News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST Data safe with GSTN - don't worry, there's a solution

AUGUST 12, 2020

By Vijay Kumar

GST Data safe with GSTN

THE first day of August 2020 brought in tremendous tension for taxpayers and tax consultants. On that fateful day, they found that the July 2017 return was missing from the GST Portal. Worried taxpayers and consultants ran helter-skelter trying to view or download the missing mysterious return. Nobody had an answer or knew the way.

Social media fired up with frustrated messages.

One of the first messages read, "July 17 return data has been removed from the GST portal; not able to view or download any return related data for the month of July 17."

A Government sympathiser commented, "How will the system work in case data is kept on adding without any limit? Some old data has to go to the history." But will history be on record somewhere?

Another observed, "It will progressively disappear I guess month-wise". What is progressive in disappearance?

"But Sir, GSTN should inform this to public", said the frustrated taxpayer. Why? Asked another. Since, when did you start believing that they are responsible?

Another concerned citizen observed, "All returns are filed by the taxpayers and they should be having them with them." What if I lose them? Lost forever?

The bright spot as observed by an expert was that we should be happy that the data is not available for Government officers also.

What happened? Was the data lost? Is it kept in safe custody somewhere? Why is it not accessible to the taxpayers who filed them? Will the data be available only for three years? Is GSTN mandated/obliged/required/expected to keep the data alive; if so, for how many years? Are they capable of protecting and providing data?

The GSTN reacted on August 3rd with a tweet,

Dear Taxpayer, the team is working to restore the facility to file and view GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 return for July, 2017. We expect it to be available in a day.

So, apparently, the data is safe.

And they rectified the damage. On 6th August GSTN tweeted,

Dear Taxpayers, the facility to view, file and download returns of period July 2017 has been restored on GST portal

Great work - all the agitation was for nothing.

Immediately, somebody tweeted

But still there is no option of JULY 2017 in the drop down list while selecting month for refund application and portal does not allow to proceed further without filing refund application for July 2017-18

And GSTN responded immediately,

Dear Sir, sorry for the inconvenience caused. Our tech team is working on this and it will be implemented in due course.

So, now there is another problem and they will surely find a solution to it as soon as possible.

Why is it that data is playing truant in the portal? It might be a technical snag or lack of storage or both. In any case, you are the loser. In one of our webinars, a former CBIC Chairman stated, "technology failed us". It indeed did. Failure of technology is not uncommon, but frequent and consistent failure is disastrous, more so when they make the taxpayer responsible for all their mistakes.

A video regarding another problem by GSTN (what I mean is video is by GSTN, not problem is by GSTN) states:

Yes, don't worry; there's a solution - which will come in due course.

In the meantime, you are advised to take copies of all your data from the portal by any/all means possible - download, screenshots, pdf, jpg, print with dates clearly marked, each in triplicate stored in different places. Don't worry about cost or time - they will be useful in the inevitable litigation that you will face in future. And don't let the Department know that you have the copies; they will summon you and ask you to produce these copies - failure to do so will be deemed as evidence to evade and not co-operating with investigation.

Maybe the big taxpayers, the corporate giants, can do all these and more, but what about the small players in this game? They are meant to suffer and be at the wrong end of the might of the State.

But don't worry; there's a solution - GSTN knows. God Should Take Notice

Until next week


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.