News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Slump sale versus Transfer of going business and Merger under GST

AUGUST 05 , 2020

By K Srinivasan

BUSINESS restructuring is a comprehensive process, be it financial or technological or market or organizational. Business can be re-arranged by way of mergers, demergers, disinvestments, takeovers, strategic alliance or slump sale.

But transfer of a going concern is quite different from the above, in the sense that it has its independent existence even after its transfer and it needs to be functional and not defunct but really a going concern, regardless of whether it is profit making or not, to fit the above description.

Concept of Slump Sale

The concept of slump sale originates from the Income Tax Act, 1961. The IT Act, in section 2(42C) defines slump sale as the transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of the sale for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to the individual assets and liabilities in such sales.

Further as per explanation 1 to section 2(19AA),  undertaking here shall include any part of an undertaking or a business activity taken as whole, but does not include individual assets or liabilities or any combination thereof not constituting a business activity.

Therefore, slump sale implies:

1. Sale of one or more undertakings

2. No individual value should be assigned to assets and liabilities, and the same to be sold for a lump sum consideration, and

3. All assets and liabilities of the undertaking must be transferred.

A major precondition of a slump sale is that all assets and liabilities of the business undertaking must be transferred together, to the buyer.

While doing so, he immovable part namely Land and buildings or Plant, would be rightly excludible from the scope of Supply, and the consideration for the same will not enter the valuation as per Explanation to Sec 17(3) of the Act, in view of Para 5 of Schedule III, treating it as neither a good nor a service.

As per Section 50B of IT Act, the cost of acquisition of such sale shall be the net worth (book value of assets and liabilities) of the undertaking.

Explanation 1 provides the method of computing the net worth of an undertaking or a division sold on slump sale basis. As per Explanation  1 - For the purposes of this section, net worth shall be the aggregate value of total assets of the undertaking or division as reduced by the value of liabilities of such undertaking or division as appearing in its books of account.

There are various judicial pronouncements where there is difference of opinion that it is not essential to transfer all assets and liabilities for a transaction to qualify for a slump sale.

That even if some assets are retained by the transferor and the undertaking after such transfer carries out its business activities without any obstruction, it shall still qualify to be a slump sale.

Since all assets and liabilities are to be transferred in a slump sale, it is important for one to understand the concept of going concern to distinguish one from another.

Concept of Going Concern

The terminology, going concern is not precisely mentioned in the definition of slump sale. Transfer as a going concern means transfer of a business or a unit which is capable of being carried on by a purchaser as an independent business.

To constitute a slump sale, it is not necessary that the business should be ongoing at the time of its transfer.

An enterprise is normally viewed as a going concern, that is, as continuing in operation for the foreseeable future. It is assumed that the enterprise has neither the intention nor the necessity of liquidation nor of curtailing materially the scale of the operations.

To constitute a slump sale, all the assets and liabilities of the undertaking need to be transferred. Therefore, it can be said that companies whose operations are shut; is into liquidation may also opt for slump sale provided the conditions mentioned above are met.

The intention of such condition is to ensure that the business will continue in the new hands with regularity and a sense of permanence.

Further, it is not necessary that the entity should be a profit making company. The only valid point to be considered for a transfer to constitute as a going concern is, to mean if it constitutes a business activity capable of being run independently into a foreseeable future.

The term going concern, finds no mention except in Para 4(c)(i) of Schedule II to the GST Act, where it implies negatively that it is a supply of service by excluding it from the scope of supply of goods.

However, one can also refer to the pronouncement of the Advance Authority Ruling in case of Rajashri Foods Pvt. Ltd - 2018-TIOL-36-AAR-GST for the same as mentioned below:

1. A going concern is a concept of accounting and applies to the business of the company as a whole.

2. Transfer of a going concern means transfer of a running business which is capable of being carried on by the purchaser as an independent business

3. Such transfer of business as a whole will comprise comprehensive transfer of immovable property, goods and transfer of unexecuted orders, employees, goodwill etc.

Transfer of business assets as referred to in Para 1 of Schedule I to the CGST Act implies, where part of the assets are transferred and not the whole business, i.e. the liabilities remain in the books of the transferor, whereas in transfer of business, all assets and liabilities are transferred together, then the ITC availed on the same would require reversal of the same. [N. N o. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 vide Serial No. 2 read with Sec 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 & Rule 42 of the CGST Rules, 2017 refers]

The concept of transfer of going concern comes in to play when the business as a whole is transferred with all its assets and liabilities and in which case the ITC availed also gets to be transferred to the buyer.

However, case laws and analysis do point at the likelihood of transfer of assets alone to also mean transfer of a business as a going concern.

Therefore, it is not known conclusively whether transfer of going business mandates transfer of not only assets but also liabilities together with such transfer of business as a going concern.

Merger

In terms of Section 18(3) of the GST Act, if there is a change in the constitution of a registered person on account of sale, merger, demerger, amalgamation, lease or transfer of the business with the specific provisions for transfer of liabilities, the said registered person shall be allowed to transfer the input tax credit.

ITC remaining un-utilized in his electronic credit ledger can be transmitted to such sold, merged, demerged, amalgamated, leased or transferred business in the manner prescribed in the  GST Rules, 2017 by declaring the same, electronically, on the common portal in Form GST ITC-02.

Rule 41(2) of the CGST Rules provides that the transferor shall also submit a copy of a certificate issued by a practicing chartered accountant or cost accountant certifying that the sale, merger, de-merger, amalgamation, lease or transfer of business has been done with a specific provision for the transfer of liabilities.

[The Author is a former Assistant Commissioner of GST, Chennai and a CBIC Master Trainer, GST and currently a Senior Associate, Indirect & Corporate Taxes, at a Chennai-based Law Firm, RANK Associates. The views of the Author are purely personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.