News Update

Pensions Department launches special drive to clear pending matters; Ease of Rule to ensure Ease of LivingUS Federal Trade Commission to file Anti-Trust lawsuit by Sept 26 against Amazon IncGovt, IMF, SARTTAC hosts global seminar on harnessing Digital Public InfrastructureIndia at UNGA - Representative calls on Pakistan to take credible action to prosecute 26/11 plannersLighthouse Festival - Goa Govt aims to highlight historic tourist spotsAzerbaijan annexes Armenian-majority populated Artsakh Republic after 2-day offensive culminating after 10-month blockadeGovt promotes Artificial Reef to rejuvenate coastal fisheries in 10 StatesGST - Cancellation of registration - Taxpayers cannot be continued to be allowed to be vexed by SCNs and orders that provide no reason, whatsoever - Costs imposed: HCCanadian PM escalates row; says Intelligence shared with India weeks ago; US calls for accountabilityGST - Cash did not form part of 'stock in trade' of appellant's business; therefore, could not have been seized - 2000 rupee notes would cease circulation by September end - Cash seized to be released and credited to petitioner's account within five days: HCSunak keen to toss cigarettes out of UKCus - Since the provisions regarding particulars required for assessment has not been declared correctly, they have not complied with Customs law in proper perspective and thus, Section 111 ibid is attracted for confiscation of goods and for imposition of redemption fine: CESTATUS to provide long-range missiles to UkraineCX - Finished goods 'Chewing Tobacco' were not wholly exempted, thus benefit of Notfn 52/2002-CE cannot be denied to demand duty on intermediate product 'Compound' manufactured and captively consumed in manufacture of Chewing Tobacco : CESTATMega fire in Taiwan golf factory; 1 dead & 10 missingST - Activity of transportation of coal from pit-heads to railway sidings within mining areas is more appropriately classifiable under head 'transport of goods by road service' and does not involve any service in relation to 'mining of mineral, oil or gas': CESTATBiden to join striking auto workers to extend supportI-T- The action of the assessee in treating expenditure as deferred revenue expenditure in the books of account will bar the assessee from claiming it as revenue expenditure for the income tax purposes: ITATJD (Secular) joins NDA for forthcoming general electionsI-T- AO was justified in intiating proceedings u/s 147 when there was relevant material to prove that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment: ITATXi goes for China-Syria ‘strategic partnership’I-T- AO erred in issuing notice for reassessment when AO lacked reasons for reopening assessment : ITATAadhaar not mandatory for electoral rolls, says ECI to SCI-T- PCIT can exercise it's revisional powers u/s 263 in cases where there is no order passed by AO or there is no proceedings under the Ac on which any order is passed : ITATTesla keen on setting up battery storage system in IndiaI-T- AO erred in disallowing assessee's claim disregarding the CBDT Circular which was in favour of the assessee : ITAT
 
Taxing the untaxed - Slump Exchange

FEBRUARY 08, 2021

By Mitesh Jain, Partner, ELP

Introduction

BUDGET 2021 was well received amongst the business fraternity with its focus on growth and fiscal expansion while simultaneously maintain the headline tax rates. While tax rates have not been tinkered with, measures have been taken to rationalize tax leakage / plug the loopholes. One such measure is widening of the definition of slump sale to cover all types of transfer of business undertaking.

Taxation of transfer of business undertaking - A long drawn litigation path

Sale of business undertaking on a going concern basis is one of the widely used modes of business reorganization as it can be quickly implemented and does not have to go through Court/ NCLT approval process.

Taxation of sale of such business undertaking has always been a contagious issue wherein the Supreme Court ('SC') while dealing with slump sale in the case of CIT v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. - 2002-TIOL-766-SC-IT-LB had held that in the absence of a specific provision in the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('IT Act') to tax sale of a business undertaking, the sale is not liable to income-tax.

The above anomaly was filled by Finance Act, 1999 inserting the provisions for explicitly taxing sale of a business undertaking. The definition of slump sale read as transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of the sale for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to the individual assets and liabilities in such sales.

Current taxation issue

During the recent years, transfer of business undertakings started taking place through various alternative mechanisms such as issue of shares or other securities for acquisition of an undertaking instead of cash consideration. Such transfers essentially are considered as 'exchange' and hence, were popularly referred to as slump exchange.

Various Courts dealt with the issue of taxation of slump exchange / transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration / consideration in kind or no consideration over the years. In M/s. Areva T&D India Ltd vs. DCIT (ITA No.561/Mds/2011), Madras High Court ('HC') held that where there is no monetary consideration involved in the transaction, the transaction ought not to be brought within the definition of the term slump sale as defined under the IT Act.

Bombay HC in CIT v. Bharat Bijlee Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-730-HC-MUM-IT, after closely examining the applicability of the provisions relating to slump sale, held that the essence of a slump sale transaction is a lump-sum monetary consideration. Where transfer of undertaking takes place not against monetary consideration, but against other assets, it amounts to 'exchange' and not sale. Such exchange transaction does not fall within the ambit of slump sale, which necessitates a sale transaction at the first place.

The aforesaid rulings created another anomaly wherein transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration held as not liable to income-tax. Accordingly, business reorganization through slump exchange became a preferred method.

Finance Bill proposal

Finance Bill, 2021 has proposed to remove this deficiency by modifying the definition of slump sale to cover all type of transactions. The amendment overturns a series of rulings of the HCs wherein transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration was held to be outside the purview of slump sale of the IT Act.

Can it still be argued that transfer of business undertaking is not liable to income-tax?

Finance Bill, 2021 does not provide explanation/ guidelines on the mechanism to compute capital gains in case of transfer of business undertaking involving non-monetary consideration. Accordingly, there may be divergence in the views/ positions adopted by taxpayers and the income-tax authorities in determining the amount chargeable to tax under the head 'Capital Gains' which may result into potential litigation.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

GST Council Recommendations - Time for ’Peek & Poke’!





Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Global Indirect Tax Lead, Wipro Enterprises Pvt Ltd sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.




Mr. Vishweshwar Mudigonda, Partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.