News Update

GST - Rule 89 - Refund of ITC - 14/2022-CT - Benefit that gets accrued by way of legislation cannot be denied/curtailed moreso when it is clarificatory in nature: HCGST - Refund of ITC - Production of shipping bills - Transmission of energy could not have been visualized when Rule 89(2) was incorporated in the Statute book: HCGST - Requiring petitioners to produce shipping bills, as proof of export cannot be made applicable to electricity as export can only be through transmission line, but not through rail, road or water for which documents can be made available: HCEconomy Needs Synergetic Inputs to fix twin Deficits of Inflation & Rupee fall43 injured in fire at Durga Puja pandals on UPAgriculture Income & ITR 7OPEC+ debate cutting production by 1 million barrels per day; Crude price up by 3%I-T - 6 months' limitation for deciding refund claims is to be followed strictly: HCBrazil’s Presidential elections: Neither candidates get 50% votes; Bolsonaro to face Lula in second round of pollI-T- Customs duty paid for yacht can be allowed as it is not used by assessee for its own personal use and has operated yacht for benefit and use of entities paying operating fee : ITATLanka reduces tax rate on sanitary napkins amid fiscal crisisI-T - No addition on account of bogus sundry creditors can be made, if AO fails to substantiate non-availability of vendors: ITATXiaomi expresses despair over attachment of Rs 5500 Cr assets in IndiaST - No service tax is payable on amount collected towards liquidated damages: CESTATTruss says her Chancellor decided himself to reduce UK’s rate for top tax bracketCX - There is no reason to deny refund when assessee has availed drawback of only the customs duty portion and not of excise duty: CESTATSexual assault case against founder of, China’s one of biggest e-commerce giants, settled in USCX - After 1.4.2011, appellant cannot avail credit on outdoor catering services, thus credit availed for period 1.4.2011 to 30.4.2011 which is part of SCN is not eligible for credit: CESTATIsrael, Lebanon about to hammer out deal on maritime tangled borderCus - First Appellate Authority was correct in allowing appeal thereby ordering provisional release of goods in question and since there is no change in facts, same is followed in case on hand as well: CESTATBurkina Faso’s junta leader agrees to dethrone himselfUkraine war - France’s spirited support being questioned; 2% arms support found lowest in EUDeath toll from Hurricane Ian mounts beyond 80 thus far in Florida & Carolina put togetherMexico braces up for Hurricane OrleneSP’s supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav is in ICU at Gurugram MedantaGovt reduces export duty on petro goods; makes Special Additional Excise Duty NIL for ATF; Rs 3.5 per litre on diesel & Rs 8000 per tonne for petrol125 die in Indonesian stampede after fans invade football ground and police hurl teargas; 180 injuredAnti-hijab fire spreads across Iran; Rallies organised throughout countryKing Charles III not to attend COP27 in Egypt on advice of Truss GovtUS, Venezuela swap prisoners - 7 Americans for 2 relatives of President MaduroUS, Japan & Australian Defence Ministers vow to work against Chinese military ambitionsWIPO’s Global Innovation Index - India walks up to 40th rankFM says IBC law cannot be allowed to lose its teeth and object
Fraudulent Evasion

AUGUST 24, 2022

By Vijay Kumar

In a recent Circular (CIRCULAR NO 13/2022 -Customs, Dated: August 16, 2022), the CBIC clarified:

it is clarified that arrest in respect of an offence, should be effected only in exceptional situations which may include:

(d) Cases involving fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of duty involving Rs 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore) or more;

A senior officer of the department sent me the Circular and asked me what the meaning of fraudulent evasion is. Can there be an evasion without fraudulent intentions? Can evasion be accidental? Don't fraud and evasion travel together?

Anyway, this is not the latest brilliance of the Board. The Customs Act in section 135 states,

Section 135. Evasion of duty or prohibitions. -

(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person -

(a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods;

In fact, even the old Sea Customs Act, 1878 had a provision in Section 167 (81), which read as:

If any person is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon ….

In State Of Maharashtra vs Umar Badshah Hassan Damudi (1974), the Bombay High Court observed,

What is fraudulent evasion is nowhere defined in the Customs Act. The Customs Act will only give an indication in a given case of a particular prohibition and whether it is contravened or violated. Mere contravention or violation of a certain prohibition may not be an offence unless the act is committed with the knowledge which constitutes the mens rea.

'Oxford Reference' explains fraudulent evasion as:

An offence under s 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 which prohibits evasion of payment of duty on imported goods or evasion of a prohibition or restriction on the import/export of goods. Under s 170(1), it must be shown that the accused knowingly performed certain acts with intent to defraud Her Majesty or with intent to evade a relevant prohibition or restriction. In relation to knowingly harbouring goods, it is usually enough to show that goods which were subject to duty were found in the possession of the accused. Under s 170(2), the word 'fraudulent' means dishonest conduct 'deliberately intended to evade the prohibition or restriction with respect to, or the duty chargeable on, goods as the case may be' : per Lord Lane CJ in  Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of   1981 ) [1982] QB 848. The offence includes more than merely entering the UK with goods concealed and with no intention of declaring them; it extends to any offending conduct which was directed and intended to lead to the prohibited importation. Offences under s 170 are continuing offences because, by definition, the evasion of a prohibition or restriction often involves a continuing series of events and is rarely limited to the moment of importation itself; 'it includes anyone who acquires possession of goods unlawfully removed from a warehouse, or anyone who hides goods on which duty has not been paid, or anyone who carries goods the importation of which is forbidden': per Griffiths LJ in  R v Neal  77 Cr App R 283

The DRI website mentions 'An information is any useful message received from the public or any person for that matter revealing fraudulent evasion of duty.

In 2012, the CBDT issued a white paper on black money in which it was stated,

The problem of tax evasion and generation of Black Money is not new. As far back as 1936, the Ayers Committee, while reviewing the income tax administration in India suggested large-scale amendments to secure the interests of the honest taxpayer and effectively deal with fraudulent evasion .

In the UK, there are lawyers advertising to assist fraudulent evaders. I could find a couple of samples:


Being charged with tax fraud potentially brings with it a risk of a very considerable sentence of several years and/or hefty fines. Tax fraud covers all criminal conduct which involves individuals or businesses paying too little tax or wrongly claiming tax repayments by acting dishonestly.  It is investigated rigorously by HMRC or by the National Crime Agency (NCA).

If you are charged with tax fraud, it could be in relation to a number of offences: fraudulent evasion of income tax; fraudulent evasion of VAT; cheating the public revenue; providing false documents or information to HMRC; and fraudulent evasion of excise duty on imported goods or smuggled goods. If you are facing any of these charges, or a combination of them, you will need expert and forensic criminal law expertise and representation. 

Defending such cases calls for a legal team with the ability to sift through vast amounts of financial information to put together the most compelling and effective defence to challenge and defeat the charges being made against you. This is our specialism, and the firm works with the very best forensic accountants and other forensic experts across the UK to this end.

Taking early action is the best way to approach a case and get the best possible outcome. Whatever your position - whether you have been charged or are about to charged with an offence - call us for an initial free and confidential consultation.

Another one:


Deliberately being dishonest about tax reporting in order to pay less tax

Declaring less income than an organisation or person has actually earned

Declaring less profits or gains

Fraudulent evasion of VAT


We have a team of experienced and dedicated solicitors who provide an excellent legal service to clients across the UK. Our experience means we can represent you at every stage of the investigation process. By negotiating fiercely and providing expert representation, we can help you secure a beneficial outcome for your circumstances. If you want to learn more about how we can assist you with tax evasion, feel free to give us a call.

Fraudulent evasion is neither new noris it of Indian origin.

Until Next week

Sub: The words used do not matter

Going by the practice of tax investigating agencies in India, every non-payment of tax is dubbed as fraudulent evasion. Every non-compliance or negligence is treated as an act with "intent to evade tax". Investigators don't care what the statute says. Period.

Posted by Gururaj B N
Sub: f r a u d u l e n t

when evasion is unknowingly and without planning or due to expert opinion or interpretation of law has happened it is accidental and hence non fraudulent evasion, meaning thereby that the intention action and execution was not with soul intention to ditch the taxchequer.

when the intention action execution etc are planned in such away that it shows that keepig in mind that is MENSREA was soley the damaging the revenue then it is fraudulent evasion.

smking by a child who has never seen the packet of ciggartte but wants to enjoy the feel of smoking knowng that it is treat bad manners is a case of non graudulent evasion,butwhen a man seein the packet many times, having read the warning there at about cancer or so and laughing on that and then smoking is an act of fraudulent evasion.

like mp mlas have passed the gst law wihout even reading the same is an act of non fraudulent evasion but officers enjoying the draconion powers abruptly coerceively is an act of fraudulent evasion and what gst council is doing bybringing the taxation through quarterly or bimnthly notifications is even beyond that sir

Posted by Navin Khandelwal