News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Henna powder - classification under GST regime

OCTOBER 20, 2020

By Narendra Singhvi, Joint Partner & Priyamvada Joshi, Consultant, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Jaipur

THE controversy around classification of Henna products has been doing the rounds for quite some time. In the context of Henna powder, the issue of its classification under Chapter 14 as a 'vegetable product' or under Chapter 33 as a 'Preparation for use on hair' prevailed during the pre-GST regime. Though settled by various decisions in the pre-GST regime, the controversy has gained a fresh lease of life with the department raising the same dispute in the GST regime now. Amendments in the rate notifications and a recent ruling of the Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan have added to the pain of the assessees.

An application for advance ruling was filed before the Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan in M/s. Sunil Kumar Gehlot, - 2020-TIOL-120-AAR-GST, seeking the ruling on classification of Henna powder for purposes of GST. The Applicant was of the view that it is covered under Heading 1404 attracting GST @ 5%, based on the following grounds:

a) While filing application for registration under GST laws, the list of goods covered under Chapter 14 included Henna powder.

b) The fact of applicable rate of GST on Henna powder as 5% is clear from the inception of GST, as confirmed vide Agenda Item No. 10 of the issues recommended by the Fitment Committee for the consideration of GST Council.

In its comments, the jurisdictional officer commented that artificial henna and henna products, being cosmetic items, are classifiable under Heading 3305 and attract GST @ 18%.

In this background, the Authority ruled that Henna powder is classifiable under Entry No. 59 of Schedule III of the rate notification as a 'Preparation for use on the hair' falling under Chapter 33 and attracts GST @ 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST), on basis of the following findings:

a) The tariff items 1404 1011 to 1404 1090, which specifically referred to Henna powder, of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (CTA) have been omitted therefrom vide the Finance Act, 2006 and thus, Henna powder cannot be classified under Chapter 14.

b) Henna powder has a natural property of dye/tanning and is generally used as a hair dye, thus covered as a 'Preparation for use on hair'.

Though technically in terms of Section 103(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, the ruling is binding only on the Applicant and his jurisdictional officer, the ruling is being made use of by the field formations to entertain the view that Henna powder is liable to GST @ 18%.

The classification of any product has to be based on the characteristics of the product under question. In the context of Henna powder, the issue of classification had already come for consideration of courts in the pre-GST regime, where characteristics of the product and the form, in which it is sold, were considered for resolving the disputes. Henna powder has variety of forms and uses, and the same must form basis of its classification. This aspect seems to have been ignored in the aforesaid application, comments from the jurisdictional officer as well as the ruling.

The uncertainty created on classification of Henna powder in the GST regime is, thus, far from being answered and is likely to witness litigation.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.