News Update

Football legend Diego Maradona passes awayGovt extends terms of ITAT V-P Sushma Chowla & Member A K Garodia till Dec 31, 2020UK Chancellor says Govt to spend 0.5% of GDP on overseas aid in 2021GST Compensation - West Bengal & Kerala finally opt for Option-1NDPS - Charge-sheet prima facie reveals that petitioner is member of a drug syndicate - no bail can be granted: HCNDPS - Judicial precedent cannot be followed as a statute and has to be applied with reference to the facts of the case involved in it: HCGST - There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner had ever attempted to file TRAN-1 even during the extended period - Petition dismissed: HCGST - Refund - Exports through Foreign Post Office - New Procedure prescribed under Circular 14/2018 cannot be made applicable from a retrospective date: HCPost supply discount and ITC reversal - why this kerfuffleGST - Communicating by Email is not a prescribed manner of serving SCNs: HCGST - Rule 142 - When a particular procedure is prescribed to perform a particular act then all other procedures/modes except the one prescribed are excluded: HCGST - Profiteering - Authority has no mandate to look into the matter whether Respondent has wrongly charged GST from Applicants: NAAPrevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not one of the ‘specified Acts’ under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions)Ordinance: HC (See '')PMLA – Covid-19 casualty - Provisional Attachment Order ceases to have effect after 180 days - Adjudicating Authority becomes functus officio: HC (See '')CBIC makes pre-SCN consultation with assessee mandatory for cases of above Rs 50 lakhThe Priced PizzaPenalty notice is invalidated if it does not specify the particular provision of Sec 271AAA, invoked in respect of undisclosed income for which penalty is being imposed: ITATCIT(A) is empowered to entertain a fresh claim raised by the assessee, where the relevant facts for deciding upon such issue are available on record: ITATITC fraud - DGGI arrests one more in HisarAdditions framed are unsustainable, if based on documents which do not pertain to the assessee or his accounts & so are not binding on & cannot be used as evidence against the assessee: ITATST - Works Contract service provided to corporations set up by State Government is not taxable, being exempt under Notfn No 25/2012-ST, as such corporations qualify as 'Government Authority' as defined in the Notfn: CESTATIndia, Myanmar agree to scale up trade relationsVeteran Congress leader Ahmed Patel succumbs to COVID-19 related complicationsCyclone ‘Nivar’ lashes out Chennai; Govt declares holiday on WednesdayCBIC issues transfer ordr of two IRS officersGST - Revenue Secretary, CBIC Members interact with field formations; express concern about tax evasionIndian Contract Act - Cancellation of contract of tender by keeping one of parties to contract in complete dark is violative of natural justice: SC (See '')UP Cabinet nod for Ordinance to curb ‘love jihad’; 10 years imprisonment for violatorsCBIC notifies Link Officers for GST Policy-II
When does Liasion Office become a PE?

FEBRUARY 18, 2009

By Neeraj Dubey, Advocate

A Liaison Office (LO) is a place of business which is permitted to act as a conduit of communication between the principal place of business and entities in India. For opening a LO in India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) grants permission under section 29(1) (a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, subject to certain conditions which defines the ambit of work that can be performed by LO. The scope of LO activities includes representing in India the parent company/group companies, promoting export import from/to India, promoting technical/financial collaborations between parent/group companies and companies in India.

A LO is required to operate and maintain solely out of inward remittances received from abroad through normal banking channel. Generally, without prior permission of the RBI, a LO is not supposed to undertake any activity of a trading/commercial/industrial nature or enter into any business contracts in its own capacity, charge any commission/fee for LO activities/services rendered by it or otherwise in India, borrow/lend any money from/to any person in India, acquire (otherwise than by way of lease for a period not exceeding 5 years) transfer or dispose of any immovable property in India.

The basic premise to decide whether LO is a Permanent Establishment (PE) or not is to draw an inference from what it does in India and not from what it is ordinarily expected to do. This inference can be drawn from various rulings of the Income Tax Tribunal and the Authority for Advance Ruling that have defined the scope of activity of a LO. In UAE Exchange Centre LLC, In re [2004-TIOL-03-ARA-IT), it was held that any LO engaged in part-performance and not merely auxiliary services is deemed to be a PE . The service involved in such cases will itself be understood as business in view of the regularity and continuity of such service. However, if the activities undertaken by a LO are merely preparatory and auxiliary in nature, there can be no inference of a PE. Further, in Western Union Financial Services, 2006-TIOL-58-ITAT-Del, maintenance of fixed place of business, solely for the purpose of advertising, for the supply of information, for scientific research or for other activities which had a preparatory or auxiliary character was not considered a PE.

In order to verify whether the activities of an LO are auxiliary or have transgressed the scope of the permitted conditions, there needs to be clarity on the meaning of auxiliary. Per Black's law dictionary, auxiliary means aiding or supporting and subsidiary. Any activity beyond the scope of the defined functions such as the frequent use of the premises by the parent company staff, soliciting and receiving on behalf of the parent company and part performance of any contract by a LO would impact the LO and constitute it as a PE in India.

A non-resident or a foreign company is treated as having a PE in India under Article 5 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) entered into by India with different countries, if the said non-resident or foreign company carries on business in India through a branch, sales office etc. or through an agent (other than an independent agent) who habitually exercises an authority to conclude contracts or regularly delivers goods or merchandise or habitually secures orders on behalf of the non-resident principal.

This notion of PE excludes sporadic or isolated activities, but covers activities which have continuity or durability. PE shall not include enterprises engaged for the maintenance of fixed place of business solely for the purpose of purchasing goods or merchandise, or collecting information for the enterprise, or maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise solely of processing by another enterprise, or the purpose of advertising for the supply of information, or scientific research, or other activities which have a preparatory or auxiliary character for the enterprise, or any combination of activities mentioned hereinabove, business through a broker, commission agent or any agent of independent status, provided that such person is acting in the ordinary course of their business.

Clearly LO is not a PE, but it can come within the meaning of PE in case some of its activities goes beyond the prescribed/permitted premise by the RBI. When a PE, the profits of the non-resident or foreign company attributable to the business activities carried out in India by the PE becomes taxable in India under Article 7 of the DTAA.

If a foreign enterprise carries on business in India through a PE situated here, the profits of the enterprise may be taxed in India but only to the extent attributable to the PE. Even the profits which those enterprises might expect to make if it were a distinct and separate enterprise engaged in the same or similar activities under the same or similar conditions and dealing wholly independently with the enterprise of which it is a PE, will be taxed in India. The profits to be attributed to a PE are those which that PE would have made if instead of dealing with its head office, it had been independently dealing with an entirely separate enterprise under conditions and at prices prevailing in the ordinary market. This corresponds to the arm's length principle which per the section 92F (iii) of the Income Tax Act means a transaction in which the buyers and sellers of a product act independently, have no relationship to each other and ensure that they are acting in their own self interest and are not subject to any pressure or duress from the other party.

In a matter concerning taxation of Sony Entertainment Television (SET) Singapore, t he Bombay High Court ( HC) in August 2008 held that foreign companies remunerating their Indian subsidiaries on an arm's length basis will not be liable to pay tax in India. If the arm's length basis is not maintained then the parent company is very likely to be taxed in India. The HC upheld the contention of SET Singapore, according to which even if the foreign company has a PE in India, it is not liable to pay tax if the foreign entity pays arm's-length remuneration to the PE of the company and accordingly, SET Singapore is not liable to pay tax in India and only SET India is liable for tax with regard to its own income.

A non-resident entity may outsource certain services to a resident (Indian) entity. If there is no business connection between the two, the resident entity will not be a PE of the non-resident entity, and the resident entity would have to be assessed to income-tax as a separate entity. However, it is possible that the non-resident entity may have a business connection with the resident (Indian) entity. In such a case, the resident (Indian) entity would be treated as the PE of the non-resident entity. Clearly, for a LO, if the scope of its activity expands from being auxiliary or preparatory to anything more, it would be a PE.

(The author is with PSA, Legal Counsellors)