our recent webinar on "three Years of GST", he said that,

- the 14% that they accepted (at gun point) was a huge burden

- Introducing a cess was not a great idea.

- If the Cess collected is not sufficient, the Centre has a serious problem.

https://youtube-cutter.org/video/HY8eU21n2

Until next week


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Guarantee- What's that

Our constitution had guaranteed the erstwhile Princes and privy purse would be paid to them. But, in 1970, Mrs.Indira Gandhi abolished it for saving paltry sum of Rs.4 crores. So, there is already successful precedent for breaching the Constitutional guarantees. Now, States cannot walk out of GST! Can they?

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.