News Update

GST - Failure to avail the opportunity granted is different from failure to grant an opportunity of hearing - Fault lies with petitioner and he cannot blame the department - Petition dismissed: HCGST - Orders came to be passed behind the back of the petitioner - No steps taken to serve notices through physical mode but made available only under tab 'View Additional notices' - Matter remanded subject to petitioner depositing 10% of disputed tax: HCGST - When two opinions are possible, the one which is advantageous to the assessee should be taken - Matter remitted: HCGST - Not only has the competent authority failed to notice or engage with the reply which was submitted but has proceeded on the incorrect premise that no response had been submitted at all - Order set aside: HCCus - Assessees were held entitled to seek redemption of gold seized from them on their appearance before requisite authority, after complying with prescribed conditions: HCKVAT - addition of purchase turnover of old gold to estimated sales turnover erroneous as it results in duplication of turnover, where purchases were of old ornaments melted for creation of new ones: HCCBDT issues FAQs on Revised Guidelines for compounding of offencesST - Service tax demand confirmed against appellant citing forged agreements, misdeclaration of taxable services and deliberate tax evasion: CESTATCurfew imposed in Nagpur after violence erupts over Aurangzeb rowST - Rectification of O-i-O is invalidated where AO seeks to revisit & change findings, which goes beyond scope of Sec 74 of Finance Act 1994, which only permits correction of mistakes apparent & clerical errors: CESTATIsrael triggers avalanche of air strikes at Gaza as Ceasefire fails; 66 killedCX - Genuine refund claims should not be denied due to procedural technicalities when clear evidence of double duty payment is provided: CESTAT9th India-Australia Defence Policy talks held in New DelhiCX - The amount deposited during an investigation is not a pre-deposit under Section 35FF but a revenue deposit making it eligible for interest at 12% per annum: CESTATTaiwan detects 9 Chinese warships & 59 aircraft encircling island countryCus - Aircraft engine stands should be classified under CTH 8609 00 00 as 'containers for transport' rather than under CTH 8716 39 00 as 'trailers,' thereby setting aside the demand for differential customs duty: CESTATTrump urges Putin not to slaughter Ukrainian troopsCus - Royalty & technical fees need not be included in transaction value of imported goods, as they are not a condition of sale for imported items: CESTATGovt e-Marketplace surpasses Rs 5 Lakh Crore GMVCus - Dabur India Ltd's refund claim is upheld for excess CVD paid on imports holding that company had borne the duty burden itself and did not pass it on to consumers, thereby overcoming the bar of unjust enrichment: CESTATAustralian patient is first to survive for 100 days with titanium heartI-T - Allowance in respect of bad debts u/s 36(1)(vii) is allowable only if debt was taken into account for computing income of assessee in previous year in which amount is written off: HCH7N9 bird flu outbreak spreads to more cities in USI-T- Delay in filing ITR ought to be condoned where factors such as issues in I-T portal & operational challenges due to COVID pandemic, were not considered: HCNo directive to mining companies to review EIA for carbon emissions: MinisterI-T - If assessee has not proved genuineness of purchases, which inter alia include source of making payment for such purchases, such case calls for addition u/s 69C: HCPM Modi joins Trump-owned social media platform Truth SocialI-T - AO can initiate reassessment proceedings for year which has already been assessed u/s.143(3), if material information was not disclosed correctly & truly by assessee: ITATMoS inaugurates QUAD Workshop on pandemic preparedness for Indo-Pacific RegionI-T - No TDS is applicable u/s 194C on fuel charges paid by assessee if same was reimbursed on cost-to-cost basis: ITATDoval chairs meet of intelligence heads, including three from Five Eyes AllianceI-T - AO can't disallow commission expenses incurred by insurance company, without examining PAN details along with related documents placed on record by way of additional evidence under Rule 29: ITATFirst things First - The DIN!
 
GST Treatment of Vouchers: Legislative and Judicial Perspectives

FEBRUARY 18, 2025

By CA Hunny Munjal

1. Introduction

THE taxability of vouchers under the Goods and Services Tax ('GST') regime has been the subject of extensive legal scrutiny and debate. The recent amendments to GST laws, particularly the omission of the provisions governing the time of supply for vouchers, have provided clarity in respect of taxability of vouchers. This article examines the evolving legal landscape regarding vouchers, the implications of the recent changes, and the potential challenges that lie ahead.

2. Judicial Pronouncements on Vouchers

Historically, the classification of vouchers under GST has been debated in courts. Two key judicial rulings have significantly influenced the interpretation of vouchers:

- Sodexo SVC India Pvt. Ltd. 2015-TIOL-293-SC-MISC-

15…After going through the relevant provisions and the principle laid down in various judgments explaining the features of 'services' and 'goods', we are of the opinion that the Sodexo Meal Vouchers cannot be treated as 'goods' for the purpose of levy of Octroi or LBT.

27… We, thus, allow these appeals and set aside the judgment of the High Court by holding that Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not 'goods' within the meaning of Section 2(25) of the Act and, therefore, not liable for either Octroi or LBT.

- Premier Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd. 2023-TIOL-158-HC-KAR-GST -

21. It is not in dispute that the vouchers involved in the instant petition are semi-closed Pre-paid Payment Instruments [PPIs] in which the goods or services to be redeemed are not identified at the time of issuance. Vouchers are distributed to its employees or the customers which can be redeemed by them. These PPIs do not permit cash withdrawal, irrespective of whether they are issued by banks or non-banking Companies and they can be issued only with the prior approval of RBI.

22. In substance the transaction between the assessee and his clients is procurement of printed forms and their delivery. The printed forms are like currency. The value printed on the form can be transacted only at the time of redemption of the voucher and not at the time of delivery of vouchers to assessee's client. Therefore, the issuance of vouchers is similar to pre-deposit and not supply of goods or services. Hence, vouchers are neither goods nor services and, therefore, cannot be taxed.

These rulings laid the foundation for legislative changes aimed at bringing greater consistency to the treatment of vouchers under GST.

3. Legislative Amendments: Omission of Time of Supply Provisions

Previously, Sections 12(4) and 13(4) of the CGST Act prescribed specific time of supply rules for vouchers. These provisions created ambiguity, particularly concerning vouchers where the supply of goods or services was not identifiable at the time of issuance. The GST Council, in its 55th meeting, recommended the deletion of these provisions, which has now been implemented through legislative amendments.

Clause 117 of the Finance Bill, 2025 seeks to omit sub-section (4) of section 12 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act so as to remove the provision for time of supply in respect of transaction in vouchers, the same being neither supply of goods nor supply of services.

Clause 118 of the Finance Bill, 2025 seeks to omit sub-section (4) of section 13 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act so as to remove the provision for time of supply in respect of transaction in vouchers, the same being neither supply of goods nor supply of services.

The removal of these provisions effectively aligns the GST treatment of vouchers with judicial interpretations.

4. Clarification issued

To bring uniformity in the treatment of vouchers, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs ('CBIC') had issued Circular No. 243/37/2024-GST on 31st December 2024.

This circular provides much-needed clarification on various aspects of voucher taxation, including:

- Nature of Vouchers: The circular reiterates that vouchers are neither 'goods' nor 'services' but instead qualify as actionable claims. Therefore, their mere issuance does not attract GST.

- Principal-to-Principal Transactions: When vouchers are distributed between entities on a principal-to-principal ('P2P') basis, they remain outside the scope of GST as no supply of goods or services occurs.

- Commission-Based Distribution: In cases where vouchers are distributed by agents or intermediaries on a commission or fee basis, the commission or fee charged by the intermediary is liable to GST as a taxable service.

- Additional Services: If services such as advertisement, co-branding, marketing, technology support, or customization are provided in connection with vouchers, GST applies to the consideration received for these services.

- Unredeemed Vouchers (Breakage Revenue): If vouchers remain unredeemed after their expiry period, the revenue recorded as breakage is not subject to GST since no supply of goods or services occurs.

5. Conclusion

The removal of the time of supply provisions for vouchers, along with the clarifications provided in Circular No. 243/37/2024-GST, marks a progressive step towards reducing unwarranted litigation and aligning GST with judicial pronouncements.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar reading Citation for Sir Ratan Tata.



Shri Vijay Kumar delivering welcome address at TIOL Congress 2025.


Justice C V Bhadang addressing the gathering at TIOL Congress 2025.