News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
CBIC issues fiat to put justice delivery on indefinite hold - Canon stonewalled!

MARCH 18, 2021

By R K Singh

IN the wake of the Supreme Court's order dated 9th March 2021 in the case of Canon India - 2021-TIOL-123-SC-CUS-LB that DRI cannot issue show cause notice under s. 28(4) of the Customs Act 1962 thereby rendering all such show cause notices liable to be quashed in limine, Central Board of Indirect Taxation and Customs (CBIC) has, yesterday, issued a fiat in the form of letter F No. 450/72/2021-Cus-IV to DRI that such a show cause notice "for the present and until further directions be kept pending".

2. Some of the ramifications of CBIC fiat are as under:

(i) It implies that the quasi-judicial authorities can be directed as to when to adjudicate and when not to. Thus, the independence of the quasi-judicial authorities goes for a six. Indeed, it can form a reasonable basis for approaching the Constitutional courts for taking away the adjudicatory functions from the Customs officers to maintain the sanctity of the adjudication process.

(ii) It also thumbs the nose to Supreme Court that its orders, law of the land as they are, can be thwarted by the Executive by simply directing the quasi-judicial officers not to implement them and by keeping the related matters pending indefinitely.

(iii) At a more fundamental level, CBIC has arrogated to itself the power to put on hold the justice delivery, a power which even Supreme Court will demur to claim to possess.

3. In this unseemly development, even a moment's thought does not seem to have been spared to the taxpayer's plight as to why it should be deprived of timely justice delivery even after the issue stands decided by the highest court. Strange are the ways of bureaucracy, stranger of Indian bureaucracy.

4. Fortunately, the Constitutional courts are not bound by CBIC fiats. If a taxpayer approaches the Constitutional Court for quashing a DRI notice citing the Canon judgement, in all likelihood, the Hon'ble court will oblige even before the Counsel is able to adjust his collar to address the court.

[The author is former Member CESTAT and Sr Partner, TLC Legal Advocates. The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: CBIC issues fiat to put justice delivery on indefinite hold Canon stonewalled

With all due regards to Shri R K Singh I would like to say that he has gone tangential to the issue. The Central Govt. has been vested with powers to issue directions to it's officers for the sake of uniformity in assessment and adjudication is part of assessment. There appears nothing illegal in this direction.
Kishori Lal
Principal Commissioner (Retd)

Posted by cestat cestat