News Update

Air India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and Japan10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashGST - s.107(11) - There is no fetter on the powers of the appellate authority to modify the order passed u/s 130(2) by the adjudicating authority: HCSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad caseCBDT amends jurisdiction of Pr CCITs in many citiesGST - Statutory mandate of sub-section (4) of Section 75 is that a personal hearing should be provided either, if requested for, or if an order adverse to the taxpayer is proposed to be issued: HCCCI invites proposal for launching Market Study on AI and CompetitionGST - Documents with regard to service of notice could not be located; that impugned orders came be to be passed without an opportunity being granted to Petitioner to submit documents and being heard - Matter remanded: HCIndia initiates anti-dumping duty probe against import of Telescopic Channel drawer slider from ChinaAFMS, Delhi IIT ink MoU for collaborative research & trainingCX - The activity of waste water treatment is part of manufacturing activity and any activity which is directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture would be eligible for credit: CESTATDoP&T notifies fixation of Himachal IPS cadre strength and amendment in pay rulesIndia, Cambodia ink MoU for HRD in Civil ServiceBengaluru Airport Customs seizes 10 yellow anacondas from check-in baggageST - Appellant has collected some service tax from service recipient, which has been deposited with Department, same shall not be refunded to appellant: CESTATDelhi daily air traffic goes beyond 4.7 lakh paxGovt organizing National Colloquium on Grassroots Governance2 Telangana students killed in road accident in USI-T- Addl. Commr. or above ranking officer to probe how I-T portal reflected demand being raised against assessee, despite Revenue not having issued any notice or passed any order against assessee: HCAnother tremor of 6.3 magnitude visits Taiwan; shakes tall buildingsI-T- Donations given out of accumulated funds u/s 11(2) are not allowable as application of income for charitable or religious purposes and the same shall be deemed to be income of assessee : ITATYou are arrogant Mr Musk, says Australian PM over Sydney stabbing video banUnited Health reports theft of huge Americans’ dataI-T - Travelling conveyance expenses should be disallowed to extent of bills which were not verifiable and have no nexus with business of assessee: ITATEarth Day: Biden announces USD 7 bn grant for rooftop solar panelsOECD to release annual report on Tax Inspectors without Borders on April 29EU introduces easy Schengen Visa rules for IndiansI-T- Leasehold rights in land are not within purview of section 50C of Act : ITAT
 
Wrong ITC and interest liability

SEPTEMBER 18, 2021

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

ONE of the laudable decisions taken by the GST Council in its 45th meeting held today is the decision to clarify that interest under Section 50 on wrong availment of ITC would be demanded only if such wrong credit it utilised. This issue has a chequered history. Under the erstwhile Cenvat Credit regime, the Hon'ble Madras HC has held in the case of CCE VS Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-466-HC-MAD-CX that under Rule 14 of the CCR, 2004, interest can be demanded only when the wrongly availed credit was utilised. Later, the said Rule 14 was amended to specifically provide that interest would be payable only when any wrong credit is "taken and utilised". Though the issue was thus well settled, it reared its ugly head again under GST regime, as Section 50 of the CGST Act, did not make the position so explicit.

It was being argued that since interest is prescribed under Section 50 of the Act, only for failure to pay the tax, only when the wrongly availed is utilised towards payment of tax, interest liability would arise. This view also found favour with the Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Commercial Steel Engineering Corporation Vs State of Bihar - 2019-TIOL-1585-HC-PATNA-GST .Further, the rate of interest was also a thorn in the flesh, as sub-section (1) of Section 50 has prescribed a rate of 18 % and sub-section (3) prescribed a rate of 24 %. A careful reading of sub-section (3) would reveal that the same is applicable only in circumstances covered by sections 42 (10) and 43 (10), relating to mis-match, the department used to demand 24 % interest in all cases of wrong availment of ITC. The GST Council has stepped in to clear the above controversies. To quote from the Press release,

In the spirit of earlier Council decision that interest is to be charged only in respect of net cash liability, section 50 (3) of the CGST Act to be amended retrospectively, w.e.f. 01.07.2017, to provide that interest is to be paid by a taxpayer on "ineligible ITC availed and utilized" and not on "ineligible ITC availed". It has also been decided that interest in such cases should be charged on ineligible ITC availed and utilized at 18% w.e.f. 01.07.2017.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.