News Update

Macron’s office says India to host next AI SummitGovt revises Market Intervention Scheme guidelinesGST - Supply of DEO and Junior Engineer made to the Public Health Engineering Dept., WB govt. for executing Jal Jeevan Mission is exempted under 12/2017-CTR: AARIndia developing AI tools for public good, says PM at Paris AI SummitNITI Aayog releases Report on 'Expanding Quality Higher Education'GST - ITC for construction of mall - Order has not taken into consideration the impact of the principles of law laid down in Safari Retreat's case - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCChinese SpaceSail emerges as rival to Musk’s Starlink in global satellite marketIndia-Israel CEO Forums to strengthen Bilateral Economic TiesCus - Rule 54(2) of the SEZ Rules only stipulates for achieving positive NFE - Token penalty imposable for not achieving positive NFE in 2008-09: HCMoS launches first indigenous Bio Medical Waste Treatment Plant at AIIMSST - Appellate officer is below the rank of the officer who had issued the SCN, and which is impermissible both under the administrative law as well as under FA, 1994: HCFlash floods in Sydney - 20 persons rescuedNew Section 18A of CA, 1962 and ITC under GSTCBDT amends Rule 114DA to notify New Form No 49CCX - Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked without clear evidence of suppression or intent to evade duty: CESTATIndia, EFTA strengthen economic ties with Inauguration of DeskBrainstorming on 'Framework of Gross Domestic Knowledge Product Measurement' heldDPIIT, Korea Transport Institute sign MoU for LogisticsTrump inks Executive Order to impose 25% tariff on steel & aluminium without exception from Mar 4Japan shifts investments to US from China - USD 77 billion in 2024
 
Transform Law Commission into a Permanent Facilitator for New India

NOVEMBER 12, 2022

By TIOL Edit Team

THE appointment of Chairman and three full-time members and one part-time member of 22nd Law Commission (LC), though very belated, is a good initiative for several reasons. The appointments have been notified through two gazette notifications issued on 9th and 10th November, 2022.

First, the appointments signal the re-start of stalled legal reforms such as recommending uniform civil code (UCC) that were referred to previous LC. Second, LC's revival should make redundant public interest litigation (PIL) on unprecedented delay in appointment of new LC in the Supreme Court. This, of course, would lessen the burden on the Supreme Court and help it take up other urgent cases.

Third, 22nd LC can serve as a beacon for New India in Amrit Kaal if its multi-facet mandate is reckoned. Before elaborating this issue, consider the inordinate delay in making new LC functional.

A glance through formation of 21 LC's shows that the gap between two successive commissions was limited to few or several months. In 22nd LC case, this gap or institutional vacuum, was more than 4 years. The previous 21st LC ceased to exist on 31st August 2018. On 21st February 2020, the Government notified the constitution of 22 nd LC with a tenure of three years. It made the appointments now when the Commission is left with only half of its tenure.

To avoid such delays and Cabinet approvals each time, when a new LC is constituted, the Government should make LC a permanent body on lines of numerous other commissions such as election commission.

After all, enacting new laws, weeding out outdated laws are not on-and-off exercises. Neither are resolution of legal complexities arising from poor drafting of bills. Nor are the provision of solutions to different ministries when faced with legal challenges. Good laws and legal reforms are the key to sustaining and strengthening the democracy and all organs of the Government.

Apart from making LC a permanent institution, the Government should consider transforming LC into a statutory commission. This is not to suggest that LC's recommendations should be binding on the Government. It should, however, be obliged to take a decision on LC reports with specified timelines. At present, the Government avoids taking any decision on some LC reports and takes very long time to decide on others.

Grant of statutory status would empower it to improve efficiency of reforms process. It would elevate LC's stature in the institutional and governance framework.

It is here pertinent to recall a little-known fact that UPA regime intended to grant statutory status to LC. The then Law Minister, M. Veerappa Moily, told Lok Sabha on 25th November 2010: "A proposal to give statutory status to Law Commission of India is under active consideration. Presently the proposal is at the stage of preparation of Bill for the purpose." Whatever be the Government reservations on LC empowerment, no one can deny the fact that LC has made invaluable contribution to Indian polity, society and economy through its reports over the decades.

Turn now to the 22nd LC's mandate. It has 10-point terms of reference (ToR) with few specific jobs listed under each term, making the mandate very exhaustive and serious.

A few vital elements of the mandate need to be cited to underscore the need to transform LC into a permanent institution where vacancies should be allowed to occur.

One key job mentioned in ToR is: "Identify laws which are not in harmony with the existing climate of economic liberalisation and need change." It also required to identify laws, which otherwise, require changes and accordingly suggest amendments.

Another vital task is to "examine the impact of globalization on food security, unemployment and recommend measures for the protection of the interests of the marginalised."

LC is also entrusted with responsibility to scrutinize laws that affect the poor and carry out post-audit for socio-economic legislations. It's mandate includes examining the existing laws in the light of Constitution's Directive Principles of State Policy. It is required to recommend "such legislations as might be necessary to implement the Directive Principles and to attain the objectives set out in the Preamble of the Constitution."

The mandate calls for LC's suggestions for "suitable measures for quick redressal of citizens grievances, in the field of law."

ToR requires LC to revise the Central Acts of general importance so as to simplify them and to remove anomalies, ambiguities and inequities, apart from identifying obsolete laws that should be repealed. The mandate, thus implicitly serves as a powerful rationale for making LC a permanent institution for realizing Amrit Kaal vision.

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   



TIOL Tube Latest

Former Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, delivering his Award Acceptance Speech after receiving TIOL Fiscal Heritage Award 2022 on Nov 8 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy