News Update

Cabinet greenlight for 3 more semiconductor units; construction to begin in 100 daysSC Constitution Bench reverses own decision on automatic expiry of HC stay orders after 6 monthsCabinet okays plan to set up rooftop solar units for one crore householdsGDP likely to grow by 8.4% in Q4: GovtCabinet okays proposal to set up International Big Cat AllianceCore sector rises by 3.6% in Jan monthNational One Health Mission - Cabinet okays creation of Director-level post at National Institute of One Health, NagpurService Matter - Claim for compassionate appointment not to be considered as regular mode of appointment; is intended to address penurious situation in immediate aftermath of breadwinner passing away: SCDespite several wins NDA short of 3 seats of majority in Rajya SabhaCus - Liability incurred by noticee company which merged with petitioner company cannot stand extinguished on account of its merger: HCSEBI urges Mutual Fund operators to protect small, midcap investors amid surge in inflowCus - Merger or amalgamation of companies is not a tool under law to either facilitate avoidance and evasion of tax liability already incurred by a transferor company - SCN proceeding cannot be scuttled: HCCustoms Department recovers 206-year old smuggled telescope used by British East India Company, hands over to ASIST - Classification of services - Only remedy available is to file an appeal before the Supreme Court u/s 35L of the CEA, 1944 - Petition is dismissed as withdrawn: HCSC scotches plea to reopen Thoothukudi Sterlite copper plantGST - Cancellation of registration - Order records that petitioner did not reply to SCN or appear in person, however, counsel for revenue submits otherwise - Matter remanded - In the meantime, petitioner will not enjoy benefits of registration: HCSandeskhali row - TMC leader Shahjahan nabbed; sent to 10-day police custodyGST - Section 107 operates as a complete code in itself, explicitly delineating limitation periods for filing appeals and implicitly excluding the application of general limitation provisions: HCFrench Senate votes to make abortion a Constitutional rightGST - Cancellation of registration - Cryptic notices and orders - Respondent authorities will not be able to exercise revisional powers, hence orders set aside and matter remanded: HCDomicile of Origin vs Domicile of Choice: No visits to temple may prove fatal! (See TII 'Edit')Trump's return to Oval Office! China sweating like just out of heated hammam!India on Pakistan at UN: ‘Can’t pay heed to a country soaked in Red’I-T - Share premium received by issuance of shares is on capital account and gives rise to no income: HCFrench Senate okays move to make abortion a constitutional rightGovt notifies certain provisions of SEZ Act & Rules to apply to notifications issued under IFSCA Act, 2019‘Mob Rule’ replacing democracy in UK: Sunak warns copsSolar-powered US Moon Lander to be ‘put to sleep’ for 3 weeks and to be switched on after lunar nightsAnti-dumping duty on Acetone: Notification amended to change name of M/s INEOS Phenol Singapore Pte
New Bharat needs Electoral-cum-Fiscal Reforms

DECEMBER 07, 2023

By TIOL Edit Team

WITH the Euphoria or dismay over the results of five States subsiding, time is ripe to pave the way for electoral-cum-fiscal reforms.

The reforms should envisage legislation for prudent debt ceilings for both the Centre and the States. The ceilings would serve as built-in check against uncontrolled political gush to shower freebies on voters.

The reforms should also include introduction of simultaneous polls for Lok Sabha, State Assemblies and local governance bodies. This initiative would squeeze frequent political competition over doling out freebies into once-in-years freebies war. (Turn a delayed electoral initiative into a big-bang reform AUGUST 03, 2016)

Thus electoral-cum-fiscal reforms, when integrated, can serve as credible rein for freebies horses that go wild in each and every election. Political class rationalizes dole-outs as the quest to fulfil the Constitution's social welfare-focused Directive Principles.

Freebies thus can't be banned. They can, however, be regulated by 1) enacting debt ceiling laws as envisaged by the Constitution 3) Revised fiscal responsibility laws and 3) by restricting holding of elections to an event held once in five years. (Time for a Constitutional call on institutionalized corruption MARCH 29, 2011)

We thus urge all governments, political parties and the Supreme Court to shift gears from narrower freebies turf to enlarged perspective of multi-facet reforms.

The new opportunity for the change-over is available in the Union Cabinet's approval of the terms of reference (ToR) for 16th Finance Commission on 29th November.

Couple this with the fact that the Government had constituted in September 2023 a committee under the chairmanship of Former President of India, Ram Nath Kovind. Its key mandate is to study and suggest roadmap for holding simultaneous elections to Lok Sabha, State legislatures, municipalities and panchayats.

As put by the Government notification constituting this panel, "elections are held almost every year and within a year too at different times, which result in massive expenditure by the Government and other stakeholders, diversion of security forces and other electoral officers engaged in such elections from their primary duties for significantly prolonged periods, disruption in developmental work on account of prolonged application of Model Code of Conduct, etc."

The Supreme Court has already been hearing a bunch of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions against freebies promised by political parties to woo voters.

The hearings generated few good suggestions. One proposal was to form a committee of experts on freebies under the aegis of apex court. Another idea that emerged was to strive for political consensus on electoral freebies. Yet another idea was to enact a law to control freebies.

The recent polls witnessed bitter freebies war between the BJP and other political parties. It opened a new chapter in open-budgeting of freebies with the Union Cabinet approving on 29th November extension of free ration for the poor for next five years with an estimated expenditure Rs 11.80 Lakh crore.

The cabinet thus formalized Mr. Modi's announcement of this bonanza for 81.35 crore persons on 4th November at an election rally at Durg in Chhattisgarh. It is here pertinent to recall the fact that Mr. Modi had last year mocked & disapproved forcefully freebies as rewris/revaris, a popular Indian candy.

(Decode Freebies Maze to free Growth Genie DECEMBER 03, 2022)

The free-ration decision is unprecedented in the one-track, open-budgeting under which political parties or governments offer revari to voters. Such declarations are one-track as they deal only with the expenditure with assumption that money grows on trees or can be borrowed without any limit.

They don't specify how the expenditure on new or expended freebies would be financed. At present, all expenditure on freebies can be deemed as debt-financed as both the Centre and States borrow to repay past loans and fund new expenditure every year. Modi Government took foreign loans to fund free ration scheme during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The government borrowings have breached the prudential limits - a fact borne by repeated amendments to the rules of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act (FRBMA). (Replace FRBMA with debt ceiling law as mooted by Dr. Ambedkar June 30, 2016)

The country urgently needs two-way open budgeting of freebies with political parties specifying how they would finance them. Would resources be raised through fresh loans? Would they be financed by cutting capital expenditure on projects such as building roads and dams? Would they be funded through taxation route? The freebies-loving, gullible voters don't seek such information.

The freebies issue has been debated for years without realizing that it can be resolved by invoking Articles 292 & 293 of the Constitution. The former provision provides for legislation to limit the debt that can be raised by the Centre. Similar, latter envisages law by state assemblies to cap borrowings of respective State Governments.

The 15th Finance Commission and FRBM Review Committee, which submitted its report in 2017, both recommended resort to the twin Articles to usher in sustainable debt management in freebies-infected politico-governance system. Modi Government has avoided acting on the recommendation for debt ceiling law for the Central Government as it can serve as deterrent to its political passion for freebies. It has not even put in place new FRBM framework as recommended by 15th Finance Commission.

The Government has not specified review of fiscal responsibility framework in the ToR approved for 16th Finance Commission (FC). We urge the Government to include this gazette notification, constituting the FC. This situation puts the ball for statutory debt capping in the Supreme Court.

It remains to be seen whether the Apex Court would ever ask the Government to justify its reluctance to legislate debt ceiling law. It is anybody's guess whether Supreme Court would feel compelled to issue writ of mandamus to the Centre and the States under Article 292 & 293, in its judgment on freebies.

Put simply, India needs to clip the borrowing wings of the governments to checkmate freebies frenzy, improve the quality of welfare schemes and to reboot the economy's growth momentum.


TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023

Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT

Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023