News Update

Ukrainian army training Syrian rebels how to use drones against Russian army in SyriaThe kernel of Trumponomics is tariff, tariff & tariff!Union Budget, 2025 - Another SVLDRS is the need of the hourI-T- Delay in verification of ITR and Form 10B merits being condoned in interests of justice, where there is no delay in filing audit report in Form 10B: ITATDRI's investigative insights instrumental in addressing gaps in policy making: CBIC ChairmanI-T - Contingent liability of import duty on capital goods liability will trigger only when assessee does not meet targeted earning of foreign exchange: ITATMinistry of Coal gears up to launch 11th Round of AuctionsI-T - Financing transactions relating to real estate between two sister concerns, born out of commercial expidiency, calls for no addition: ITATMGNREGA: 10K houses being constructed daily with reduced completion timelineI-T- Revisionary power cannot be exercised solely because PCIT disagrees with view taken by AO, more so where original assessment order is passed after making due enquiry: ITATNITI Aayog launches 'Trade Watch Quarterly' in New DelhiI-T - If there is no striking off either of limbs of Sec 271(1)(c) as to for what reason penalty is being proposed to be imposed, then notice issued u/s 274 r/w/s 271(1)(c) is invalid: ITATGST - CBIC amends Circular No 31 of 2018 to clarify on 'Proper officer under Ss 73 and 74I-T - Once interest on housing loan on acquisition of capital asset is allowed u/s 24(b), then same can't be allowed by adding to cost of acquisition of capital asset u/s 48, to compute capital gains: ITATG20 declaration - Taxing super-rich's wealth - Making Modi Govt. accountableI-T- Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi)(via) cannot be denied where ambiguities arise in Form 10 due to discrepancies in the ITR and not due to any error on part of assessee: ITATEU quickens pace to ink trade deal with MercosurGST - Cancellation of registration - No reply was filed in response to SCN and the appeal against order was also filed after more than a year - Petitioner firm is not entitled for any relief on the ground of being lethargic in approach : HCGM to take hit of USD 5 bn on reduced value of Chinese JVGST - SCN issued in name of a company which ceased to exist on account of its amalgamation, is invalid: HCUnitedHealth CEO shot dead in NY 'targeted' attackDGFT - provisions of Section 28AA of the Customs Act cannot be applied to levy interest on repayment of duty credit scrip: HCTelangana recruits 44 transgenders as traffic assistantsGST - Commissioner to take appropriate measures to ensure that officials concerned are sensitised regarding passing of appropriate orders in accordance with law and not mechanical orders: HCCBI raids 10 places in Delhi in Rs 117 Cr international cyber fraud caseGST - Contents of the petitioner's reply have been scanned and re-printed; even the letter head of the petitioner has been printed in the said order - Respondent has not applied his mind - Order quashed: HCBritain bans daytime junk food TV ads including burgers and muffinsGST - Rectification - limitation for filing appeal would start from date of rejection of rectification application & not from date of original assessment order: HCMoscow, Pyongyang defence pact comes into forceST - Assessee was not given proper notice to clarify correct classification of services - Demand rightly quashed: CESTATFall-out of martial law: South Korean Defence Minister puts in papersCX - Negligence or doubt about duty obligations alone cannot trigger extended limitations; that assessee acted in bona fide belief of goods not being dutiable, does not invite invoking extended limitation: CESTATHard Left in France urges President Macron to hold early elections after govt voted outCX - Section 11D, applicable to exempt excisable goods, could not apply to Zinc Ash which was deemed non-excisable: CESTATRailways grants Rs 60K Crore subsidy on tickets annually: MinisterCX - As is trite law, if shortage is very negligible & there is no allegation of clandestine removal or even no proof of excess clearance of final products or inputs as such, availment of Cenvat credit by manufacturer is valid: CESTAT
 
Import of Elisa Test Kits and Reagents with Benefit of Notification

NOVEMBER 25, 2024

By S K Rahman, IRS, working as Principal Commissioner (AR) at CESTAT Delhi

ON 29th October 2024, the Hon'ble CESTAT Principal Bench Delhi has passed an interesting Order 2024-TIOL-1000-CESTAT-DEL on import of ELISA test kits and reagents denying the benefit of Notification as they were being imported for food testing where as benefit of Notification was available for diagnostic use

2. BRIEF FACTS OF CASE: The Appellant has imported Elisa Test Kits falling under CTH. 38220090 and reagents. They have claimed benefit of the following Notifications.

Period
Customs Notif No. dt.
Rate
CE/ IGST Notif No. dt.
Rate
Upto 30.06.2017
12/2012-Cus dt. 17-03-2012 Sl No. 148 (A) List 4 Sl. No. 36 ELISA kits
-Nil-
12/2012-CE dt. 17-03-2012 Sl No. 108 (A ) List 4 Sl. No. 36 ELISA kits
-Nil-
From 01.07.2017
50/2017-Cus dt. 30.06.2017 Sl. No. 167(A) List 4 Sl. No. 32 ELISA kits
-Nil-
01/2017-IT(R) dt. 28.06.2017 ELISA kits Schedule I Sl No. 180
5%

50/2017-Cus dt. 30.06.2017 Sl. No. 249A CTH 38220090

As amended by Notif No. 49/2018-Cus dt 20.06.2018 From 20.06.2018 to 05.07.2019

Diagnostics Reagents As further amended by Notif No. 25/2019-Cus dt 06.07.2019 From 06.07.2019 All goods

10%
01/2017-IT(R) dt. 28.06.2017 All Diagnostics kits and reagents Schedule II Sl No. 80
12%

2 Two live Bill Of Entries were withheld. The description given in the Invoice/packing list was the name of test Kit or name of reagent. But the importer has declared the description in Bill of Entry as name of test Kit or name of reagent suffixed with the words "for diagnostics use only" which were not there in Invoice/packing list with intention to claim the benefit of notification which says "diagnostics test kits specified in list 4." In the list 4 at Sl. No. 32 or 36, ELISA kits exists. These imported ELISA Kits are being used for food testing which is admitted by importer and no dispute about it. The Appellant importer had been declaring the imported goods as "testing kits for food" until May, 2019. Later w.e.f. June, 2019 onwards the appellants changed the description by adding the words "for diagnostic use only". The dispute is whether the food testing kits imported by the appellant can be treated as diagnostic kits in terms of the exemption notification

3. The Counsel for appellant has argued that

i. food testing kits are covered under the definition of the term "diagnostic kits" mentioned in the exemption notifications as they are used for diagnosis of adulteration of the Food.

ii. The learned counsel relied on the decision in M.J. Pharmaceuticals Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi

4. Shri S.K. Rahman, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that

i. the impugned goods viz. kits and reagents are used exclusively for food testing kits only and are not meant for diagnostic purposes of human beings (including animals).

ii. HSN Explanatory Notes for CTH 3822, the Diagnostic reagents are used in the evaluation of physical, biophysical or biochemical processes and states in animals and humans that too for vitro purposes

5. Invoice – BE Description.:- (ref para 9) The impugned goods are actually the food testing kits and not ELISA kits for diagnostic purposes as is evident from the invoices, which do not mention that the ELISA kits are for diagnostic use though the same has been mentioned in the two B/Es.

6. Change description in BE:- (ref para 10) w.e.f. June, 2019 onwards the appellants changed the description by adding the words "for diagnostic use only". The obvious reason is that the appellant was aware that the testing kits for food are not eligible for exemption and it is only the kits, which are used for diagnostic purposes fall within the exemption notifications

7. Foreign Supplier:- (ref para 12)The overseas supplier of the appellant M/s Romer Labs, Singapore PTE Ltd. is a manufacturer of food testing kits and reagents. The information is given by them on their website - https://www.romerlabs.com. Therefore, logically the conclusion is that the goods imported by the appellant were food testing kits. Even the literature produced by the appellant in this regard establishes that the kits imported were exclusively food testing kits

8. Life Saving: (ref para 13) The emphasis in the description used in Notification No.50/2017 is on the words "life saving" as each of the clauses (A, B, C) of serial no.167 uses the expression "life saving drugs or medicines", which means that it can only be related to animal or human and not to food items.

9. Medical purpose: (ref para 14) Serial No.167(A), embraces not only the drugs or medicines, but also includes their salts and esters and diagnostics test kits as specified in List 4, which at Sl.No.32 provides, "Enzyme Linked Immuno absorbent Assay, ELISA KITS". Therefore, the adjudicating authority rightly interpreted that the expression Enzyme Linked Immuno absorbent Assay, ELISA KITS are preceded by the words in Serial No. 167(A), i.e., life saving drugs, medicines, including their salts and ester and diagnostics test kits. In simple words the notification at Sl.No.167 intends to exempt goods meant for medical purpose such as medicines/drugs and diagnosis kits.

10. HSN Explanatory Notes CTH 3822: (ref para 17)The Diagnostic reagents are used in the evaluation of physical, biophysical or biochemical processes and states in animals and humans that to for vitro purposes. Notification benefit is for "Diagnostic reagents". Diagnostic reagents are any organic or inorganic compounds that are added to an analyte or biological specimen, like urine, a blood sample, or biopsied human tissue, to determine pathogenesis or abnormalities.

11. Meaning of "Diagnostic":- The term "diagnostic" in the Oxford dictionary is defined as "connected with finding out exactly what a problem is and what caused it, especially an illness". Further in Merriam Webster dictionary, it is defined as "of, relating to, or used in diagnosis". The term "diagnosis" is defined as "the art or act of identifying a disease from its signs and symptoms. This also strengthens the above view that diagnostic means related to evaluation of physical biophysical or biochemical processes and states in animals and humans for detection of illness

12. Can diagnostic purpose be for food testing ?: (ref para 18)The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that the diagnostic purpose can be for food testing also is unsustainable in the context of the exemption notification which has to be construed and interpreted in the light of the words/expressions used therein. The Apex Court in Union of India Vs. Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd. = 2011-TIOL-21-SC-CX said "It is not permissible to import provisions in a taxing statute so as to supply any assumed deficiency"

13. Defination of "Diagnostic" :- The Authorised Representative has countered the arguments of the counsel for the appellant by relying upon case law of Madras High Court in Chinese University of Hong Kong and Sequenom, Inc. v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, CMA (PT) No.14 of 2023. In this case the Madras High Court has ruled that the term "diagnostic" in the Patents Act should be limited to processes that disclose pathology for the treatment of human beings. Thus, when viewed in context, the Court concluded that the word "diagnostic" should be limited to diagnostic processes that disclose pathology for the treatment of human beings.

14. The Hon'ble CESTAT has observed (ref para 19)that "the observations made by learned Authorised Representative are relevant to interpret the expression used in the notification and distinguishing the goods, which are meant for food testing."

15. Strict interpretation of Notification: The Authorised Representative submitted that the Notifications are to be interpreted strictly for giving the benefit of Notification and in this regard, the following case laws are relied upon.

1. (S.C.)[30-07-2018] COMMISSIONER OF CUS. (IMPORT), MUMBAI Versus DILIP KUMAR & COMPANY = 2018-TIOL-302-SC-CUS-CB
2. (S.C.) [18-11-2010] COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., NEW DELHI Versus HARI CHAND SHRI GOPAL = 2010-TIOL-95-SC-CX-CB
3. (S.C.) [14-09-1994] NOVOPAN INDIA LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF C. EX. AND CUSTOMS, HYDERABAD = 2002-TIOL-89-SC-CX-LB
4. (S.C.) 1978 HEMRAJ GORDHANDAS Versus H.H. DAVE, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF C. EX. & CUSTOMS = 2002-TIOL-351-SC-CX -CB

The Hon'ble CESTAT has observed (ref para 20)that "following the aforesaid principles, we find that the appellant has failed to discharge the burden that ELISA kits imported by the appellant falls within the parameters of the exemption notification."

16. The Hon'ble CESTAT has observed (ref para 21)that "learned Counsel for the appellant has relied on the decision of this Tribunal in M.J. Pharmaceuticals (supra), however, we find that the said decision does not supports the case of the appellant."

17. Considering all the above the Hon'ble CESTAT has passed Order 2024-TIOL-1000-CESTAT-DEL (ref para 23) that "In view of our discussion above, we conclude that ELISA kits imported by the appellant were not used in the evaluation of physical, biophysical or biochemical processes and states in animals and humans, and as a result, they were not diagnostic reagent/kits rather they were meant to be used for food testing and, therefore, did not fulfil the criteria to avail the benefit of expression as per the notification"

18. The take aways from the above case are :

i. ELISA test kits when imported for "food testing" are not eligible for benefit of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus dt. 30.06.2017 (earlier 12/2012-Cus dt. 17-03-2012)

ii. "Diagnostic" purposes means the processes that disclose pathology for the treatment of human beings.If kits and reagents are used exclusively for food testing kits only and are not meant for diagnostic purposes of human beings (including animals).

iii. The Notifications are to be interpreted strictly for giving the benefit of Notification.

iv. Departmental officers shall compare the description of goods given in Bill of Entry and compare with description given in Invoice. They shall be alert in case the importer adds certain words to description in Bill of Entry which are not there in Invoice that too with an intention to take benefit of Notification.

(The views expressed are personal and not in official capacity)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Conferment of TIOL Awards 2024. The event was held on October 1, 2024 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy