News Update

Govt to partner with Private Sector in future technology: MoSHealth Ministry sets up Committee to review tax rates for smoking and smokeless tobacco products for Budget 2022COVID-19: India’s R-value continues to be below 1 since SeptemberBangladesh PM asks HM to take action against riot incitersChina appoints West-sanctioned official as Tibet Party Unit ChiefGST - No re-hearing of a concluded matter is permissible while seeking review: HCGST - Grounds urged may be grounds of appeal but would not be grounds for review within the ambit and meaning of s.114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: HCGST - Refund of accumulated ITC - CBIC Circular 160 clarifies that restriction imposed under s.54(3) does not cover goods which are subject to Nil rate/fully exempt from export duty - petition allowed: HCNDPS - Non-compliance of s.42(2) and s.50 of the Act would go to the root of the matter and vitiate the trial - Overall evidence does not at all inspire confidence and, therefore, it is highly unsafe to rely upon the same: HCCOVID-19: India reports 12K new cases with 164 deaths but graph spiralling for UK with over 49K cases in 24 hoursNITI Aayog launches Geospatial Energy Map of IndiaUS tongue-lashes attack on Hindus in BangladeshCus - IS 1460:2017 mandates that 22 parameters are to be met - There is no exception that even if a few parameters are met, the product could still be considered as HSD: CESTATGovt appoints officers with new jurisdiction for Plant Protection, Quarantine & StorageISA Assembly to debate on PM's 'One Sun One World One Grid' InitiativeRBI fines SBI Rs one crore for non-complianceCus - Burden is on the revenue, when the classification claimed by the appellant is challenged, to prove that the product is other than base oil: CESTATChinese draft legislation proposes to penalise parents for bad behaviour by children
Wrong ITC and interest liability

SEPTEMBER 18, 2021

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

ONE of the laudable decisions taken by the GST Council in its 45th meeting held today is the decision to clarify that interest under Section 50 on wrong availment of ITC would be demanded only if such wrong credit it utilised. This issue has a chequered history. Under the erstwhile Cenvat Credit regime, the Hon'ble Madras HC has held in the case of CCE VS Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-466-HC-MAD-CX that under Rule 14 of the CCR, 2004, interest can be demanded only when the wrongly availed credit was utilised. Later, the said Rule 14 was amended to specifically provide that interest would be payable only when any wrong credit is "taken and utilised". Though the issue was thus well settled, it reared its ugly head again under GST regime, as Section 50 of the CGST Act, did not make the position so explicit.

It was being argued that since interest is prescribed under Section 50 of the Act, only for failure to pay the tax, only when the wrongly availed is utilised towards payment of tax, interest liability would arise. This view also found favour with the Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Commercial Steel Engineering Corporation Vs State of Bihar - 2019-TIOL-1585-HC-PATNA-GST .Further, the rate of interest was also a thorn in the flesh, as sub-section (1) of Section 50 has prescribed a rate of 18 % and sub-section (3) prescribed a rate of 24 %. A careful reading of sub-section (3) would reveal that the same is applicable only in circumstances covered by sections 42 (10) and 43 (10), relating to mis-match, the department used to demand 24 % interest in all cases of wrong availment of ITC. The GST Council has stepped in to clear the above controversies. To quote from the Press release,

In the spirit of earlier Council decision that interest is to be charged only in respect of net cash liability, section 50 (3) of the CGST Act to be amended retrospectively, w.e.f. 01.07.2017, to provide that interest is to be paid by a taxpayer on "ineligible ITC availed and utilized" and not on "ineligible ITC availed". It has also been decided that interest in such cases should be charged on ineligible ITC availed and utilized at 18% w.e.f. 01.07.2017.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)