News Update

GST - Profiteering - While the petitioner wants to pay, the State CWFs are neither operational nor functional - Strange : HCJoe Biden promises Commission to recommend changes to Supreme CourtGST - Anti-Profiteering - Directions of NAA to undertake further investigation with regard to other projects, notice and summons issued by respondent stayed: HCBihar Polls - BJP manifesto promises 19 lakh jobs + free-vaccination for COVID-19 + lentils under MSPCus - Notification prohibiting export was uploaded digitally on 14.09.2020 at 22:28:11 hours - Export of onions in respect of shipping bills which were presented and generated prior to this date/time shall be allowed: HCBihar CM Sushil Modi tests positive for CoronavirusCus - When the Court is in session of a matter, an administrative or executive authority cannot start parallel proceeding on very same subject matter at its own ipse dixit and record finding: HCSutherland 'take two' and the Transition of Cess (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Govt to go for graded relaxation in visa and travel restrictionsTax Returns & Politicians - They necessarily make quaint & strange bedfellows!Amendment to Rule 142(1A) is anti-taxpayerCBIC grants Customs & Excise duty exemption to goods imported against duty credit scrip under RoSLVAT - Orders directing recovery of duty from an assessee are unsustainable, where they are non speaking orders & contravene the principles of natural justice: HCCus - CBLR - It is established principle of law that mere facilitation without knowledge of consequences, would not amount to abetting an offence: CESTATIFSCA prescribes regulatory framework for REITs and InvITs in IFSCCX - Only for reason that M/s Vedanta paid duty amount much prior to issue of SCN & without contesting went for settlement, no adverse inference can be drawn so as to deny CENVAT availed by their consignee on supplementary invoices: CESTATGlobal trade to shrink by 9%, says UNCTADST - Insurance service provided to banks by Deposit Insurance Corporation, qualifies as input service - CENVAT credit can be availed of service tax paid by banks for such service provided to them in course of rendering output services: CESTATPM to meet global fund houses to woo FDI inflowsCus - SCN has tripped upon itself in its haste to carry the impugned goods beyond the scope of eligibility of the exemption notification: CESTATSearch assessment order passed u/s 153A is unsustainable where no material incriminating the assessee is found in course of search proceedings: ITATMaharashtra Govt revokes standing approval granted to CBI to enter State for probesClub expenses incurred by assessee cannot be allowed as business expenses, where they are found to have been incurred for personal use: ITATECI sets up panel to examine issues concerning expenditure limitsProviso to section 36(1)(iii) mandates capitalization of interest only in respect of capital assets purchased out of borrowed funds: ITATLimitation period of six months for deciding the application for registartion u/s 12AA is applicable to remanded matters: ITATIncome tax raids two govt contractors; detects bogus claimsPure consultancy services (without supply of goods) provided to private individuals is taxable @18%: AARProliferate Litigation as much as you can
 
Unfair contracts now defined in Consumer Protection Act: MoS

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 21, 2020: THE Indian Contract Act, 1872 determines obligations of the parties to perform or offer to perform respective promises unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Act, or of any other law.

As informed by the Law Commission of India, in order to protect the consumers, the Law Commission in its Report No.199 titled ‘Unfair (Procedural and Substantive) Terms in Contracts' recommended that the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 need not be disturbed.

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 has come into force w.e.f. 20 th July, 2020 and has replaced the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. As provided in the new  Act unfair contract means a contract  between a manufacturer or trader or service provider on one hand and a consumer on the other, having such terms which cause significant change in the rights of such consumer, including the following, namely:-

(i) requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of   contractual obligations; or

(ii) imposing any penalty on the consumer, for the breach of contract thereof which is wholly

disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract; or

(iii) refusing to accept early repayment of debts on payment of applicable penalty; or

(iv) entitling a party to the contract to terminate such contract unilaterally, without reasonable cause; or

(v) permitting or has the effect of permitting one party to assign the contract to the detriment of the other party who is a consumer, without his consent; or

(vi) imposing on the consumer any unreasonable charge, obligation or condition which puts such consumer to disadvantage;

This information was given in a written reply by the Union Minister of State for Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution, Mr Danve Raosaheb Dadarao in Lok Sabha yesterday.


POST YOUR COMMENTS