News Update

CBIC reduces BCD on Lentils (Masoor) for period between Sept18-Oct 31, 2020CBIC gives effect to new Section 28DA of Customs ActOver 5000 cases disposed of since partial lifting of lockdown: ITATGovt extends validity of ceiling prices of Knee Implants till Sept, 2021ESIC invites submission of claims for unemployment benefitImport Policy amended for random sampling of LED productsAll Opposition parties minus Congress protest against GST Compensation issueGST Compensation Row Should Aid Enactment of Govt Debt LawHarsimrat Kaur protests against farm bills; puts in papersAnti-Profiteering under GST - An analysis of the nature and structure of NAACus - Non-implementation of appellate order strikes at the very root of administrative discipline - result will be undue harassment to assessees and chaos in administration of tax laws: HCCus - Even if any prayer is made, that cannot be a ground to compel the owner from accepting provisional release of goods with conditions despite there being an appellate order in his favour: HCCX - Principal manufacturer is not liable to pay duty on waste & scrap generated by job worker in course of processing of goods sent by the former: CESTATCX - Refunds processed under Notfn 32/99 are also covered u/s 11B of CEA & upon attaining finality, parallel proceedings for recovery of alleged erroneous refund u/s 11A are not maintainable: CESTATST - Appellants have rightly discharged service tax as recipient of service in terms of 2nd proviso to Rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules - Condition No. 3(f)(ii) of 40/2012-ST cannot be misconstrued to deny refund: CESTATST - Refund - Rule 5 of CCR - While arriving at the value of total turnover, there is no requirement to include the amount of export invoices for which payment has not been received: CESTATRegistration u/s 12AA cannot be denied to a trust even if its charitable activities have not yet commenced: ITATCIT(A) is obligated to decide an appeal on merits & cannot dismiss appeal for non-prosecution: ITATIf an amount is offered to tax as income in suceeding AY, additions need not be framed in respect of such income, during the current AY: ITATFraming of any additions to assessee's income is per se insufficient grounds to impose penalty, where no concealment of income or funishing of inaccurate particulars is attributable: ITATAdditions framed for unexplained cash credits are sustainable if assessee gave no justification for shares being subscribed at high premium, despite having a very nominal income: ITATCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates for export & import purposesCOVID-19: Global tally goes past 3 Crore with 9.47 lakh deaths, including over 2 lakhs in USA; 1.35 lakh in Brazil & 84K in IndiaIncome Tax raids hotelier at many places in Jammu & KashmirGovt re-activates micro-industrialization process in Rural IndiaGST - Breezily e-invoicing amidst COVID-19 - Voicing concerns crawling lately!Provisional release of seized goods - A comparison under CGST Act, 2017 & CA, 1962 (See 'The Insight' in Taxongo.com)No single transfer policy for all govt employees: MoSCriminal Law Reform Committee collecting suggestions from all quartersNCAP to achieve about 30% dip in Particulate Matter Concentrations by 2024Special Pax Trains score 82% average occupancy: GoyalRights of power consumer - Govt invites inputs to Draft RulesAmerica goes Japanese way; likely to offer tax breaks and subsidies to companies for shifting factories from ChinaLaw on extension of Compensation Cess and other ground realities
 
Faceless Assessment - Over 58K cases selected to be disposed off by mid-September: CBDT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 05, 2020: ABOUT 3,130 tax personnel, including 600 IT officers are busy implementing the Faceless e-Assessment scheme of Income Tax. Out of 58,319 cases selected for faceless assessment, already 8,700 cases have been disposed off.

"This is the first time that we are doing the faceless e-assessment. The work has picked up since July, after having addressed all the issues related to infrastructure, manpower, hardware and software.  Our target is to finish all the cases by mid-September," said Mr S K Gupta, Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Member, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). 

The Income Tax Department in October 2019 rolled out the faceless e-assessment scheme that eliminates physical interface between an assessing officer and an assessee.  Eight cities - Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad and Pune are covered under the scheme.  Mr Gupta said that the cases taken up for faceless e-assessment include a mix of returns filed by individuals, businesses, MSME as well as big companies.

How the faceless e-assessment works?

The National e-Assessment Centre in Delhi is the single point of contact for the taxpayer as well as for all units conducting assessment.  It is the NEC which issues notices under Section 143(2) to the assesse for which the assessee is required to respond within 15 days of receipt of notice.  Upon the issue of a notice, NEC allocates the case to any Assessment Unit through an automated allocation system, ensuring anonymity.

The conventional system of scrutiny assessment involved a high level of personal interaction between the tax payer and the Income Tax Department officials. Under the faceless e-assessment system, the tax payer would not know by whom his /her return is being assessed or in which city.  "The anonymity and the absence of human interface will go a long way in addressing the issue of harassment as well as curb instances of corruption" Mr Gupta added. "Instead of territorial jurisdiction, we have brought it dynamic jurisdiction" he added.


POST YOUR COMMENTS