News Update

Air fares down by 14% to 61% after Govt steps in: ScindiaMPC goes for no change in repo rate; GDP growth projected to be 6.5%Even if China is a Candy, unplugging is only future for Western MNCs!Monsoon finally soaks Kerala today: IMDI-T - AO should not trigger reassessment proceedings simply on basis of information made available to him which had its source in insight portal: HCUK to host world’s first summit on AIDomestic pax doubled from 60 mn in 2014 to 143 mn in 2020: ScindiaCanadian wildfire smokes envelope North-East US; Air-quality warning issuedI-T- Late fees u/s 234E of Act can be levied only prospectively w.e.f. 01.06.2015 : ITATKenyan Finance Bill triggers protests; Police make good use of tear gas shellsIndian defence sector on cusp of major revolution under 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat': Defence SecyVolvo showcases first all-electric SUVST - A sub-contractor would be liable to pay Service Tax even if main contractor has discharged Service Tax liability on activity undertaken by sub-contractor in pursuance of contract: CESTATIndia will have 200 airports in next 5 yrs: Scindia25 lakh food business operators to be trained by FSSAI in next 3 yearsOver 80% Indian depositing Rs 2000 note in account; not exchanging: ReportST - Charges of suppression of tax are not sustainable when assessee is maintaining proper records & is filing statutory documents & also underwent an audit: CESTATIndia-US trade dialogue - Export control regulations reviewedIndia has emerged as 2nd Largest Producer of Crude Steel in world: Minister
Settlement still a viable option?

MARCH 21, 2023

By Anurag Kapur, Associate Partner & Sonam Yadav, Senior Associate, Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys

THE Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission ('Settlement Commission') was constituted under the Central Excise Act, 1944 with the aim of providing alternate dispute resolution mechanism to taxpayers who wanted to resolve tax disputes in the spirit of conciliation rather than litigation.

The impediment in speedy resolution by Settlement Commission was the absence of a definite time frame for disposal of applications.This seems to have caught the attention of Central Government who has now proposed a time bound resolution by the Settlement Commission.

The Finance Bill, 2023 ('Bill') proposes to amend Section 127C of the Customs Act, 1961by inserting sub-section (8A) which prescribes a time limit of 9 months (extendable by 3 months) for passing an order on the application. This time limit shall be reckoned from the last day of the month in which the application under Section 127B is filed by the applicant. Interestingly, the time limit to dispose application was introduced back in 2007also but was omitted in 2015 1. It has now been proposed to be re-introduced by this Bill.

While the proposed amendment providing for time bound disposal of applications may be a welcome step, one cannot ignore that it could produce an incongruous result of shutting the doors of settlement for an applicant, if no order is passed within the stipulated period.

The power of Settlement Commission to waive/reduce penalty and grant immunity from prosecution has been an important guiding factor for an applicant to opt for this route, as opposed to going through the perils of a long-drawn litigation. However, to approach the Settlement Commission, the applicant must make a true and full disclosure of his duty liability. After the proposed amendment comes into effect, one can't help but wonder if this would prove to be a double-edged sword for the applicants. Not only does the adjudicating Authority not have the power to grant immunity from prosecution, but disclosures made before the Settlement Commission may also be used by them to impose usury penalties on the applicants.

In the past, many assesses have challenged similar provisions existing under different statutes 2. Various Courts have read down the provisions to hold that proceedings before the Settlement Commission would abate only if it failed to pass an order within the specified period for "reasons attributable to applicant". Such reasons would generally depend on the facts and circumstances of each case and would need to be analysed independently.

In our view, the proposed amendments relating to abatement of proceedings may not only inhibit a bona fide defaulter from approaching the Settlement Commission but also proliferate litigation, much against the spirit of Settlement Commission. Only time will tell whether this proposed amendment can be viewed as a relief or setback to an applicant who genuinely seeks settlement.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]


1 Omitted w.e.f 14.05.2015 by s. 87 of the Finance Act, 2015 (20 of 2015)

2 Section 245HA of the Income Tax Act, 1961; Section 32(F)6of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)


TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Awards 2022 - Gold & Silver

Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Global Indirect Tax Lead, Wipro Enterprises Pvt Ltd sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.

Mr. Vishweshwar Mudigonda, Partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP sharing his thoughts at the TIOL Awards 2022 event.