News Update

FM reviews CAPEX of CPSEsGovt writes to over 2800 corporates to clear MSME duesGovt carrying out reforms in every sector of economy to prop up growth: PMIgnoring limitation proves costlyInverted duty structure - A Case study (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)CBIC promotes four officers as Pr Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise + posts Sameer Pandey as DS in GST Council SecretariatSC cannot be a place for Govts to walk in when they choose, ignoring period of limitation prescribed - Petition dismissed as time barred; costs imposed on State for wasting judicial time - amount to be recovered from officers responsible: SCIs penalty compulsorily attracted on late payment of GST?No mutation of COVID-19 detected in India: Health MinisterCus - Goods re-imported for repair and re-exported - Merely because Assessee could claim duty drawback later on and it may give rise to a revenue neutral situation, it cannot be said that period of one year prescribed in 158/95-Cus is without any meaning: HCST - Payment of mobilization advance is a separate financial transaction within contract for providing of service & so is not to be included in gross taxable value as per Section 67 of Finance Act 1994 - duty demand cannot be raised thereon when there is no allegation of any part of contracted value having evaded taxation: CESTATBSVI introduction a revolutionary step: JavadekarCX - It is settled position in law that an assessee is entitled to interest on delayed disbursal of refund after three months from date of filing of refund claim till date of its realisation: CESTATCus - Drawback - After turning down request for taking test samples, Revenue cannot brush aside report given by an expert Committee simply for the reason that sample was not drawn and referred by Department: CESTATPayment made to a trust formed for the benefit of employees of the company, of which the assessee was a shareholder & whose shares the assessee had sold, does not qualify as expenditure incurred wholly in connection with transfer of asset: HCBogus purchases - only the profit element embedded therein is to be disallowed, rather than the entire quantum of purchases made: ITATSearch assessment is invalid where it is completed even before search operations are conducted or where any material incriminating the assessee has not yet been found: ITATWhere assessee did not claim exemption in respect of one residential property, the assessee can avail such benefit in respect of a second house or plot of land: ITATIndia successfully test-fires cruise missile from Indian Navy’s destroyer INS ChennaiCOVID-19: Global tally goes past FOUR Crore with 11.15 lakh deaths; America has close to 27 lakh active cases against 8 lakh in IndiaCOVID-19 - Almost 80% new cases coming from 10 StatesCountrywide S&T infrastructure facilities to be accessible to industry & startups: GovtPM calls for speedy access to vaccines once readyNew Zealand PM earns second term for managing COVID-19 wellDigital Media - Govt to extend all benefits available to othersGovt not considering any DA for Govt employees: GangwarCBDT issues transfer order of 395 Addl / JCITs on All India basisSBI given nod for sale of electoral bonds for 10 daysEducation CESS - the spoilt fruit
 
One Year tenure for Board Members?

TIOL-DDT 41
27 1 2005
Thursday

IT appears that the FM is planning for a minimum one-year tenure for Board Members. While this will provide the much required longevity for a Board member to be of any use, its immediate fallout would be that some of the very senior and deserving Chief Commissioners will not make it to the Board as they have less than an year of service left. This would also mean that some most undeserving officers will make it to the position of Members in the Board. Selecting officers with at least one year of service left, is not going to make the Board more effective if the ones with more years of service are not really the ones with any capacity  to run a complex tax administration in the country.
 
But the FMs idea of appointing Members with at least an year of service will provide some sort of continuity in the Board. Now what happens is that some body becomes a Member of the Board at the fag end of his career with just a few months to go for retirement. He usually spends his few months of time in the Board looking for post-retirement jobs. He has hardly any time or interest (after all he has to think of his future)  for the mundane matters like income tax, excise laws or customs complications.
 
Even a one year tenure is not going to really benefit the system. It is possible that officers with more than a year of service left are not really the most suitable ones to man the Board. Instead of a totally incompetent man running the Board for a few months, we may end up with a totally incompetent man running the Board for 12 months or more and that is more devastating. The selection process should start somewhere at the bottom not the top. We can have a system where every year one officer is promoted based on merit and a rigorous test and not seniority, from each cadre starting from sepoy up to the Chief Commissioner. Over a period of time we will have a small core group of excellent officers, some of whom will reach the Board, not because of blunt seniority but a little merit. 
 
Why the Board at all?
 
Do we really need a Board? The only function the Board had been successfully doing was creating confusion with its clarifications and notifications. In any case, many of the important wings like TRU and TPL have slowly slipped out of the Board. So may be the whole concept of having Revenue Boards should be reviewed. Like other departments, this department can also be headed by an IAS Secretary, who will be heading the department for a short tenure. With officers who have worked in the department for thirty plus years manning the Board, we have all kinds of confusions like faulty notifications and clarifications, it will hardly make any difference if an IAS officer heads the department.
 
A recently appointed Board Member told an Under Secretary, I have been working hard for the last 34 years and I have six more months to go; I want to take rest; please dont bother me with any files . The under Secretary with hardly six years of service and stars in his eyes knows that this man has not been working for the last 34 years; what he will work for the next six months? 
 
Until tomorrow with more of DDT

Have a Nice Day


POST YOUR COMMENTS