News Update

ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaI-T - Re-assessment is invalid where based only on a suspicion that income escaped assessment & where not based on concrete reasons to believe for commencing such proceedings : ITATImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestCus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTATNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape caseWeather prediction normal for phase 2 poll dayIndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesREC avails SACE-Covered Green Loan for 60.5 Billion Japanese YenStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideCus - 'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTATDoNER discusses Development of Tourism in North EastCX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT
 
Equalization Levy - Simplified or Amplified?

FEBRUARY 16, 2021

By Kamlesh Chainani (Partner), Pinkesh Jain (Senior Manager) and Ruchika Maheshwari (Deputy Manager) in Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP

Background

INDIA was amongst the first set of major economies to introduce Digital Services Tax ('DST') in the form of Equalisation Levy (EQL) in 2016. The scope of EQL was initially restricted to provision of digital advertising space by non-resident. The liability to discharge the EQL and undertake compliances was on the Indian residents making the payment to such non-residents, and hence, the EQL did not affect most of non-residents due to its restricted applicability and also because of the fact that practically the cost of EQL was passed on to Indian service receivers.

In the last Budget, the scope of EQL was significantly widened to cover online sale of goods as well as online sale of services. However, there were quite a few interpretation issues and the industry was grappling with the same.

Budget proposals on EQL

The government in Budget 2021 has proposed certain clarifications on controversial issues to simplify the tax administration and reduce litigation. Amongst others, Budget 2021 has proposed the following amendments to rationalize the provisions of EQL:

- EQL shall not apply on consideration which is taxable as 'royalty' and as 'Fees for Technical Services (FTS)' under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) read with the tax treaty

- Scope of "online sale of goods" and "online provision of services" is explained to include one or more of the following activities taking place online:

a) acceptance of offer for sale;

b) placing the purchase order;

c) acceptance of the purchase order;

d) payment of consideration; or

e) supply of goods or provision of services, partly or wholly  

- EQL to apply on consideration received by E-Commerce Operator ('ECO') even if goods are not owned by ECO or services are not provided by ECO (i.e., services are merely facilitated by ECO).

The above amendments will take effect retrospectively from April 1, 2020 and will accordingly apply from the assessment year 2021-22 onwards.

Key takeaways

Non-applicability of EQL provisions on income taxable as royalty/ FTS provides much relief to non-residents from double taxation and settles the ambiguity revolving around the same. Pertinent to note that non-residents may still need to test the provisions of EQL especially in cases where the transaction is not taxable as royalty/FTS.

Unexpectedly, Budget 2021 has proposed very wide definition for 'online sale of goods/services' which seems to cover in its ambit all online transactions for sale of goods/services without any exemption. It may be interesting to note that the Digital Service Tax regime in European Countries provides exemption for various services such as intra-group transactions, communication services, regulated financial services, etc. and the Industry at large was also expecting similar relaxation in India, which unfortunately has not come through.

The United States Trade Representative (USTR) initiated investigation in June, 2020 under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974 with respect to DST adopted by India, amongst other countries claiming that the digital tax imposed unilaterally by the countries is unfair and discriminatory as it is targeted majorly at digital companies in the US. India participated in these investigations and defended the EQL by stating it is not 'unfair' as it is applicable across all non-residents.

On January 6, 2021, USTR issued findings in the investigations of DST adopted by India concluding that India's DST discriminates against U.S. digital service companies, unreasonably contravenes international tax principles, and burden or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is actionable under section 301. The USTR has also highlighted EQL as having the largest scope in comparison with other DST.

USTR is not taking any specific actions in connection with the findings at this time but will continue to evaluate all available options. US being an important trade partner for India, it will have to be seen as to how expanded EQL impacts the trade relationship between the two countries. Only time will tell and test India's DST journey.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.