News Update

Karnataka elections to be held on May 10; Results to be declared on May 13: CECKarnataka Elections: 5.24 Crore voters to participateNCLT rules Google to pay Rs 1337 Cr fine within 30 daysMoving from ODF to Garbage Free Cities under SBM-U 2.0: PuriBJP MP Girish Bapat passes away; PM offers condolencesLawyers cannot become Members of the GST Appellate TribunalI-T - CBDT Circular No. 6 of 2016 on recharacterization of gains on transfer of listed shares/securities and subsequent clarification, is retrospective in operation: HCIf PAN not linked to Aadhaar, CBDT notifies rules to deny refund, interest on refund and higher TDS rateI-T - Principles of natural justice are contravened where assessment u/s 153 r/w Section 144 is done by AO without giving assessee an opportunity of personal hearing : HCIndia's overall exports cross USD 750 bn mark: GoyalI-T - No disallowance of interest can be made when interest-bearing funds exceed the investments made by assessee in securities yielding exempt income : ITATYadav launches e-passbook for EPFO members, inaugurates creche facilityI-T - Re-assessment invalid where commenced by AO without considering the supporting documents adduced by assessee to explain sources of income : ITATTDS from transfer of Virtual digital assets aggregates to Rs 158 Cr upto Mar 20: MoSI-T - Penalty u/s 271B need not be imposed where book results shown by assessee were substantially accepted by Revenue as genuine & delay in audit of accounts was duly explained: ITATCentral Bureau of Narcotics busts Drug syndicate in DelhiI-T - To impose or not to impose penalty is at the discretion of the authority to be exercised judicially & on considering all relevant circumstances ; AO can drop penalty for bona fide or technical breach of provisions: ITATG20 Meeting: Paperless trade is fixed as new targetST - Tax liability does not arise by way of being Commission Agent on whose behalf he collects the toll as per section 65(19) of Finance Act, 1994 for the period prior to introduction of negative list regime: CESTATCBIC notifies Mopa for loading & unloading of cargoCus - Merely because some parts were imported separately and cleared under a separate Bill of Entry, department cannot contend that goods cannot be classified under CTH 8437: CESTATCBIC issues Draft Circular to launch exchange rate automation moduleGoldman Sachs study says AI may impact 300 mn jobsFrance raids banks in tax fraud casesCanada offers tax credits to shore up critical minerals extractionApple launches ‘buy now, pay later’ service in AmericaRussians flood Dubai; Rental shoots upGreece nabs two Pakistanis for terror attack against jewsChinese officials paid USD 40 mn bribe to unfreeze FTX crypto assets2000 Swiss women move ECHR on how climate change impacting human rights
 
Taxing the untaxed - Slump Exchange

FEBRUARY 08, 2021

By Mitesh Jain, Partner, ELP

Introduction

BUDGET 2021 was well received amongst the business fraternity with its focus on growth and fiscal expansion while simultaneously maintain the headline tax rates. While tax rates have not been tinkered with, measures have been taken to rationalize tax leakage / plug the loopholes. One such measure is widening of the definition of slump sale to cover all types of transfer of business undertaking.

Taxation of transfer of business undertaking - A long drawn litigation path

Sale of business undertaking on a going concern basis is one of the widely used modes of business reorganization as it can be quickly implemented and does not have to go through Court/ NCLT approval process.

Taxation of sale of such business undertaking has always been a contagious issue wherein the Supreme Court ('SC') while dealing with slump sale in the case of CIT v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. - 2002-TIOL-766-SC-IT-LB had held that in the absence of a specific provision in the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('IT Act') to tax sale of a business undertaking, the sale is not liable to income-tax.

The above anomaly was filled by Finance Act, 1999 inserting the provisions for explicitly taxing sale of a business undertaking. The definition of slump sale read as transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of the sale for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to the individual assets and liabilities in such sales.

Current taxation issue

During the recent years, transfer of business undertakings started taking place through various alternative mechanisms such as issue of shares or other securities for acquisition of an undertaking instead of cash consideration. Such transfers essentially are considered as 'exchange' and hence, were popularly referred to as slump exchange.

Various Courts dealt with the issue of taxation of slump exchange / transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration / consideration in kind or no consideration over the years. In M/s. Areva T&D India Ltd vs. DCIT (ITA No.561/Mds/2011), Madras High Court ('HC') held that where there is no monetary consideration involved in the transaction, the transaction ought not to be brought within the definition of the term slump sale as defined under the IT Act.

Bombay HC in CIT v. Bharat Bijlee Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-730-HC-MUM-IT, after closely examining the applicability of the provisions relating to slump sale, held that the essence of a slump sale transaction is a lump-sum monetary consideration. Where transfer of undertaking takes place not against monetary consideration, but against other assets, it amounts to 'exchange' and not sale. Such exchange transaction does not fall within the ambit of slump sale, which necessitates a sale transaction at the first place.

The aforesaid rulings created another anomaly wherein transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration held as not liable to income-tax. Accordingly, business reorganization through slump exchange became a preferred method.

Finance Bill proposal

Finance Bill, 2021 has proposed to remove this deficiency by modifying the definition of slump sale to cover all type of transactions. The amendment overturns a series of rulings of the HCs wherein transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration was held to be outside the purview of slump sale of the IT Act.

Can it still be argued that transfer of business undertaking is not liable to income-tax?

Finance Bill, 2021 does not provide explanation/ guidelines on the mechanism to compute capital gains in case of transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration. Accordingly, there may be divergence in the views/ positions adopted by taxpayers and the income-tax authorities in determining the amount chargeable to tax under the head 'Capital Gains' which may result into potential litigation.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Awards 2022 - Gold & Silver





Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Global Indirect Tax Lead, Wipro Enterprises Pvt Ltd sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.




Mr. Vishweshwar Mudigonda, Partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.